Title: Temporal and spatial variability in regionalscale CO2 mixing ratios as measured during the MidContin
1Temporal and spatial variability in
regional-scale CO2 mixing ratios as measured
during the Mid-Continental Intensive study
Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Ken Davis, and
Eric Crosson American Geophysical Union Annual Me
eting 2008 17 Dec 2008
ring2.psu.edu
2Outline
- Mid Continental Intensive, Ring 2
- Temporal variability
- Spatial gradients
- Seasonal cycle
- Comparison to NOAA-ESRL CarbonTracker
- June 2008 flood in midwest
- Explaining small and large spatial gradients
using a regional flux model (forwards)
3NACP Mid-Continental Intensive
The role of Ring 2 in the Mid-Continent Intensive
- Overall goal Seek convergence between top-down
(tower-based) and bottom-up (inventory-based)
ecological estimates of the regional flux
- Focus on upper Midwest of the U.S.
- Add regional network of 5 communications-tower
based atmospheric CO2 obs in the midcontinent
intensive region
- April/May 2007 through October 2008
- Plan to oversample the atmosphere in the
study region for more than a full year
- Inversions to produce maps of fluxes of CO2 for
region (CSU)
WLEF
500 km
4Instrumentation Details Ring 2
- Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (Picarro, Inc.)
- Long-term stability
- Much reduced need for calibration over NDIR
methods
- Both CO2 and H2O are measured
- 30 and 110-140 m AGL
- Quality control
- Two reference gases at each site, sampled daily
- Round-robin tests (Feb and Nov 08)
- Uncertainty
5Synoptic variability in boundary-layer CO2 mixing
ratios
- Seasonal drawdown
- Differences amongst the sites
- 2007 vs 2008
- Day to day variability
6Synoptic variability in boundary-layer CO2 mixing
ratios
- Seasonal drawdown
- Differences amongst the sites
- 2007 vs 2008
- Day to day variability
- Difference in daily value from one day to the
next as large as 10-30 ppm
7Temporal variability Night Day CO2
- Difference between nighttime and daytime values
at 120 m AGL can be over 80 ppm for Ring 2
- Average magnitude of the diurnal cycle at 122 m
for July at LEF 10 ppm (1995-1997) (Bakwin et
al. 1998)
8Temporal variability Night Day CO2
Ring2
LEF
- Difference between nighttime and daytime values
at 120 m AGL can be over 80 ppm for Ring 2
- Average magnitude of the diurnal cycle at 122 m
for July at LEF 10 ppm (1995-1997) (Bakwin et
al. 1998)
9Spatial gradient magnitude (daytime) Growing
seasons 2007-08
- Majority
- But in 6 of cases, the spatial gradient is
between 0.04 and 0.06 ppm/km (Daytime!)
of site-days
- Largest difference amongst the sites for each
daily value
- Seasonal pattern
- Differences as large as 40 - 50 ppm between Ring
2 sites! Daytime!
- Significant day-to-day variability
10Seasonal cycle
- Strong coherent seasonal cycle across stations
- West Branch (wbi) differs significantly from 2007
to 2008
- Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite
being separated by, at most, 550 km. (mm, ce,
lef) vs (kw, rl, wbi)
mlo
11Seasonal cycle
- Strong coherent seasonal cycle across stations
- West Branch (wbi) differs significantly from 2007
to 2008
- Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite
being separated by, at most, 550 km. (mm, ce,
lef) vs (kw, rl, wbi)
mlo
12Seasonal cycle
- Strong coherent seasonal cycle across stations
- West Branch (wbi) differs significantly from 2007
to 2008
- Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite
being separated by, at most, 550 km. (mm, ce,
lef) vs (kw, rl, wbi)
mlo
13Dominant vegetation map
Corn for Grain 2007Yield per Harvested Acre by
County
Courtesy of K. Corbin
14NOAA-ESRL Carbon Tracker
Ring2 sites not included as input for 2007
http//carbontracker.noaa.gov
152007
14-day smoother applied to CT output
mid-afternoon values only (1930 GMT)
Overall drawdown in CT2008 is too weak, but some
features of modeled variability are consistent
with obs, e.g., there is a lot of variability
and MM has less drawdown than WBI, RL and KW in
both model and obs.
A. Andrews
16Flooding in the Midwest June 2008
17Seasonal cycle
- Strong coherent seasonal cycle across stations
- West Branch (wbi) differs significantly from 2007
to 2008
- Large variance in seasonal drawdown, despite
being separated by, at most, 550 km (mm, ce, lef)
vs (kw, rl, wbi)
18Delay in seasonal drawdown
- 2008 growing season is uniformly delayed by about
one month, compared to 2007
- Effect of June 2008 flood?
- Recovery increased uptake later in the growing
season
2007
2008
2007 solid 2008 dashed
19Regional flux model forward results
- SiB3-RAMS coupled with crop phenology model for
corn and soybean
- Addition of crops greatly improved models
agreement with obs
- Gradients of daily minimum value obs vs model
- Simulated CO2 at 120 m above ground level on 16
July 2007, illustrating advective controls on CO2
gradients observed across the Ring2 towers
B51A-0364 Corbin et al. Effects of Agricultural
Production on Regional Variations of Atmospheric
CO2 Concentrations
B51A-0355 Lokupitiya et al. Evaluation of the p
erformance of SiBCrop model in predicting carbon
fluxes and crop yields in the croplands of the US
mid continental region
20Summary
- Temporal variability
- diurnal cycle magnitude large compared to LEF
- 2008 flood in the Midwest US
- Spatial gradients large difference between
sites despite relatively small site separations
- Seasonal cycle
- difference amongst sites, some with very large
seasonal drawdown
- Comparisons to NOAA-ESRL CarbonTracker
- Weak overall drawdown, but good variability