Cooperative Design and Control of Distributed Harmonic and Reactive Compensators PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 60
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cooperative Design and Control of Distributed Harmonic and Reactive Compensators


1
Cooperative Design and Control of Distributed
Harmonic and Reactive Compensators
International School on Nonsinusoidal Currents
and Compensation (ISNCC 08) Lagów, (Poland) 10
- 13 June 2008
  • Elisabetta Tedeschi, Paolo Tenti
  • Department of Information Engineering, University
    of Padova, Italy

2
Presentation Outline
  • Compensation goals and methods
  • Definition and properties of instantaneous and
    average power terms
  • Reactive power under non-sinusoidal conditions
  • Orthogonal current decomposition
  • Apparent power decomposition
  • Cooperative design and control of distributed
    compensators
  • quasi-stationary compensators (reactive power
    compensation)
  • dynamic compensators (reactive and distortion
    power compensation)
  • Control application and results of single-phase
    and three-phase systems
  • Conclusions

3
Compensation goals and methods
  • Vision
  • In addition to nonlinear loads pollution,
    distributed generation is an increasingly
    important issue in view of compensation in
    fact, wind generators, photovoltaic plants, fuel
    cells, micro-turbines are more and more diffused
    in electrical networks
  • Optimal utilization of alternative energy sources
    requires matching between generators and grid
    parameters, which is obtained by suitable
    electronic interfaces
  • In addition to their adaptation function, such
    interfaces may perform as distributed
    compensation units too
  • Coordination of their design and operation may
    improve global and local network utilization
    while avoiding detrimental interactions

4
Compensation goals and methods
  • Goal of Compensation
  • Generally, the goal of compensation is twofold
  • On the supply side, compensation aims at reducing
    the energy loss associated to power delivery
  • On the load side, compensation aims at improving
    the quality of supply
  • The first goal requires proper shaping of the
    current drawn from the grid
  • The second goal requires limitation of voltage
    distortion at load terminals

5
Compensation goals and methods
  • Compensator types
  • Stationary (passive) compensators include passive
    filters (low-pass / selective) and fixed
    reactances (inductors / capacitors), designed to
    provide a given amount of reactive power
    absorption and/or harmonic filtering under rated
    conditions.
  • These compensators are cheap and quite
    standardized, however they must be optimized for
    each specific load and location, taking into
    account that the behavior of passive elements is
    strongly affected by surrounding network
    parameters.

6
Compensation goals and methods
  • Compensator types
  • Quasi-stationary (reactive) compensators, i.e.,
    Static VAR Compensators (SVC), include
    thyristor-controlled reactors (TCR) and
    thyristor-switched capacitors (TSC). By properly
    gating the thyristors, such compensators provide
    positive or negative reactive power absorption
    from zero to a rated amount.
  • These compensators are cheap, however reactive
    power control is normally associated to
    detrimental injection of current harmonics at the
    connecting point.
  • Regulation provided by SVC is necessarily slow,
    since thyristors are gated only once per line
    cycle.

7
Compensation goals and methods
  • Compensator types
  • Dynamic (active) compensators include Switching
    Power Compensators (SPC), i.e., Active Power
    Filters (APF), which provide fast control and can
    compensate for transient and/or high-frequency
    current components absorbed by time-varying /
    distorting loads.
  • These compensators are more expensive and,
    therefore, less diffused than the other ones.

8
Compensation goals and methods
  • Distributed Compensation
  • Complex networks may include several compensation
    units connected to different network ports
  • Such compensating units are normally designed and
    driven independently, neglecting their
    potentiality to coordinate, reinforce or affect
    each others compensation capability
  • Cooperative design and control of distributed
    compensation units has the potential to achieve
    full exploitation of the installed compensation
    capability, while avoiding unwanted interactions
    and instabilities

9
Cooperative operation of distributed compensators
Compensation goals and methods
  • Compensation requirements are expressed in terms
    of supply (input) currents and/or load (output)
    voltages
  • Instead, compensation commands can be expressed
    in power terms, since these are conservative
    quantities
  • Quasi-stationary compensators are driven to
    absorb a suitable amount of reactive power
  • Dynamic compensators are driven to absorb a
    suitable amount of instantaneous complex power

A distributed compensation system may produce the
same effect of an APF acting at the input port
10
Goal
  • General approach for cooperative design and
    control
  • of distributed compensators
  • The approach makes use of conservative
    power-like quantities and applies to
    quasi-stationary compensators and dynamic
    compensators single-phase and three-phase
    networks sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal
    conditions
  • Steps
  • Definition of instantaneous and average power
    terms
  • conservative, related to power absorption and
    energy storage, valid under sinusoidal and
    non-sinusoidal conditions
  • Decomposition of current
  • orthogonal terms, each one related to a physical
    phenomenon (power absorption, energy storage,
    load unbalance,voltage current distortion)
  • Decomposition of apparent power
  • active, reactive, unbalance and distortion terms
  • Control of distributed compensators
  • SVC (quasi-stationary control) unbalance and
    reactive power compensation
  • APF (dynamic control) instantaneous complex
    power compensation
  • Application examples
  • Single phase, three-phase (3- and 4-wire),
    asymmetrical voltages, unbalanced load

11
Hat operator unbiased integral function
  • Given variable x(t), which is real, periodic,
    continuous and alternate, let

Average value
Time integral function
we define the unbiased integral function (hat
operator) as
  • Hat quantities are homogeneous to basic variables
  • Quantities and are also referred as
    integral voltage and integral current

12
Properties of hat quantities
  • From the definitions of internal product and
    norm
  • we easily obtain
  • Moreover, under sinusoidal operation

13
Instantaneous power definitions(valid for
periodic variables)
Real power
Complex power
Imaginary power
  • The three definitions of imaginary power are
    equivalent in average. In instantaneous terms,
    however
  • definition (1) is insensitive to resistive
    current components
  • definition (2) naturally applies to voltage-fed
    units
  • definition (3) naturally applies to current-fed
    units

14
A property of imaginary power q1
If instantaneous imaginary power q1 is zero at
any time then current and voltage are proportional
Demonstration
Expressing voltage and current terms in p.u. we
have
which can be derived to obtain
Viceversa, imaginary power q1 is insensitive to
resistive current components
15
Conservation of instantaneous power terms
  • For any given network p, let u and i be the
    vectors of branch voltages and currents
  • Integral branch voltages are consistent with
    network p, i.e. they comply with KLV (Kirchhoffs
    law for voltages)
  • Integral branch currents are consistent with
    network p, i.e. they comply with KLC (Kirchhoffs
    law for currents)
  • Thus, according to Tellegens Theorem

Real, imaginary and, consequently, complex power
are conservative quantities in every network
16
Average power definitions(valid for periodic
quantities)
Active power
Reactive power
Apparent power
17
Power terms in passive networks
Resistor
18
Power terms in passive networks
Inductor
Inductor energy
19
Power terms in passive networks
Capacitor
Capacitor energy
20
Power terms in passive networks
21
Active and reactive power absorption of a linear
passive network p
Remark Whichever is the origin of reactive
power, including active and nonlinear loads, it
can be compensated by reactive elements with
proper energy storage capability
Total absorbed power
22
Orthogonal current decompositionSingle phase
circuits
  • Current terms
  • ia active current
  • in non-active current
  • ir reactive current
  • iv void current
  • isa scattered active current
  • isr scattered reactive current
  • ig generated current
  • Orthogonality. All terms in the above equations
    are orthogonal, thus



23
Orthogonal current decomposition
  • Active current (Fryze current)

  • Non-active current
  • Reactive current
  • Void current

24
Orthogonal current decomposition
  • Active current (Fryze current)

  • Non-active current

  • Reactive current

The void current reflects the presence of
scattered active, scattered reactive and
generated terms
  • Void current

25
Scattered active current
  • For each co-existing harmonic component of
    voltage and current we define
  • Harmonic active current terms

  • Total harmonic active current

  • Scattered active current

26
Scattered reactive current
  • For each co-existing harmonic component of
    voltage and current we define
  • Harmonic reactive current terms

  • Total harmonic reactive current

  • Scattered reactive current

27
Apparent and distortion power
  • Apparent power

Distortion power
Du is voltage distortion power Di is current
distortion power
28
Distortion power terms
Voltage distortion power (vanishes for sinusoidal
voltage supply or in absence of reactive power
absorption)
su is voltage distortion factor and vanishes
under sinusoidal operation
Current distortion power (vanishes in absence of
void current)
si is current distortion factor and vanishes if
void current is zero
29
Extension to poly-phase systems
  • Current decomposition into active, reactive and
    void current can be separately applied to each of
    the N phases



30
Extension to poly-phase systems
  • When active and reactive components are
    determined globally, balanced active and reactive
    terms are obtained
  • Balanced active current


  • Balanced reactive current
  • By difference unbalanced components are obtained

31
Orthogonal current decomposition
  • Current terms
  • ib balanced currents
  • iu unbalanced currents
  • iba balanced active currents
  • ibr balanced reactive currents
  • iua unbalanced active currents
  • iur unbalanced reactive currents
  • iv void currents
  • Orthogonality. All terms in the above equations
    are orthogonal, thus



32
Apparent power decomposition
From current decomposition
33
Apparent power decomposition
S is useful power P is active power Q is
reactive power Su is unbalance power Sua
active unbalance power Sur reactive unbalance
power D is distortion power Du is voltage
distortion power Di is current distortion power
34
Distributed compensatorsDesign criteria
  • Passive filters are designed to provide local
    reactive/harmonic compensation under rated
    stationary conditions
  • Static VAR Compensators (TCR and TSC) are
    cooperatively designed together with passive
    filters so as to provide, as a whole, the energy
    storage capability required to compensate for
    worst-case unbalance and reactive power
    absorption
  • Active power filters are designed to provide, as
    a whole, a proper dynamic compensation
    capability, so as to face distortion power,
    supply and load transients, delays of other
    compensators etc.

35
Distributed compensatorsUse of power command
  • If the compensation command is given in power
    terms, it is not affected by turn ratio and phase
    rotation of transformers
  • Moreover, compared to current command, the power
    command is less affected by network dynamics,
    i.e., by cross-impedances between input port and
    compensation ports (parasitic phenomena due to
    resonances, voltage drops on line impedances,
    transfer function of passive filters, nonlinear
    loads)
  • Finally, a power command generated at the input
    port can be shared among various compensation
    units acting in the same network according to
    their power ratings and distance from the input
    port

36
Distributed compensatorsControl criteria
  • SVC units (TCR, TSC) are driven by an average
    complex power command and adjust the inductive or
    capacitive energy storage according to unbalance
    and reactive power compensation need at the input
    port. SVCs execute the power command within a
    line cycle, providing quasi-stationary control of
    unbalance and reactive power.
  • APF units are driven by an instantaneous complex
    power command, which is converted into a suitable
    current command to provide dynamic compensation
    of (unbalance reactive ) void currents at the
    input port.

37
Distributed compensatorsDynamic control
  • For the purpose of dynamic control of distributed
    switching compensators, assuming that they are
    voltage-fed, we select the following definition

real power
imaginary power
and consequently
complex power
  • For control purposes, all definitions of
    imaginary power are viable
  • However, the above choice makes control simpler
    for voltage-fed shunt APF
  • In fact, no reference is made to integral
    current, which would introduce an additional
    state variable in control

38
Structure of dynamic control
The Central Control Unit determines the power
command as a function of the desired behavior at
the input port The Local Control Units transform
the power command in a current command for each
APF
39
Structure of dynamic control
  • Central Control Unit
  • CRG (Current Reference Generator) determines
    input current references as a function of input
    port variables and requirements
  • ii f(pi, ui, PF, THD)

40
CRG - Current Reference Generator
CRG generates input current references according
to suitable criteria, e.g.
Unity power factor (active currents)
Constant input power
Minimum currents conveying instantaneous real
power
Only positive sequence, sinusoidal currents etc.
41
Structure of dynamic control
42
EA - Error Amplifier
  • The error amplifier is designed according to
    usual criteria taking into account the transfer
    function between APF current and input current.
  • For this purpose, reference is made to the
    equivalent single-phase p.u. circuit.
  • In fact, phase rotation and voltage shift caused
    by transformers do not affect the power command.

43
Structure of dynamic control
  • Central Control Unit
  • PS (Power Sharing unit) distributes complex power
    reference among the various compensators

44
PS - Power Sharing Unit
  • The Power Sharing unit distributes the power
    command to the various APF considering
  • Power rating of each APF
  • Distance of each APF from the input port (i.e.,
    response time and attenuation factor of the
    transfer function between APF current and input
    current)
  • Residual compensation capability of each APF,
    which can perform local compensation too
  • While parameters 1 and 2 can be assigned at
    system set up, parameter 3 requires real-time
    interaction between APF and PSU

45
Structure of dynamic control
  • Local Control Unit (LCU)
  • This unit transforms the complex power command
    generated by PS unit for each APF into a suitable
    current reference

46
Local Control Unit
  • The function of the LCU is to convert the complex
    power command given to the APF into a current
    command.
  • The power-current conversion algorithm performs
    differently depending on network type, i.e.
  • Three-phase three-wire
  • Single-phase
  • Three-phase four-wire

47
Three-phase three-wire systems Power-current
conversion algorithm
  • In a three-phase three-wire system there is a
    univocal correspondence between the complex power
    absorbed at a specified port and the
    corresponding currents. Let

the conversion equations are
48
Three-phase three-wire systems Application
example
  • Distorted input voltage (5th harmonic 10, 7th
    harmonic 5)
  • Wye/delta transformer
  • Ohmic-inductive load RL-LL ZL1 pu, cos f 0.9
  • Ls 0.05 pu at fundamental frequency
  • SVC is driven to compensate load reactive power
  • APF performs remaining compensation

49
Three-phase three-wire systems Application
example
  • As a whole the network appears as a resistive
    load
  • APF and SVC perform cooperatively though
    connected to different points

50
Single-phase systems Power-current conversion
algorithm
  • For a given APF supply voltage u, the algorithm
    must determine current reference i which better
    suits complex power reference s

.
  • Since p and q set two independent conditions on
    variable i, in general only an approximate
    solution can be found
  • Current reference i is selected to minimize the
    error function

resulting in
51
Single-phase systems Power-current conversion
algorithm
  • Coefficients a and b can be dynamically adjusted
    to provide good accuracy, in spite of the
    variation of power and voltage terms
  • Smooth operation is ensured also around critical
    times, when and vanish
  • An effective solution is

while keeping
52
Single-phase systemsApplication example
APF
  • Ohmic-inductive load RL-LL ZL1 p.u., cos f 0.9
  • Very high line inductance (ZLs 0.2 p.u.)
  • Capacitor bank (Zc 2.3 p.u.)
  • Distorted input voltage (5th harmonic 10, 7th
    harmonic 5)

53
Single-phase systemsApplication example
  • Input current and voltage

Input and APF voltage
  • The input current tracks the input voltage with
    good accuracy, in spite of the inherent error
    introduced by the algorithm

54
Extension to three-phase four-wire systems
  • The APF can control the homopolar current, which
    can compensate for zero-sequence power absorption
  • If u0 and i0 are voltage and current of the
    neutral wire, instantaneous power terms absorbed
    by the APF are
  • Selecting the voltage reference so that
  • and considering that

where
we have
55
Extension to three-phase four-wire systems
  • According to these definitions, zero-sequence
    components can be treated separately from the
    other ones
  • Given total power reference
  • and zero-current power reference
  • non-zero current references are obtained by

56
Three-phase unbalanced system Application example
  • Distorted input voltage (5th harmonic 10, 7th
    harmonic 5)
  • Wye/delta transformer
  • Single-phase ohmic-inductive load RL-LL ZL1 pu,
    cos f 0.9
  • Ls 0.05 p.u. at fundamental frequency
  • APF performs the entire compensation

57
Three-phase unbalanced system Application example
  • Input currents

APF currents
  • The proposed control technique inherently
    compensates also for load unbalance

58
Compensation of 3-phase unbalanced systems by
SVCs and APFs
  • Steinmetz method for unbalance compensation can
    be extended to asymmetrical and distorted networks

An exact solution for Steinmetz network
parameters is possible only in case of
symmetrical voltages. Otherwise an approximate
solution can be found.
59
Distributed compensation of load unbalance and
reactive power
  • Distributed SVCs can be used to compensate for
    unbalance and reactive current components
  • APFs allow compensation of void currents too
  • The power commands are generated as follows
  • Based on this approach, every unwanted current
    component (reactive, unbalanced and void) can be
    eliminated by cooperative operation of the
    compensators. Almost balanced active currents are
    absorbed at PCC.

60
Three-phase unbalanced system Application example
  • Distorted and unbalanced input voltage
  • Single-phase ohmic-inductive load RL-LL ZL1 pu,
    cos f 0.9
  • APF and SVC share the compensation duty

61
Three-phase unbalanced system Application example
t0 all compensators off t1 fixed capacitors CF
are inserted t2 TCR is connected t3 APF is
switched on
  • Voltage and currents at PCC
  • Unbalance, reactive and harmonic compensation can
    effectively be achieved by cooperative operation
    of the various kinds of compensators

62
Conclusions
  • A general approach to cooperative design and
    operation of distributed unbalance, reactive and
    harmonic compensators has been presented.
  • It is based on power-like quantities, which are
    conservative and have physical meaning, being
    related to power absorption and energy storage.
  • The approach requires averaging of control
    quantities over a line period and applies both to
    quasi-stationary control of SVCs and dynamic
    control of APFs. In the latter case, however,
    fast communication between Central Control Unit
    and Local Control Units is required, which is a
    problem in practical applications.
  • According to the proposed control, the system of
    distributed compensators performs as an APF
    connected at the input port.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com