Title: Traps in the Decision Making Process Thinking Styles
1Traps in the Decision Making ProcessThin
king Styles
- Recognizing and Countering Heuristic Traps
- Harold V. Langlois
2Examining Flawed Decision Making
- Understanding thought processes
- Exploring barriers blocking translation of
thoughts to effective behavior - Recognizing unconscious routines for coping with
complexity (Heuristics) - Balancing the perspectives of past, present and
future behaviors
3The Framing Trap - Review
- Creating an argument that is self-fulfilling or
guarantees a desired outcomecan block
development of alternatives - Strategy Reframing the problem
- Considering other outcomes
- Evaluating different framing options
4Anchoring Trap
- Disproportionate weight to initial information
- Estimates of risk or benefit
- Suitability of a specific option
- Strategy Uncover these predispositions
- Articulate goals and expectations
- Unfreeze old connects that block reasessment
- Use past connections to enhance networking
- Recognize differences between past conditions and
present realities - Be aware of ones discomfort with change
5The Status Quo Trap
- Bias toward perpetuating the here and now
- Protective attitude about present assumptions
- Identify status quo
- Determine if defensiveness is based on a lack of
knowledge, or an emotional commitment (e.g.,
originally my idea) - Fear of the unknown if change occurs
6The Status Quo Trap (continued)
- Mindsets may mirror assumptions about ones life
or success - Boundaries may be blurred
- Organizational assumptions may be linked to
personal disappointments - Changes in the workplace represent turbulence,
and may result in anxiety
7The Status Quo Trap (continued)
- Over-representation of the benefits of current
organizational direction - Circular reasoning (I know what I have I dont
know what I might have had) - Reinforcement for maintaining the status quo
(dont rock the boat)
8Navigating Around the Status Quo
- Help others to identify their reasoning
- Determine where they are anchored
- Talk about discomfort with change
- Changing direction can be incremental
- Help others to focus on options with cost/benefit
implications - Use the what if approach
9Navigating Around the Status Quo(continued)
- Accept incremental change in direction
- Focus on small steps (today is the beginning of
the future) - Dont focus on too many alternatives
- Emphasize team members taking control of his/her
responsibilities
10The Sunk Cost Trap
- Making choices that validate past decisions
- Prior choices may have been costly, and may have
required a large effort to fix a problem - Embarrassment about having failed in a past
strategic intervention - Need to protect your honor or dignity
- May have involved a career setback
11Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap
- Seek feedback from others not involved in past
decision - Provides a new perspective
- May also result in new contacts/outreach
- Assess needs of other stakeholders
- How these needs affect current options
- Identifying possible conflicts
12Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap(continued)
- Clarify why past mistakes are distressing
- May affect self-esteem
- Decision may have matched realities of a past
time, but no longer be appropriate - Extenuating circumstances may have changed
13Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap(continued)
- Stress importance of personal growth
- Avoids creating a climate of failure-fearing
- Meets need for a well-constructed personal and
professional plan - Helps to align stakeholders on the same page
14The Confirming Evidence Trap
- Looking for evidence and confirmation from those
who have a similar perspective or a vested
interest - Overweighting supportive information, while
avoiding the search for conflicting data
15Avoiding the Confirming Evidence Trap
- Assist others in sorting evidence
- List people who benefit from the favored approach
- List those who might benefit from another
scenario - Collaborate on developing alternative scenarios
16Avoiding the Confirming Evidence Trap (continued)
- Emphasize need to identify specific motives of
team member and other stakeholders - Focus on meeting individual and team goals (not
mutually exclusive)
17Estimating Forecasting Traps
- Needing to make estimates in the face of
uncertainty - Overconfidence (rose-colored glasses)
- Understanding the difficulties
- Optimism may lead to quick fixes, or assuming you
are smarter than everyone else
18Estimating Forecasting Traps(continued)
- Prudence (stakes are too high and we need to duck
and cover) - Risk probabilities may be exaggerated
- May act too conservatively without an effective
action plan - Recallability (base predictions on what we think
we remember) - Likely to shade the data in our favor
- Usually dont remember too well
19Avoiding Estimating Forecasting Traps
- Disciplined approach to making forecasts or
judging probabilities - Look at up side down side for inconsistencies
- Avoid regret as much as possible
- Dont overpromise benefits
- Have client challenge his/her estimates
- Try to minimize distortions in memory
20Managing Heuristics
- Greater vulnerability to heuristic traps at times
of discontinuous change - Recognize heuristic traps and develop countering
strategies - Organizational learning involves individual
efforts in taking responsibility for personal
mindsets and blocking behaviors - Leading change initiatives requires strong
commitment to examining ones own mindsets and
thinking style
21Thinking Styles
- Synthesist - Challenge accepted views
- Idealist - Defend the value system
- Pragmatist - Get it done
- Analyst - Study the details
- Realist - Organize and then take action
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26Thinking Style Summary for Class
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Summary
- Thinking style analysis helps one to better
understand what underlies how you approach
information - Understanding heuristics helps one to avoid
entrapment by unconscious thought routines - Still to comeUtilizing these skills within
organizational settings for effective coaching