Traps in the Decision Making Process Thinking Styles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Traps in the Decision Making Process Thinking Styles

Description:

Exploring barriers blocking translation of thoughts to ... Fear of the unknown if change occurs. The Status Quo Trap ... a climate of 'failure-fearing' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:436
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Adv84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Traps in the Decision Making Process Thinking Styles


1
Traps in the Decision Making ProcessThin
king Styles
  • Recognizing and Countering Heuristic Traps
  • Harold V. Langlois

2
Examining Flawed Decision Making
  • Understanding thought processes
  • Exploring barriers blocking translation of
    thoughts to effective behavior
  • Recognizing unconscious routines for coping with
    complexity (Heuristics)
  • Balancing the perspectives of past, present and
    future behaviors

3
The Framing Trap - Review
  • Creating an argument that is self-fulfilling or
    guarantees a desired outcomecan block
    development of alternatives
  • Strategy Reframing the problem
  • Considering other outcomes
  • Evaluating different framing options

4
Anchoring Trap
  • Disproportionate weight to initial information
  • Estimates of risk or benefit
  • Suitability of a specific option
  • Strategy Uncover these predispositions
  • Articulate goals and expectations
  • Unfreeze old connects that block reasessment
  • Use past connections to enhance networking
  • Recognize differences between past conditions and
    present realities
  • Be aware of ones discomfort with change

5
The Status Quo Trap
  • Bias toward perpetuating the here and now
  • Protective attitude about present assumptions
  • Identify status quo
  • Determine if defensiveness is based on a lack of
    knowledge, or an emotional commitment (e.g.,
    originally my idea)
  • Fear of the unknown if change occurs

6
The Status Quo Trap (continued)
  • Mindsets may mirror assumptions about ones life
    or success
  • Boundaries may be blurred
  • Organizational assumptions may be linked to
    personal disappointments
  • Changes in the workplace represent turbulence,
    and may result in anxiety

7
The Status Quo Trap (continued)
  • Over-representation of the benefits of current
    organizational direction
  • Circular reasoning (I know what I have I dont
    know what I might have had)
  • Reinforcement for maintaining the status quo
    (dont rock the boat)

8
Navigating Around the Status Quo
  • Help others to identify their reasoning
  • Determine where they are anchored
  • Talk about discomfort with change
  • Changing direction can be incremental
  • Help others to focus on options with cost/benefit
    implications
  • Use the what if approach

9
Navigating Around the Status Quo(continued)
  • Accept incremental change in direction
  • Focus on small steps (today is the beginning of
    the future)
  • Dont focus on too many alternatives
  • Emphasize team members taking control of his/her
    responsibilities

10
The Sunk Cost Trap
  • Making choices that validate past decisions
  • Prior choices may have been costly, and may have
    required a large effort to fix a problem
  • Embarrassment about having failed in a past
    strategic intervention
  • Need to protect your honor or dignity
  • May have involved a career setback

11
Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap
  • Seek feedback from others not involved in past
    decision
  • Provides a new perspective
  • May also result in new contacts/outreach
  • Assess needs of other stakeholders
  • How these needs affect current options
  • Identifying possible conflicts

12
Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap(continued)
  • Clarify why past mistakes are distressing
  • May affect self-esteem
  • Decision may have matched realities of a past
    time, but no longer be appropriate
  • Extenuating circumstances may have changed

13
Avoiding the Sunk Cost Trap(continued)
  • Stress importance of personal growth
  • Avoids creating a climate of failure-fearing
  • Meets need for a well-constructed personal and
    professional plan
  • Helps to align stakeholders on the same page

14
The Confirming Evidence Trap
  • Looking for evidence and confirmation from those
    who have a similar perspective or a vested
    interest
  • Overweighting supportive information, while
    avoiding the search for conflicting data

15
Avoiding the Confirming Evidence Trap
  • Assist others in sorting evidence
  • List people who benefit from the favored approach
  • List those who might benefit from another
    scenario
  • Collaborate on developing alternative scenarios

16
Avoiding the Confirming Evidence Trap (continued)
  • Emphasize need to identify specific motives of
    team member and other stakeholders
  • Focus on meeting individual and team goals (not
    mutually exclusive)

17
Estimating Forecasting Traps
  • Needing to make estimates in the face of
    uncertainty
  • Overconfidence (rose-colored glasses)
  • Understanding the difficulties
  • Optimism may lead to quick fixes, or assuming you
    are smarter than everyone else

18
Estimating Forecasting Traps(continued)
  • Prudence (stakes are too high and we need to duck
    and cover)
  • Risk probabilities may be exaggerated
  • May act too conservatively without an effective
    action plan
  • Recallability (base predictions on what we think
    we remember)
  • Likely to shade the data in our favor
  • Usually dont remember too well

19
Avoiding Estimating Forecasting Traps
  • Disciplined approach to making forecasts or
    judging probabilities
  • Look at up side down side for inconsistencies
  • Avoid regret as much as possible
  • Dont overpromise benefits
  • Have client challenge his/her estimates
  • Try to minimize distortions in memory

20
Managing Heuristics
  • Greater vulnerability to heuristic traps at times
    of discontinuous change
  • Recognize heuristic traps and develop countering
    strategies
  • Organizational learning involves individual
    efforts in taking responsibility for personal
    mindsets and blocking behaviors
  • Leading change initiatives requires strong
    commitment to examining ones own mindsets and
    thinking style

21
Thinking Styles
  • Synthesist - Challenge accepted views
  • Idealist - Defend the value system
  • Pragmatist - Get it done
  • Analyst - Study the details
  • Realist - Organize and then take action

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Thinking Style Summary for Class
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Summary
  • Thinking style analysis helps one to better
    understand what underlies how you approach
    information
  • Understanding heuristics helps one to avoid
    entrapment by unconscious thought routines
  • Still to comeUtilizing these skills within
    organizational settings for effective coaching
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com