Assignment Review Lecture 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Assignment Review Lecture 4

Description:

Assignment Review. Lecture 4. Private Sector Financing Health Care in the US ... Consumer backlash peaked in 2000; premature obituaries for MC? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: carolga
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assignment Review Lecture 4


1
Assignment ReviewLecture 4
  • Private Sector Financing Health Care in the US

2
Whos footing the bill for PHI?
  • 1987 2000 2002 2003
  • Tot PHI premiums(B) 147.9 450.6 549.5
    600.6
  • Employer contrib
  • - Private 84.4 251.3 297.2
    320.6
  • - Federal 4.9 14.3 17.7 19.7
  • - State/Local 16.7 58.6
    77.1 86.2
  • Employee contrib
  • - Private 23.3 79.2 98.4 109.1
  • - Federal 2.4
    5.3 6.6 7.3
  • - State/ Local 3.8 13.2
    18.0 20.1
  • Individual Policy 12.5 28.7
    34.5 37.6
  • Num. Enrollees (M) 181.4 197.6
    195.6 194.5
  • Per Enrollee est. () 815 2,280
    2,810 3,088

3
Sources of Payment for Private Health Insurance
Coverage, 1987-2000
Individual Policy Premiums6
Individual Policy Premiums9
Employee Contribution to PHI 19
Employee Contribution to PHI 22
Employer Contribution to PHI72
Employer Contribution to PHI72
1987
2000
Source CMS, Office of the Actuary, National
Health Statistics Group.
Employees share of health insurance premiums has
grown.
4
Premium change 1985 - 2005
Source mconline www.mcareol.com
5
Premiums cover growing health services 1980 -
1997
Note Coverage for selected services offered by
medium/ large businesses. Not available.
Source Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
6
Recent trends in PHI premiums
  • MC tackled early 90s double digit growth growth
    returned in late 90s, recently abated.
  • Total premiums more than doubled, number of
    enrollees grew less than 6 in past 10 years.
  • Growth 5.9 1991 1998 8.3 1999 2003.
  • Share paid by employer (2003 vs 1987)
  • Private Dropped 3.8 currently pay 74.6
  • Federal Increased 6.0 currently pay 72.9
  • State/Local Trimmed 0.4 to 81.1
  • Possible root causes enrollee decline structural
    shift from manufacturing employee premium share
    increase.

7
Household out-of-pocket trends
  • Out-of-pocket (OOP) spending does not include PHI
    premiums, Medicare payroll taxes, or Medicare SMI
    premiums.
  • 1987 2003, OOP grew at a rate much less than
    total spending or PHI premiums
  • 108.9B (1987) to 230.5B (2003)
  • OOP dropped, as a percent of household HSS
    spending, from 58 (1987) to 45 (2003) fairly
    constant since 2000.
  • US OOP of HC spending in middle of OECD
    industrialized nations (e.g. US 15
    Switzerland 33, Source OECD)

8
Table 4.1 National Health Spending From
Out-of-Pocket and Private Health Insurance,
1980-2005 Over the last 25 years, the share of
national health spending from out-of-pocket
sources has declined, while that from private
health insurance has increased.
Projected Source CMS, Office of the Actuary,
National Health Statistics Group.
www.cms.hhs.gov/charts/healthcaresystem/chapter4.p
pt1
9
Managed Care Where we are
  • MC enrollment 2004
  • HMO 69M
  • PPO 109M
  • MC penetration 2004
  • Medicare 12.5
  • Medicaid 60.3
  • Comml 91.2
  • Total (incl. uninsured) 60.3 Source
    MCOnline.

Source mcareol.com
10
HMOs have declined
  • Consumer backlash peaked in 2000 premature
    obituaries for MC?
  • HMO penetration varies widely among MSAs and
    among private insurance/ Medicare/ Medicaid
  • Provider appetite dulled recognition that
    provider underwriting more complex than was
    anticipated.

11
HMO Enrollment Trend1985 2004 (M)
Source mconline www.mcareol.com
12
MC Some signs of revival
  • During 2002/ 2003 utilization management
    techniques tentatively re-implemented
  • Companies found prior authorization process
    discourages not medically necessary services
    even though the requests are rarely denied.
  • No trend back to primary care gatekeeping.
  • Notification not pre-authorization
  • Source CTS Tracking Survey 2004

13
More emphasis on the case
  • Use of HEDIS data and predictive simulations
  • Move toward targeted case management rather than
    disease management multiple health conditions
  • Experimenting with tiered networks and P4P

14
Direction in question
  • Surveys indicate consumers are unwilling to pay
    more for fewer constraints but consumers still
    dislike MC constraints.
  • MC role in consumer-driven HC not yet known some
    plans experimenting.
  • Someone will manage costs insurers/ TPA
    government consumer.

15
Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health
Benefits, 1988-2001
A declining share of large firms offers retiree
health benefits.
All Small Firms(3-199 Workers)
All Large Firms(200 Workers)
Source Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored
Health Benefits 2000, 2001 KPMG Survey of
Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits 1988, 1991,
1993, 1995.
Section III.B.2. Page 4
16
Change in Retiree Benefits at Large Firms
2000-2002
Large firms that offer retiree benefits are
scaling back those benefits.
Source Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored
Health Benefits 2002.
17
The future of US private sector in HC
  • Problem definition -- cut costs vs. add value? Or
    both?
  • Consumer-driven HC -- HSAs
  • Leapfrog -- Change the value equation CPOE,
    intensivists, EB hospital referral.
  • Can employer groups affect cost/ quality of
    medicine through acquisition by quality
    principles?
  • Mandates individual/ employer/ both?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com