Lippi-Green part 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lippi-Green part 2

Description:

... offense to it, but how is this different from Oprah switching back and forth? Do we say that Oprah is ok with doing it because she is just going back to her ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: J297
Category:
Tags: green | lippi | oprah | part

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lippi-Green part 2


1
Lippi-Green part 2
2
Five Educational/Language Court Cases
  • Sparks vs. Griffin (1972)
  • Griffin has bad grammar
  • I disagree with Lippi-Greens argument in
    chapters 9 and 10 regarding what she calls
    subordination tactics on the part of northern
    whites to force blacks and southern whites to
    assimilate culturally and linguistically. I think
    her diction is biased and dated. She quotes court
    cases from the 1970s when negro was common
    terminology (Jama)
  • Edwards vs. Gladewater School Dist. (1978)
  • Mandhare (1985)
  • Court skirted issue of languagefocused on other
    technicality
  • Hou (1993)
  • Higher education
  • issue of intelligibility
  • Michigan Case (1979)
  • Video of principal participants

3
More Lippi-Green Bias? (133-152)
  • Media perpetuates ideas of need for homogenous
    society
  • mega-malls
  • Media uses propaganda
  • Language is part of the propaganda campaign
  • NBC report p. 135 (again in 2007)
  • media coverage of English Only
  • keepers of the language appeal to their own
    authority
  • BBC good English (tape of film industry)
  • Stand. Lang. Ideology seeks to not eliminate all
    dialects languages, but socially unacceptable
    ones
  • hypercorrection (Whom, I, intrusive r)
  • Before the trial, one might gather that the
    majority of American citizens had never come in
    contact with evolutionary theory. After the
    trial, many of those people were thinking about
    their own beliefs, about science, and about the
    nature of authority and its relationship to
    knowledge (169). (Naomi)

4
Language vs. Dialect Issue
  • Ebonics decision in 1998 in Oakland
  • Original resolution
  • Tie to bilingual education
  • Bilingual education debate
  • Latinos and English Only
  • Newt Gingrich Comment

5
Court issues and business
  • Cant fire due to aesthetic judgments
  • Appalachia traceable to England and therefore
    protected (national origin discrimination)? p.
    154
  • Burden falls on complainant (disenfranchised and
    the unassimilated p. 157)
  • Court accepts argument that accent hurts business
  • opposite case in India
  • Court wont accept opinion of linguists because
    this challenges deep held convictions about
    language (p. 170)

6
Black English
  • Briefly because well come back
  • Whites note phonology and grammar
  • Blacks not just grammar
  • Strong quotes p. 183, 186
  • Christopher Darden
  • I disagree that "the day-to-day pressure to give
    up the home language is something that most
    non-AAVE speakers cannot imagine."  Lippi-Green
    contradicts her own point by noting that there
    are numerous marginalized groups that are
    confronted with the same pressure. (Anna)
  • If the destiny of the two language populations is
    indeed intertwined but even people within the
    African-American community are conflicted (like
    Oprah) about the use of AAVE, how are all of us
    to approach the use of AAVE outside of the
    African-American community?  (Laura)
  • We all discussed the Clinton incident in AL and
    how they reacted and took offense to it, but how
    is this different from Oprah switching back and
    forth?  Do we say that Oprah is ok with doing it
    because she is just going back to her roots, or
    should the Standard English speakers take
    offense because she is trying to relate to them
    by using their dialect or language? (Kevin)

7
Southern Dialect
  • earthy, family values, spiritual
  • hick, phony, superstitious
  • diagram on page 207 cant say who speaks this
    dialect, but the perception of those who do
  • popular culture Andy Griffith, Charles Kuralt
  • Kennesaw is mentioned!!
  • accent reduction classes
  • South and their feelings of guilt
  • North says any wisdom in sound is homegrown and
    not due to education
  • In real-life terms we see what instinctually and
    objectively we know to be true there is a great
    deal of diversity in the south (Angela)

8
Conclusions
  • Cant change system (though we should try) so at
    least draw attention to this form of
    discrimination
  • threats of not using MUSE are real
  • promises of using MUSE are illusory
  • New issue Internet and hypens

9
Agreements
  • Unless someone can actually evaluate the employee
    in their setting, how are they to judge if in
    fact they are not fulfilling the requirements?
    (Ashley)
  • A realistic goal must be a much smaller one to
    make people aware of the pocess of language
    subordination. To draw their attention to the
    misinformation, to expose false reasoning and
    empty promises to hard questions (Joel)
  • On the 16th June 1976, South African police
    opened fire on school children, killing a few and
    sending South Africa into a cycle of violence and
    conflict. The school children were resisting
    being forced to speak and learn in Afrikaans--the
    language of Apartheid. The language policy by the
    Apartheid government had been the final straw for
    the subordination of Africans. (Tania)
  • The reasoning seems to be that the logical
    conclusion to a successful civil rights movement
    is the end of racism, not because we have come to
    accept difference, but because we have eliminated
    difference (Sherie)

10
Your disagreements
  • Our goal in teaching Standard English to all of
    our students, other than being one of our
    occupational responsibilities, is to provide our
    students with the tools necessary for success in
    todays society. (Ashley)
  • I think she has been 'argueing' that every
    variety of English should be accepted on an equal
    footing, with no standards applied to any variety
    because the 'rules' and 'forms' are innate and do
    not interfere with one's ability to clearly
    communicate. I think Secondly, most of the
    examples she discusses at length deal primarily
    with the issue of accent, which, to my way of
    thinking, is a totally different issue than
    grammatical standards.  While grammatical rules
    and forms can be learned and applied in every
    situation, I do not think an individual can
    totally change their native accent or brogue
  • she's flipped out in promoting this premise
  • Lippi-Green seems to flip her entire premise and
    state that she is not opposed to English
    standards and preferences (Dixie)
  • The constant public debate on good English, on
    one right English, is as fruitless an exercise as
    the hypothetical congressional debate on the
    ideal height and weight for all adults (Joel)
  • Not a Lippi-Green quote, but . . . I told them
    there was one word that will mark them as
    uneducated (179). (Naomi)

11
More disagreements
  • The entire book had me conflicted. She had me
    struggling against my own "elitist" view of
    language and intelligence which was perhaps her
    main goal--to make us think and rethink our own
    positions on language and who we are as speakers
    of our own language. However, I still find
    myself leaning towards my perceptions of
    intelligent sounding language. I think to Winston
    Churchill, Marguerite Poland (a South African
    author whose eloquence in speaking was
    captivating), and the presidential candidates
    now--their ability to manipulate and deliver
    language had and has the power to move audiences.
    Can they do it in AAVE or  in a strong Southern
    accent? (Tania)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com