Title: Psychological Well Being Among People Attending the Better Health Self Management Course'
1Psychological Well Being Among People Attending
the Better Health Self Management Course.
Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health
Health Intervention Team School of Health
Social Sciences Coventry University
2Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health
3Self-management projects
- Arthritis self-management programme for
self-referred arthritis patients - Chronic Disease Course (LILL Project)
- Chronic Disease Course for Bengali speaking
participants - Non-attendance on the CDSMC
- Exercise on the CDSMC
- Chronic Disease Course for heart attack patients
- Chronic Disease Course for MS patients
- Tutors self management
- Arthritis self-management for GP referred OA
patients
4Study rationale
- Studies have not compared outcomes across illness
groups - UK government initiative
- Group processes
5Vicious Cycle
Disease Fatigue
Vicious cycle
Tense muscles
Difficult emotions
Stress/anxiety
Depression
6Phase I
- A comparison of five
- chronic illness groups
7Aim
- To compare the five chronic illness groups (CFS,
DM, ENDO, OP and PPS) in terms of illness
symptoms, psychological well-being and
self-efficacy.
8Study design
CDC Assessment ?
9Study Measures
- Visual Analogue Scale (Pain)
- Visual Analogue Scale (Fatigue)
- Self-efficacy for Disease
- Hospital Anxiety/Depression Scale
- Health Distress
10Sample (n162)
- Mean
- Age 53
- Disease duration (years) 16
-
- Gender Female 81
- Ethnic origin White/Eur. 97
- Comorbidity yes 67
11Main chronic condition
12Fatigue
13Pain
14Anxiety
15Depression
16Self-efficacy disease
17Self-efficacy symptoms
18Phase II
A qualitative study
19Aim
- To gain a greater insight into the group
processes among participants attending the CDSMP,
focusing on social comparisons.
20Design, sample analysis
- The study employed a cross-sectional design,
exploratory in nature. Data for Phase II was
collected at one point in time following course
attendance (four-months post-baseline). - A total of 15 respondents (13 women and 2 men)
who had enrolled on a CDSMP were purposively
selected. Interviewees had the following
illnesses CFS (n3), DM (n3), ENDO (n3), OP
(n3) and PPS (n3). - Qualitative data were analysed using content
analysis (CA) and drew on some of the principles
of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).
21Social comparison theory
- Our quest to know ourselves, about the search
for self-relevant information and how people gain
self-knowledge and discover reality about
themselves (Mettee and Smith 1977) - People wish to perceive themselves as superior
to others and they will in fact construct
perceptions of themselves and social reality that
support this wish to the maximum degree that
physical and social reality permit (Goethals et
al. 1991) -
-
22Social comparison theory Health research
- 69 of women with breast cancer thought their
prognosis was better than that of other women
(Stanton et al. 1999) - 73 thought they were better adjusted than other
women (Stanton et al. 1999) - 80 thought they were better adjusted than other
women (Wood et al. 1985)
23Social comparison theoryDownward comparison
- Downward comparisons are overwhelmingly more
frequent than upward comparisons among chronic
disease populations and are related to positive
affect and self-esteem - Downward comparisons may also serve to increase
anxiety as they serve to highlight potential
future worse deterioration
24Social comparison theoryUpward comparison
- Upward comparisons are a preferred source of
information about effective coping and a source
of inspiration and hope - Upward comparisons may also be de-motivating
serving as a reminder that one is not coping as
well one could or should
25Themes that emerged from interview analysis
- Comparing and learning
- Self-evaluation
- Self-enhancement
- Personality and social comparison
26Comparing and learning (I)
- You know I realised how important it is to keep
it Diabetes under control because I was the
only one that didnt have complications. I mean I
was just on one tablet, I mean some of them were
on all sorts of tablets and a lot of them didnt
have it under control and theyd got so many
different complications. I felt, gosh, I felt so
different when I came out I thought well, good
grief, you know. I mean there was one lady who
just forgot to take her tablets and you know I
mean stupid things like that. But I mean others
struggling with diets. So yes, it was ah, if I
dont look after myself, this is where youre
going to end up you know. I dont know if Ive
been the lucky one and theyve been the unlucky
ones, I dont know. I dont know but they all
seem to have a lot more problems then I had and,
I just thought, that does stick in my mind. P4,
DM
27Comparing and learning (II)
- I mean before I came back to England I didnt
even know what post-polio syndrome was. I
wouldnt necessarily have realized that such and
such could be down to a post-polio thing and I
would put it down to something else. Certainly
being on the course, you know kind of highlighted
that for me. P15, PPS - I hadnt realised that the symptoms I had was
part of the ENDO. P8, ENDO
28Self-evaluation (I)
- When you want to go out but you cant and you
say oh my god I get that, I didnt realise it
was because of the endometriosis. Because there
are so many different aspects of the disease you
start to worry if its the endometriosis thats
making me feel this way. And then when you have
12 people that are all saying, yes, I feel that
then you feel better already, and you know youre
not the only one. So I think the sharing yeah,
thats a great benefit. The sharing and the
understanding that we all have these certain
things. P9, ENDO - I didnt feel as if I was mad anymore because
every doctor Id ever been to made me feel as if
it was all in my head. But I was in a room full
of women who had exactly the same problems as
me. P8ENDO
29Self-evaluation (II)
- I think there are a lot of people that were on
the course who got a lot out of it because they
realised that they werent the only ones with
similar types of problems. I think collectively
you get something out of it dont you, whereas
individually you perhaps dont gain so much. You
sort of say oh yeah, thats a good idea. P13,
PPS - Well, yes, in so much as they've doctors been
asking me to change my insulin for quite a while
and it was only speaking to other people on the
CDSMP and realising that the insulin I was using
was getting a bit out of date and I needed
updating with it. It was only by speaking to
other people and saying well yes, I'm alright
even though any change you are rather feared a
bit. Going into the unknown, changing from one
machine to another but yes, I did do it and I
think it was through gaining confidence on the
course that gave me the well you must do it.
P5, DM
30Self-enhancement (I)? Comparison
- Well again I felt incredibly lucky because I
could actually use incredibly simple things to
manage the pain, whereas a lot of them seemed to
be totally intolerant to just about everything,
which is disastrous. I mean I dont know what
Id do if I was still waking up and feeling like
someone was stabbing me in the legs. So its
like a dreadful nightmarelt made me feel sort
of better, you know, what are you complaining
about, all these people, in wheelchairs or
whatever. P2, CFS - Well some were wheelchair bound, you know, so
obviously Im better then that. I felt I was at
the very top because of all the things, that Ive
kept up. P12, OP - Id always been recommended to go on an exercise
course, which is what I do. I have a relatively
good amount of movement, which is good. A lot of
other people actually werent doing anything, so
they didnt have very much movement, and they
looked to me, I mean in the six-weeks that we had
the course, it looked to me they hadnt fully
maintained their upright stature, you know. I
know, I know, I try to sort of relate it just to
myself, and sort of say but for the grace of God
I could be like that, Im jolly well going to
make sure I exercise all the time and not give in
to it and I want to sort of maintain as much of a
healthy lifestyle as is possible, you know.
P10, OP
31Self-enhancement (II)? Comparison
- I mean there was a couple of people there you
know, whod got HIV from being given infected
blood and how somebody like that can stay so
positive and optimistic and forward looking and
you know not be bitter. You know somebody like
that can be happy and positive, for goodness sake
so can I. P3CFS
32Self-enhancement (III) Not all comparisons are
beneficial!
- In some ways I envied them because they often
lived with someone and obviously that meant there
was help. P1, CFS - People had goals for example of filling the
freezer up with meals and I said I can have that
as a goal but I cant cook the meals and I
havent got any home help and they couldnt
relate to somebody not even having a family to
help them. P7, ENDO - I was one of the worst because I have to walk
with 2 sort of sticks and there were ladies there
that were walking not too bad, they were in their
first stages. They were interested in the fact
Id had it so long and Id got to the stage I was
and they wanted to prevent getting like I am.
P11OP
33Self-enhancement (IV)Finding something to focus
on
- Well I think there were some that were better
physically but actually having coped not that
well. I realised how mentally strong I was, but
then again Ive had it for longer then a lot of
people now, so Ive adjusted a bit more I think.
Physically though, I was a bit more conky than a
lot of them, but mentally I was doing a bit
better. P9, ENDO
34Social comparison and personality
- I always felt, people will say, that people who
have had polio are more resilient and have got
more sort of determination about them and they
have got that sort of get up and go sort of
attitude. Not one of the participants with polio
actually said they had suffered at all from the
effects of depression. That was an interesting
talk, but whether that has anything to do with
the symptoms of disease I am not sure, but
whether or not we are more optimistic than most
disabilities I dont know, but its an
interesting thought. P13, PPS
35Conclusions
- The current results confirm that a
self-management course can provide a unique
opportunity for people with chronic illness to
compare themselves with each other.
36Phase III
12-month follow-up
37Aims
- (i) To compare the change over time across five
chronic illness groups on illness symptoms,
psychological well-being and self-efficacy,
12-months following attendance on the CDSMP. - (ii) To determine whether there are differences
in personality traits across five chronic illness
groups. - (iii) To explore whether personality is
associated with change over time on illness
symptoms, psychological well-being and
self-efficacy.
38Fatigue (Scale 0-10, ? better)
39Pain(Scale 0-10, ? better)
40Anxious mood (Scale 0-21, ? better)
41Depressed Mood (Scale 0-21, ? better)
42Self-efficacy Disease(Scale 5-35, ? better)
43Self-efficacy Symptoms (Scale 5-35, ? better)
44The Big-Five
- Neuroticism- Characterized by negative
affectivity, nervousness and often refers to
maladjustment - Extraversion- Refers to energy or enthusiasm,
which is often displayed interpersonally in
sociability and dominance in high activity level
and cheerfulness - Openness- Refers to individuals who are
imaginative, aesthetically sensitive and
intellectually curious - Agreeableness- or altruism is a dimension that
determines trust, sympathy and cooperation - Conscientiousness- refers to control and
encompasses a sense of competence and sense of
duty, need for achievement, organization,
planning and self-discipline
45Neuroticism
46Extraversion
47Openness
48Associations personality change over time
49Limitations
- Small sample size
- Floor effects
- Volunteer bias
50Conclusions
- Results showed that 12-months following
attendance on the CDSMP, there were differences
both within and across illness groups on illness
symptoms, psychological well-being and
self-efficacy. Reassuringly, most groups improved
in the expected direction. Participants tended to
report improvements across the study variables
that were most pertinent to their specific
illness. For example, participants with CFS
reported significant improvements in fatigue
likewise participants with ENDO, for whom pain is
the greatest symptom, reported significant
improvements in pain. - This is the first study to examine the big
five-factors of personality among participants
attending the CDSMP. Results showed that there
were statistically significant differences both
within and across illness groups on the big
five-factors of personality. Moreover,
significant associations were evident with regard
to illness symptoms, psychological well-being and
self-efficacy. Of interest was that personality
was associated with change over time. These
findings are unique in that they extend the
current evidence base by comparing CDSMP
participants from five chronic illness groups by
focusing on personality.
51Future research suggestions
- Personality and the CDSMP
52Overall conclusions from PhD
- The findings clearly suggest that a generic
intervention that focuses on common illness
related problems (such as fatigue and pain) might
be effective in terms of change over time on
illness symptoms, psychological well-being and
self-efficacy among participants from five
chronic illnesses groups, attending illness
specific courses. - Social comparison and personality may mediate
outcomes following attendance on the CDSMP
53Self-management opportunities _at_Arthritis Victoria
- EMAIL
- georgieb_at_arthritisvic.org.au
- PHONE
- 8531 8015