Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria and Real Option Consideration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria and Real Option Consideration

Description:

If A, B, and C mutually exclusive, choose A (use NPV) when there is no capital ... May have contradictory decisions for mutually exclusive projects. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:231
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: busi98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria and Real Option Consideration


1
Chapter 9
  • Capital Budgeting Decision Criteria and Real
    Option Consideration

2
Evaluation Models
  • Net present value (NPV)
  • Profitability Index (PI)
  • Internal rate of return (IRR)
  • Payback (PB) period

3
NPV
  • NPV PVNCF - NINV
  • where
  • For independent projects, all projects with NPV ?
    0 is acceptable. For mutually exclusive
    projects, choose the one with the highest NPV.
  • Advantage consistent with SWM
  • Disadvantage absolute value, not relative

4
NPV -- example
  • Example 1 from Chapter 8.
  • NINV 62K
  • NCF15 14.4, 19.5, 27.55, 22.54, 34.46 K
  • Cost of capital 8

CF0 - 62, CF114.4, CF219.5, CF327.55,
CF422.54, CF534.46, I/YR8 gt NPV
29.94 CF0 0, CF114.4, CF219.5, CF327.55,
CF422.54, CF534.46, I/YR8 gt PVNCF 91.94
gtNPV91.94-6229.94
5
Profitability Index
  • PI PVNCF / NINV
  • For independent projects, all projects with PI ?
    1 is acceptable. Should yield identical
    decisions as NPV method.
  • For mutually exclusive projects, decision may be
    different from NPV method. Should consider other
    factors.

6
PI NPV -- example
  • Project A
  • PVNCF 92K
  • NINV 62K
  • NPV92-6230
  • PI92/621.48
  • Project C
  • PVNCF 20K
  • NINV 10K
  • NPV20-1010
  • PI20/102
  • Project B
  • PVNCF 27K
  • NINV 30K
  • NPV27-30-3
  • PI27/300.9
  • If A, B, and C independent, choose both A and
    C
  • If A, B, and C mutually exclusive, choose A
    (use NPV) when there is no capital rationing,
    choose C (use PI) when facing capital rationing.

7
Internal rate of return (1)
NPV PVNCF - NINV, where
IRR the rate of return that will make the
project break even (have a NPV0)
  • Example 1 from Chapter 8.
  • NINV 62K
  • NCF15 14.4, 19.5, 27.55, 22.54, 34.46 K

CF0 - 62, CF114.4, CF219.5, CF327.55,
CF422.54, CF534.46, gt IRR 22.66
8
IRR (2)
  • Decision rules
  • Independent projects all projects with
    r ? cost of capital
  • Mutually exclusive projects project with the
    highest r (r ? cost of capital)
  • Advantage takes account both the magnitude and
    the timing of cash flows
  • Disadvantage possible existence of multiple
    internal rate of returns

9
IRR NPV (1)
  • Identical decisions for independent projects
  • May have contradictory decisions for mutually
    exclusive projects.
  • NPV assumes cash flows are reinvested
    (compounded) at the firms cost of capital --
    more realistic
  • IRR assumes cash flows are reinvested
    (compounded) at IRR

10
IRR NPV (2)
  • Cost of capital 8
  • Project X
  • NINV 62K
  • NCF15 14.4, 19.5, 27.55, 22.54, 34.46
  • Project Y
  • NINV 62K
  • NCF15 0, 0, 10, 20, 120
  • Project X
  • NPVx29.25
  • IRRx22.66
  • Project Y
  • NPVy42.31
  • CF05 -62, 0, 0, 10, 20, 120
  • I/YR 8
  • IRRy 20.68
  • CF05 -62, 0, 0, 10, 20, 120
  • If X and Y independent, choose both X and Y
  • If X and Y mutually exclusive, choose X (use
    NPV)

11
Payback (PB) period
  • Undiscounted PB period
  • Discounted PB period
  • Special case undiscounted PB period of equal
    annual net cash flows
  • Example project X and Y

12
Homework
  • page 365-366, question 2, 3, 4, 5
  • page 367-371, problem 4, 9, 16, 18
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com