UW, Bothell Brand Audit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

UW, Bothell Brand Audit

Description:

The brand stands for something in the mind of the consumer. Not all brands are ... Benefits from Strong Brand. Better targeting- appropriate ... Branding ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: sandeep81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UW, Bothell Brand Audit


1
UW, Bothell Brand Audit
  • Sandeep Krishnamurthy
  • March 2001

2
Brand
  • A brand is the identity of a product or service.
  • It represents the essence of the product, its
    personality.
  • The brand stands for something in the mind of the
    consumer.
  • Not all brands are equally strong.

3
Indicators of Brand Strength
  • Awareness
  • Brand Image
  • Strength of Brand Associations
  • Favorability of Brand Associations
  • Uniqueness of Brand Associations
  • Consumer Attitude

4
Associations could include-
  • Product Attributes/Benefits
  • Sony VCR has a feature nobody else has.
  • Product Memories/Experiences/Images
  • We always have Sunny Delight for breakfast.
  • Feelings/Beliefs
  • Tide is the best detergent
  • Hyundai is a bad car
  • Product Folklore
  • We always have Coke for Thanksgiving dinner.
  • Kids in our family always go to UW.

5
Benefits from Strong Brand
  • Better targeting- appropriate students
    self-select
  • Easier recruitment of students
  • Greater loyalty from students, alumni,
    faculty/staff
  • Less vulnerability from competitors actions
  • Less vulnerability from crises
  • Greater community cooperation

6
What did we do?
  • First half of class focussed on branding theory.
  • Second half focussed on project.
  • Students were assigned to stakeholder groups and
    were asked to audit these groups.
  • Focus on awareness, perception, credibility and
    communication effectiveness.

7
A Comment
  • This projects focus was on qualitative/explorator
    y research.
  • We make no claims of statistical
    generalizability.
  • We recommend using this data as a stepping stone
    to conduct future survey research.

8
What we Found
  • Relationship to UW, Seattle unclear
  • UW, Seattle is a natural comparison point.
  • General public does not get the concept of
    tri-campus university.
  • They think of us as a branch campus and hence,
    are somewhat uneasy about coming here.

9
Recommendations
  • New logo-
  • UNIVERSITY OF W ASHINGTON
  • Bothell Seattle Tacoma
  • Font equality.
  • Training and communication of UW,S advisors and
    counselors
  • Present UW,B as an alternative EARLY- not when
    the student does not make it. Positive
    reference.
  • Joint recruiting at community colleges.
  • Area-based targeting?

10
What Students Like About UW, Bothell
  • Parking is easy.
  • Facilities are new and high-tech.
  • New computers.
  • Professors are approachable and student-friendly
  • Professors here, they actually teach. If they
    look at you eyeball-to-eyeball and if you are not
    getting it, they present it in another way.
  • Team-approach to learning.

11
What Students Miss at UW, B
  • Social Interaction
  • No clubs, interesting activities
  • No gym(why cant they use IMA?)
  • No cafeteria- YET
  • Limited Program Offerings
  • Announce new programs EARLY.
  • Low morale
  • They are insecure about the value of their
    education.
  • They tell everyone they go to UW and not UW,
    Bothell.

12
Thoughts on Cascadia
  • We better market to CCC students. They are not a
    gimme.
  • No transfer program
  • CCC students have not thought about what credits
    will transfer- may assume all will.
  • CC students generally leave their campus to
    attend 4 yr. college- will CCC students have a
    sense that going to UWB means staying home?

13
More Thoughts on Cascadia
  • Faculty/staff worried about excessively close
    relationship to CCC. e.g. Complaints about CCC
    link on our website, academic standards.
  • What needs to be done
  • Transfer program
  • Communication effort directed at CCC students and
    UW,B faculty/staff.
  • Sit in class program.

14
Web Activity
  • Link to UW, B on www.washington.edu has worked to
    raise awareness- BUT NOT KNOWLEDGE.
  • Faculty members(especially- but also others)
    complained about the quality of our website
  • DOES NOT COMMUNICATE KEY ATTRIBUTES.
  • Hard to locate information, not updated
    frequently, poor integration with UW, Seattle,
    white space.

15
Other Recommendations
  • Visit the campus program in summer and spring-
  • Open to general community.
  • Run by student volunteers.
  • Barbecue?
  • Sell UW, Bothell merchandise at all UBS stores-
    i.e., Seattle and Bellevue.
  • Direct mailing of class catalogs to households on
    Eastside and Northside.
  • Information booths at CC and other regional
    events.
  • Promote successful Bothell graduates.
  • Emphasize any professors that teach on both
    campuses to show Bothells credibility.

16
Branding Challenges
  • With most groups, awareness has been achieved-
    the challenge is to gain credibility.
  • What is needed is a clear and coherent message
    that resonates with all stakeholder groups.
  • Major work needs to be done on our website if it
    must appear credible.
  • Survey research.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com