Title: Bunkering in the 21st Century
1Bunkering in the 21st Century
- G.R.Bowler,Inc. Marine Controls
- 2261 Lake Rd.
- Ontario,NY 14519 USA
- www.grbowler.com
- 315-524-8750
2Benefits of 1 Measurement Improvement
- Bunker represents 50-70 of total ship operating
expense - Example Large container ship-7,750 TEU
- Last summer bunkers _at_ 500/tn 30M
- Now 335/tn 13.4M
- Next summer ????
- What does a 1 measurement improvement mean to
you? - Last summer 300K potential savings
- Today 134k potential savings
- Reduced billing discrepancies
- The technology is here today that can benefit
suppliers, barge operators and shipping companies
3Agenda
- Bunker Sources of Error
- Custody Transfer Challenges
- Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
- Questions
4Bunker Sources of Error
1 cm tape error 0.25 error for a 4m
level Potential savings on 9000 tonne stem
7,500
Bunker Tank
5Bunker Sources of Error Temperature
- Placement of temperature probe is critical for
optimum volume to mass conversion - Is the temperature measurement representative of
total bunker? - Average calculation vs single point
- Savings can be significant
- 2C error on temp (avg) 0.1 error for a 991g/l
product at 50C - Savings
6Sources of Error - Density Stratification
Errors of 0.25 to 1.5 possible
Tank Stratification
Tank B
7Bunker Sources of Error Entrained Gas
- Consider a Bunker with 5 entrained gas
- A volume measurement will give a batch error of
5 - Effect on mass measurement is negligible
- Drive Gain can be used to indicate presence of EG
5 error 151K potential loss
8Bunker Sources of Error Volume to Mass
Conversion
Conversion formula Actual volume gt net volume gt
weight(vac) gt weight(air) (?) calc error
Volume-based Measurement
Direct Mass Measurement
BDN
Automated
Manual
9Agenda
- Bunker Sources of Error
- Custody Transfer Challenges
- Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
- Questions
10Custody Transfer Processes
- Custody transfer is simply an agreement between
two Parties Buyer and Seller - However, the Bunkering process is not so simple
11Everyday Custody Transfer Examples
Pipelines
Truck Dispensing
Well Head
Retail Dispensing
Truck/Ship Loading
12Bunker Fuel Custody Transfer
- Repeatable, accurate measurement globally
accepted - Reasonable capital costs to support operations
- Lifecycle cost considered for operational
efficiency
Bunkering custody transfer needs are the same as
other industries
- Make sure Im getting what Im paying for
- Eliminate idle/downtime due to refueling
operation - Reduce the number of billing discrepancies and
arbitration claims
Operating Vessel
Barge
Fuel Storage Terminal
13Bunker Fuel Custody Transfer Challenges
- Actual Operational Challenges
- Inherent differences between tank measurements
- Entrained gas (Air bubbles)
- Product holdup in barge pipelines
- Placement of meter for buyers confidence
- Potential for backflow through meter
- During Validation
- Volume to mass conversions
- Temperature compensations
- Stacked uncertainties of reference system
- Product quality concerns
Operating Vessel
Barge
Fuel Storage Terminal
14Agenda
- Bunker Sources of Error
- Custody Transfer Challenges are not New to
Emerson - Coriolis Technology at Work
- Questions
15Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
- Three phase test program in execution
- Phase 1 Load barge _at_ refinery via Micro Motion
meter in both ideal and non-ideal conditions - Phase 2 Dispense bunker fuel into a vessel via
the Micro Motion meter in both ideal and
non-ideal conditions - Phase 3 Use a vessel installed meter to measure
incoming fuel for both ideal and non ideal
conditions.
16Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
- Micro Motion Coriolis test program is complete
and successful - Final data being prepared for discussion
17Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
Micro Motion ELITE High Capacity Coriolis Meters
Size Flow Range HC2 750 Tn HC3 1275
Tn HC4 2100 Tn
18Micro Motion Coriolis Technology at Work
- Sufficient data to MID certify
- Barge loading
- Barge dispensing
- Ship receiving
- Testing supports a 0.5 bunker delivery accuracy
- Savings potential expected to be significant
19Thank You !