Tests of linear beta pricing models (I)

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Tests of linear beta pricing models (I)

Description:

Linear beta pricing models. Conditional and unconditional MV ... ? is the vector of expected returns on the benchmark portfolios in excess of the zero-beta rate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tests of linear beta pricing models (I)


1
Tests of linear beta pricing models (I)
  • FINA790C
  • Spring 2006
  • HKUST

2
Outline
  • Linear beta pricing models
  • Conditional and unconditional MV efficiency
  • Base case Maximum likelihood methods with
    conditional homoscedasticity
  • Non-traded factors
  • Traded factors
  • Example riskfree rate, traded factors
  • Extensions
  • GMM
  • Cross-sectional regression methodology

3
SDF once again
  • Suppose there is a stochastic discount factor
    mt1 such that Etmt1Rit1 1
  • Consider the portfolio p with maximal correlation
    with m
  • mt1 ?0t ?1tRpt1 ?t1
  • The asset z whose return is uncorrelated with m
    and p has conditional expected return 1/Etmt1
    (riskfree rate if it exists)

4
Linear beta pricing
  • This gives pricing relation in terms of z and p
  • EtRit1 EtRzt1 ßipt1(EtRpt1-EtRzt1
    )
  • From efficient set mathematics this is equivalent
    to saying that portfolio p is on the minimum
    variance frontier
  • OR we can just assume that mt1 is a linear
    function of pre-specified factors

5
Identifying the factors
  • Theoretical arguments or economic intuition
  • Sharpe-Lintner-Black CAPM
  • Intertemporal CAPM
  • Consumption CAPM
  • Statistical factors
  • Empirical anomalies
  • Size, book-to-market, momentum

6
The role of conditioning information
  • Theory is usually stated in terms of conditional
    expectations but we dont know what is in
    investors information sets
  • What is the relationship between unconditional
    minimum variance and conditional minimum
    variance?
  • If a portfolio is unconditionally minimum
    variance then it must be conditionally minimum
    variance, but if it is conditionally minimum
    variance that does not imply that it is
    unconditionally minimum variance

7
Linear beta pricing models
  • Suppose the return generating process for each of
    N assets follows a K-factor linear model
  • Rit ai ftßi uit
  • Euitft 0 , i1,,N
  • where ßi is the Kx1 vector of betas for asset i
  • ßi ?f-1 E(Rit E(Rit))(ft E(ft)) and
  • ?f E(ft-E(ft))(ft-E(ft))

8
Linear beta pricing models
  • Then the linear beta pricing model says
  • E(Rit) ?0 ?ßi
  • where ?0 , ? are constants
  • ?j is the risk premium for factor j (the
    expected return on a portfolio of the N assets
    which has beta of 1 on factor j and beta of 0 for
    all other factors)

9
Estimating testing linear beta pricing model
  • We can estimate and test the model using maximum
    likelihood methods if we make distributional
    assumptions for returns and factors
  • Collect the N returns and K factors
  • Rt a Bft ut where a µR - BµF
  • and suppose that ut is iid multivariate normal
    N(0, ?u) conditional on contemporaneous and past
    values of the factors

10
Maximum likelihood estimation
  • The log likelihood of the unconstrained model is
  • L -½NTln(2p) -½Tln(?u)-½?(Rt-a-Bft)?u-1(Rt-a
    -Bft)
  • So the estimators are
  • a µR Bµf
  • B (1/T)?(RtµR)(ftµf)?f-1
  • where µR (1/T) ?Rt µf (1/T) ?ft
  • ?f (1/T)?(ftµf)(ftµf)
  • ?u (1/T)?(Rt-a-Bft)(Rt-a-Bft)

11
Maximum likelihood estimation
  • For the constrained model a ?01B(?- µf)
  • The constrained ML estimators are let ? ?- µf
  • Bc (1/T)?(Rt?01)(ft?)(1/T)?
    (ft?)((ft?)-1
  • ?uc (1/T)?(Rt- ?01-Bc(ft?)) (Rt-
    ?01-Bc(ft?))
  • ? (?0 ?) Z?uc -1Z-1Z?uc-1(µR
    Bcµf)
  • where Z 1 Bc
  • The estimators can be computed by successive
    iteration

12
Testing
  • The asymptotic variance of ? is
  • (1/T)1(?µf)?f-1(?µf)Z?uc-1Z-1
  • The LRT statistic is
  • JLR -T ln(?u) ln(?uc)
  • We can recover the factor risk premiums ? from
    ? ? µf which has asymptotic variance
    (1/T)?f var(?)

13
Traded factors
  • When the factors are traded then
  • Factors ft are returns on benchmark portfolios.
    Estimators for the unconstrained model are
    exactly the same (under this new interpretation
    of the factors)
  • ? is the vector of expected returns on the
    benchmark portfolios in excess of the zero-beta
    rate
  • So the restriction on a is ?01-?0B1
  • ?0(1-B1)

14
Traded factors - constrained model
  • Estimators for the constrained model are
  • Bc(1/T)?(Rt?01)(ft?01)(1/T)?(ft?01
    )(ft?01)-1
  • ?uc (1/T)?(Rt- ?01-Bc(ft?01))(Rt-?01-Bc
    (ft?01))
  • ?0 (1- Bc1)?uc -1(1- Bc1)-1(1-
    Bc1)?uc -1(µRBcµf)
  • The asymptotic variance of ?0
  • (1/T)1(µf-?01)?f-1(µf-?01)(1-Bc1)?uc-
    1(1-Bc1)-1
  • We can recover the factor risk premiums ? from
  • ? µf-?01 which has asymptotic variance
    (1/T)?f var(?0)11

15
Simple case
  • Suppose there is a riskfree asset with rate rf,
    and there is only one factor rM (the
    Sharpe-Lintner CAPM)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)