Title: Rational for Financial Sustainability Planning within the Immunization Sector
1Rational for Financial Sustainability Planning
within the Immunization Sector
2Defining Financial Sustainability
- Although self-sufficiency is the ultimate goal,
in the nearer term, sustainable financing is the
ability of a country to mobilize and efficiently
use domestic and supplementary external resources
on a reliable basis to achieve target levels of
immunization performance in terms of access,
utilization, quality, safety and equity. - - GAVI Board, London, June 2001
3The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization
(GAVI)
- Alliance of major partners working to support
immunization - Focus on collaboration and coordination to
support achievement of global milestones - Reviews country applications for immunization
support
4What is the Vaccine Fund?
- Organization raising funds to support
immunization programmes - Focus on 75 countries of the world with
GNP/Capita less than 1000 - Supports countries to introduce Hepatitis B, Hib,
and yellow fever vaccines auto disable syringes
and strengthening of delivery services
5What do GAVI and the Vaccine Fund do?
- Provide additional resources to increase
coverage, improve program safety efficiency,
introduce newer vaccines - Improve partner coordination and contributions
- Support essential information systems and
capacity building - Foster movement toward sustainable financing
- Evolution toward adequacy and reliability in both
domestic and external resources to meet expanding
program objectives - Improvement in program efficiency and financial
management
6What is the relationship between GAVI and the
Vaccine Fund?
- Partners
- GAVI determines the policies for using the
- resources in the Vaccine Fund
- Vaccine Fund raises money to support GAVI
- policies
7Vaccine Fund Investments
- Additive Catalytic
- Support national plans
- Medium-term - 3 to 5 year commitments
- Assumes a transition of financial responsibility
from Vaccine Fund to governments and partners - Recapitalized to support new set of national
priorities - Challenge transition of financial responsibility
8Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
9Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (Hep B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
10Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (Hep B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
11Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (next priorities)
Vaccine Fund (Hep B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
12Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (next priorities)
Vaccine Fund (HepB B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
13Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (AIDs, Malaria, TB?)
Vaccine Fund (next priorities)
Vaccine Fund (HepB B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
14Vaccine Fund Catalyzing funding for vaccine
introduction
Vaccine Fund (AIDs, Malaria, TB?)
Vaccine Fund (next priorities)
Vaccine Fund (HepB B, Hib, YF)
Government/Partners
5
10
20
Years
15Percentage Change in Programme Costs with New
Vaccine Introduction
350
299
300
250
increase/decrease in
200
178
routine program costs
following GAVI-VF support
150
112
100
80
50
33
19
18
12
13
3
0
Mali
Kenya
Malawi
Ghana
Guyana
Rwanda
Lao PDR
Cambodia
Mozambique
UR Tanzania
DPT-HepB-
DPT-HepB
DPT-HepB-Hib
YF
Hib YF
16Common Problems in Immunization Financing (1)
- Continuous increases in program costs resulting
from improvements and expansions - Inadequate, unpredictable national resources
- MOH budgets limited and unprotected from economic
shocks
17Common Problems in Immunization Financing (2)
- Unpredictable external resources
- Support tied to partner priorities
- Traditional dependence on partners
- Vulnerable to changing partner trends
- Less than optimal attention paid to program
inefficiencies - Challenging systems for financial management
- Budgetary allocations based on low vaccine costs
18Meeting the Challenge
- Multiyear plans applications did not include
rigorous financial analyses nor plans for
addressing resource gaps - GAVI requirement 2 years after initial Vaccine
Fund award - Established consultative process for determining
how to support countries improve the financial
sustainability of immunization efforts
19Overall Approach of FSPs (1)
- Link program objectives/changes to financing
implications - Start with program objectives and improvements
- Estimate costs of different scenarios
- Consider financial management and human capacity
needs - Consider larger changes in health and
government/partner financing
20Overall Approach of FSPs
- Provide basic information for all interested
parties to see and discuss - Initiate a process of dialogue and planning which
will need to continue - Establishes clear picture of financing, human
resource, and management needs based on good
data and analyses - Describes realistic and specific actions that
will increase likelihood of FS - Legitimize small steps towards sustainability
21Benefits for Countries
- Understanding program costs and financing
- Identify process and indicators for monitoring
progress - Advocacy opportunity - within MOH, with MOF,
among Partners - Feeds into and informs broader macroeconomic
processes (PRSP/HIPC etc.)
22Benefits of FSPs For GAVI Partners/Vaccine Fund
- Understand program costs, financing available,
resource environment, and resulting financing
gaps - Appreciate planned national actions
- Identify additional actions that partners must
take at both national and global levels - Assist in efforts to improve vaccine security
23Major Challenges for the FSPs
- Generate sufficient and strategic information not
be an excessive reporting burden - Meet government needs but fulfill a GAVI/VF
requirement - Be driven by data of reasonable quality not
bogged down in data requirements - Be usable in wide range of contexts (e.g. SWAps,
MTEFs)
24Concerns
- FSPs are too ambitious and complicated
- FSPs estimates should be more accurate
- FSPs are needed for entire health sector
- Country ownership is key
- Sustainability issues are global, not national
- FSPs are inconsistent with country planning and
budgeting processes
25FSPs are a step
- FSP will kick off the debate and provide data and
analyses to inform discussions and planning - Development of an FSPs will not make programs
financially sustainable - Start to a process which requires continuing work
26Immunization Financing Strategies and Options
27Immunization Financing Strategies
- 1. Mobilize additional resources from
- national and external sources
- 2. Improve program efficiency to minimize
- additional resources needed
- 3.Increase the reliability of resources
28Mobilizing Adequate Resources
- Increasing government contribution to
immunization - Increasing external contribution to immunization
- Identifying new sources of funding (HIPC,
sub-national governments)
29Sources of Finance for Immunization from DOMESTIC
Resources
30Sources of Finance for Immunization from EXTERNAL
Resources
312. Improving Programme Efficiency
- Training Staff
- Reducing vaccine wastage
- Improving transparency of funding flows
- Reducing corruption
- Improving efficiency of transportation
- Rationalizing procurement of vaccines and
equipment
32Reducing Vaccine Wastage
- Implement the WHO open vial policy
- Strengthen vaccine storage and management
- Increase the number of children at each outreach
session - IEC to increase attendance
- Modify schedules
- But, there are trade-offs
333. Increasing Funding Reliability
- Advocating for longer term commitments from all
funding sources - Improving financial management to improve,
timeliness and transparency of allocation and use
of funds - Developing a reserve or emergency funding
mechanism
34Challenges and Constraints
- Increasing funding needs -- population growth,
program improvements - Culture of reliance on external funding
- Government commitment not translated into
funding - Unreliable donor funding
- Program inefficiency high vaccine wastage,
sub-optimal allocation of resources - SWAp, decentralization change funding flows
35Opportunities
- Economic growth and increasing government revenue
- Increasing financing for health sector (PRSP)
- Increasing government commitment to immunization
- Increasing external support
- Improving program efficiency
- SWAp, decentralization change resource decision
makers - New donors, NGOs
- Regional development banks