Fundamental Ideas I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

Fundamental Ideas I

Description:

Advertising Research. COPY TESTING. Ad executions. Diagnostic and predictive. Many validity issues ... we that X--the advertising--caused O--the measured ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: edwardfmcq
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fundamental Ideas I


1
Fundamental Ideas (I)
  • Must assess cost of information, relative to
    reward value of that information, itself weighted
    by the certainty of achieving those rewards
  • Perfect data can cost a perfectly outrageous
    amount of money!
  • Relatively invalid data cant deliver much in the
    way of reward
  • Situations low in risk cant justify much
    expenditure on advertising research.

2
Advertising Research
  • COPY TESTING
  • Ad executions
  • Diagnostic and predictive
  • Many validity issues
  • Low cost
  • Very important, some of the time
  • CAMPAIGN EVALUATION
  • Multi-month effort
  • Summary and descriptive
  • Few validity issues
  • High cost
  • Generally important, much of the time

3
Tracking Study--Measures
  • Driven by hierarchy of effects
  • Awareness
  • What brands of X can you name?
  • Knowledge
  • T/F, or agree/disagree, or attribute prompt
  • Brand Liking
  • Adjectives, superiority, perceptions
  • Preference
  • Rank order, one best
  • Usage

4
Copy Tests
  • Key questions
  • Exploratory or confirmatory in intent?
  • What consumer response is the focus?
  • Some possibilities
  • Interviews of various kinds (very diagnostic)
  • Theater tests (more confirmatory--preference--some
    diagnostics)
  • In-home (typically recall)
  • Coupon (near facsimile of sales)
  • Physiological (beware this Shangri La of
    advertising testing!)

5
Fundamental Ideas Relevant to Advertising
Research (II)
  • Internal vs. External Validity
  • Internal how confident are we that X--the
    advertising--caused O--the measured outcome?
  • Was it really the co-presence of Y that produced
    O?
  • Did Z produce both X and O?
  • The key idea is control--minimizing alternative
    explanations/plausible rival hypotheses
  • External how likely would we be to obtain the
    same results, in the real context of interest, as
    in the controlled circumstances of the test?
  • The key idea is proximal similarity--reproducing
    in the test the key aspects of the context
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com