Comparing groups using conditional probabilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparing groups using conditional probabilities

Description:

Odds of Not Having a Tattoo. For males. 0.8222/0.1778 to 1 = 74/16 to 1 = 4.6 to 1 ... 9.9 females I find without a tattoo, I'll find one female with a tattoo. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: patqbu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparing groups using conditional probabilities


1
Comparing groups using conditional probabilities
  • Relative risk and related measures...

2
Plaque Breaks and Heart Attacks
3
The comparison
0.68/0.21 3.24
Men who died during strenuous activity were more
than 3 times as likely to have ruptured plaque
than men who engaged in normal activity.
4
Relative risk
Relative Risk P(DiseasedExposed) P(Diseased
Unexposed)
5
Example Gender and Tattoos
Rows gender Columns tattoo
N Y All
M 74 16 90
82.22 17.78 100.00
F 79 8 87 90.80
9.20 100.00 All 153 24 1
77 86.44 13.56 100.00 Cell Content
s -- Count
of Row
6
The comparison
0.1778/0.0920 1.93
Males in Fall 1998 Stat 250 classes are almost
twice (2 times) as likely to have a tattoo than
females in Fall 1998 Stat 250 classes.

7
Interpretation of relative risk
Relative risk of 1 means that each exposed
group is equally likely to have the disease.
10 of students who take Stat 250 appreciate
statistics 10 of students who dont take Stat 25
0 appreciate statistics RR of appreciating statis
tics 0.10 /0.10 1
8
Alternatively
1.93 - 1.00 0.93 ? 100 93
Males in Fall 1998 Stat 250 classes are 93
percent more likely to have a tattoo than females
in Fall 1998 Stat 250 classes.
9
Increased risk
Increased risk (Relative Risk - 1.00) ? 100
10
Increased risk
Increased risk can be negative! If so, it is a
decreased risk.
IR (0.70 - 1.00) 100 -30
The researchers found that even occasional
exercisers, those who did less than the
equivalent of six brisk half-hour walks a month,
were 30 percent less likely to die than their
sedentary twins.
11
Caution!
  • Relative risk and increased risk by themselves
    are not sufficient. Critical that you also know
    the conditional probabilities.
  • RR 0.005/0.001 5
  • RR 0.5/0.1 5
  • Relative risk of 5 is very different in each of
    these cases!

12
Odds
  • If P(event) is p, then odds in favor of event is
    p/(1-p) to 1.
  • If m number with trait and n number without
    trait, then odds in favor of event is m/n to
    1.

13
Interpreting odds
Odds 10 to 1 For every 10 students who didnt s
leep enough last night, Ill find 1 who did sleep
enough.
Odds 3 to 2 For every 3 students who do their h
omework daily, Ill find 2 students who dont do
their homework daily.
14
Example Gender and Tattoos
Rows gender Columns tattoo
N Y All
M 74 16 90
82.22 17.78 100.00
F 79 8 87 90.80
9.20 100.00 All 153 24 1
77 86.44 13.56 100.00 Cell Content
s -- Count
of Row
15
Odds of Not Having a Tattoo
For males 0.8222/0.1778 to 1 74/16 to 1 4.6 t
o 1 For every 4.6 males I find without a tattoo,
Ill find one male with a tattoo.
For females 0.9080/0.0920 to 1 79/8 to 1 9.9
to 1 For every 9.9 females I find without a tatto
o, Ill find one female with a tattoo.
16
Odds ratio
The ratio of two odds, that is, the odds for one
group divided by the odds for another group.
17
The comparison
Odds ratio (79/8)/(74/16) 9.9/4.6 2.15
The odds of finding a female without a tattoo is
2.15 times that of the odds of finding a male
without a tattoo.
18
What to know?
  • Calculation of RR, IR, odds, OR
  • Interpretation of RR, IR, odds, OR
  • Relationship between RR and IR
  • Relationship between probability and odds
  • Importance of knowing probabilities and not just
    RR and IR
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com