Sampling Procedures in Marketing Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Sampling Procedures in Marketing Research

Description:

... research: telephone directory. Sampling Frame ... telephone directory, card index) ... Telephone Surveys. Directory Assisted vs. Random Digit Dialing (RDD) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:451
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: brianj80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sampling Procedures in Marketing Research


1
Sampling Procedures in Marketing Research
  • Chapter 12

2
Chapter Topics
  • Process of sample planning
  • Should we take a census (complete canvas) or a
    sample?
  • What kind of sample should be taken?
  • What size should the sample be?
  • Telephone sampling

3
Sampling Objectives
  • Two broad objectives to the use of samples
  • Estimation
  • Testing of hypotheses
  • Each objective involves making inferences about a
    population on the basis of information from a
    sample

4
Precision vs. Accuracy
  • Precision in sampling relates to sampling error
    and the SIZE of the confidence limits of an
    estimate (errors of DEGREE)
  • Accuracy in sampling relates to non-response
    bias, memory error, misunderstood questions,
    problematic definition of terms, and processing
    errors (errors of KIND)

5
Process of Sample Selection
Define population
Census vs. sample
Sample design
Sample size
Estimate costs of sampling
Execute sampling process
6
Define Population
  • Population all units or elements possessing
    particular relevant features or characteristics
    in common, to which one desires to generalize
    study results
  • Defining a population requires specifying
  • Which elements are included (WHAT)
  • Location (WHERE)
  • Time frame (WHEN)
  • One of the most difficult tasks in sampling

7
Census or Sample?
  • Census
  • ALL members of the chosen population
  • Pros
  • Higher level of confidence
  • Preferred when
  • attribute of interest occurs rarely in the
    population
  • Population is small
  • Variance in characteristic being measured is high
  • Cost of error is high
  • Cons
  • More timely to complete
  • Oftentimes more costly when compared to sampling
  • Relatively less effort to complete than sampling
  • Sample
  • A SUBSET of the chosen population
  • Pros
  • Less time to complete
  • Better for controlling non-sampling errors
  • More detailed information possible
  • Sample more available than entire population
  • Less costly than census
  • Cons
  • Relatively more effort to complete than census

8
Sample Design
  • 1. Are the survey objectives stated precisely?
  • 2. Are the eligibility criteria clear and
    definite?
  • 3. Are rigorous sampling methods chosen?
  • 4. What type of sample should be used?
  • 5. What is the appropriate sampling unit?
  • 6. What frame is available for the population and
    what problems might arise?
  • 7. How are refusals and non-response to be
    handled?

9
Type of Sample
  • Probability sampling
  • Allows for bias-free selection of sample units
  • Permits the measurement of sampling error
  • Non-probability sampling
  • Relies on the expertise of the person taking the
    sample
  • For a given cost, one can normally select a
    larger non-probability sample than probability
    sample

10
Sampling Unit
  • The basis of the sampling procedure
  • A segment of the population actually chosen by
    the sampling process
  • Can be individual elements (e.g. parent) or
    aggregates of individual elements (e.g. entire
    household)

11
Sample Frame
  • Usually a physical listing of the sampled
    elements selected
  • Incomplete frames or frames too comprehensive can
    lead to coverage error
  • Most widely used frame in survey research
    telephone directory

12
Sampling Frame - Population
13
Sample Size
  • 4 ways to determine sample size
  • Arbitrarily or judgmentally determined
  • Minimum cell size needed for analysis
  • Budget-based
  • Specifying a desired precision in advance

14
Costs of Sampling
  • Overhead costs
  • Relatively fixed
  • Variable costs
  • dependent on scope of study
  • High costs often lead to changes in sample
    design and/or smaller-sized samples

15
Execute Sampling Process
  • A sample must be
  • Representative
  • Mirrors the various patterns and subclasses of
    the population
  • Adequate
  • Sufficient size to provide confidence in
    stability of samples characteristics
  • Requires precise measurement

16
Non-probability Sampling Procedures
  • Quota
  • Judgment
  • Convenience
  • Snowball (multiplicity)
  • Definition sample elements do not have a known,
    nonzero chance of being selected for the sample

17
Quota Sampling
  • Most commonly employed non-probability sampling
    procedure
  • Sizes of various subclasses of the population are
    first estimated from some outside source (ex.
    Bureau of the Census data)
  • Advantages
  • Lower costs
  • Great convenience in selecting respondents
  • Disadvantages
  • Potentially many sources of selection bias

18
(No Transcript)
19
Judgment Sampling
  • Using sound judgment or expertise to carefully
    and consciously choose the elements
  • Intent is to select elements in such a way that
    errors of judgment in the selection will cancel
    each other out
  • Disadvantages
  • No way of knowing if typical cases are, in fact,
    typical without external check or objective basis
  • Its value depends entirely upon expert judgment
    of researcher
  • Advantages
  • Inexpensive
  • Convenient to use
  • Less time-consuming
  • Results as good as probability sampling

20
Judgment Sampling Examples
A company wants to know why its new products
failed and conducts surveys on competitors for
products similar or related to those it produced.
Should a Company begin marketing in a foreign
market? Choose specific international banking
personnel and government trade specialists as a
judgment sample to provide the information.
21
Convenience Sampling
  • Generic term for a variety of ad hoc procedures
    for selecting respondents
  • Example
  • typical cities chosen as test markets due to
    their demographic make-up (New York, Fort Worth)
  • intercept interviews in shopping malls
  • Tear-out questionnaire in magazine/newspaper
  • Disadvantages
  • May lead to length-biased data
  • Advantages
  • Sampling units are accessible, convenient, and
    cooperative

22
Snowball Sampling
  • Generic term for a variety of ad hoc procedures
    for selecting respondents
  • Example
  • Random telephone call and regardless of who
    answers, ask if they know anyone else who meets
    the qualifications of the survey.
  • Focus on a list of qualified individuals then
    ask for two referrals.
  • Focus on rare groups identified by. Experiences
    (medical history), Interests (expert mountain
    bikers), or Opinions (group membership)
  • Advantages
  • Sampling units are described as rare, but
    accessible, convenient, and cooperative. Low cost
  • Disadvantages
  • May lead to sub-classification

23
Probability Sampling Designs
  • Simple Random Sampling
  • Systematic Sampling
  • Stratified Sampling
  • Cluster Sampling
  • Area Sampling

24
Simple Random Sampling
  • Best known type of probability sample
  • Each sample element has a known and equal
    probability of selection, and each possible
    sample of n elements has a known and equal
    probability of being the sample actually selected
  • It is drawn by a random procedure from a sample
    frame
  • Difficult to obtain a sampling frame that permits
    a simple random sample to be drawn
  • Not widely used in marketing research

25
Systematic Sampling
  • Each sample element has a known and equal
    probability of selection
  • If the population contains N ordered elements and
    a sample size n is desired, find the ratio of N/n
    and round to nearest integer to obtain sampling
    interval
  • Example population of 600, sample of 60 ?
    sampling interval is 10 ? random number of 4
    selected between 1-10. Sample elements become 4,
    14, 24, etc.
  • Assumes that population elements are ordered in
    some fashion (ex. telephone directory, card
    index)
  • Can be more reliable (i.e. lower sampling error)
    than simple random sampling

26
Stratified Sampling
  • A simple random sample taken from each stratum of
    interest in the population
  • In proportionate stratified sampling, sample
    drawn from each stratum is made proportionate in
    size to the relative size of that stratum in the
    total population
  • In disproportionate stratified sampling, one
    departs from preceding proportionality by taking
    other circumstances into account (e.g. relative
    size of stratum variances)
  • Sample size needs to be calculated for each
    stratum
  • Sample selection can be time-consuming and costly
    if many stratums are used

27
Cluster Sampling
  • A simple random or stratified sample is selected
    of all primary sample units, each containing more
    than one sample element all elements within the
    selected primary units are then sampled
  • Example If researcher chooses to sample city
    blocks and interviews families residing in the
    blocks, the blocks, not the individual families,
    would be selected at random
  • Lower interviewing costs

28
Area Sampling
  • Sampling of geographical areas (ex. counties,
    blocks)
  • If only one level of sampling takes place before
    the elements are sampled, it is a single-stage
    area sample
  • If one or more successive samples within the
    larger area are taken before settling on the
    final clusters, it is a multistage area sample

29
Telephone Surveys
  • Directory Assisted vs. Random Digit Dialing (RDD)
  • Best-known method is the Mitofsky-Waksberg method
    of random digit dialing
  • Answering Machines lower chance, but higher
    participation rate
  • Caller ID allows people to screen calls
  • Kish technique

30
Telephone Sampling Procedures
31
International Research
  • International sampling involves the need to
    balance within-country representativeness with
    cross-national comparability
  • Well-defined sample frames do not exist in all
    foreign markets
  • Comparative and theoretical types of
    international research allows for non-probability
    sampling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com