CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED TESTICULAR GERMCELL TUMORS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED TESTICULAR GERMCELL TUMORS

Description:

Absence of non-pulmonary. visceral metastasis and. AFP 1000 ng/ml and ... visceral metastasis and. 1000 AFP 10,000 ng/ml or. 5000 hCG 50,000 UI/ml or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Cul6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED TESTICULAR GERMCELL TUMORS


1
CHEMOTHERAPY FORADVANCED TESTICULAR GERM-CELL
TUMORS
  • GOOD-RISK DISEASE
  • S. Culine
  • CHU Henri Mondor
  • Créteil, France

2
Objectives
  • Definition
  • Advanced disease
  • Good risk
  • Optimal chemotherapy

3
Advanced disease
  • Definition
  • A wrong one !

4
Advanced disease
  • Definition
  • Abnormal CT scan
  • (? IIC in seminoma)
  • or
  • No normalisation
  • of serum tumor markers

5
Good risk
  • IGCCCG classification
  • Absence of non-pulmonary
  • visceral metastasis and
  • AFP lt 1000 ng/ml and
  • hCG lt 5000 IU/ml and
  • LDH lt 1.5 N
  • IGCCCG, J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15 594

6
Prognosis
  • IGCCCG classification
  • Non seminoma Seminoma
  • 56 of cases 90 of cases
  • 5-year survival 5-year survival
  • 92 86

7
Optimal chemotherapy
  • The cornerstone trials
  • SECSG
  • 4 BEP gt 4 PVB
  • Equal efficacy, lesser toxicity
  • Williams SD, N Engl J Med, 1987, 316 1435

8
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 1987
  • 4 cycles
  • Bleomycin 30 mg/w
  • Etoposide 100 mg/m2/d d1 to d5
  • Cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d d1 to d5
  • every 21 days

9
Optimal chemotherapy
  • The cornerstone trials
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering
  • 4 EP gt 3 VAB-6
  • Equal efficacy, lesser toxicity
  • Bosl GJ, J Clin Oncol, 1988, 6 1231

10
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 1988
  • 4 cycles
  • Etoposide 100 mg/m2/d d1 to d5
  • Cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d d1 to d5
  • every 21 days

11
Optimizing chemotherapy
  • Reducing toxicity
  • 4 ? number of cycles
  • B90 ? doses (delete ?)
  • E500 ? doses (E360)
  • P Carboplatin

12
Cisplatin or carboplatin ?
  • Cisplatin without any doubt ?
  • MSKCC
  • 4 E500P vs 4 E500C (500 mg/m2)
  • N 270 patients (S NS)
  • Better DFS with cisplatin
  • Bajorin D, J Clin Oncol, 1993, 11 598

13
Cisplatin or carboplatin ?
  • Cisplatin without any doubt ?
  • MRC/EORTC
  • 4 B30E360P vs 4 B30E360C (AUC5)
  • N 598 patients (NS)
  • Better DFS and OS with cisplatin
  • Horwich A, J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15 1844

14
Cisplatin or carboplatin ?
  • Cisplatin without any doubt !
  • German group
  • 3 B90E500P vs 4 B90E360C (AUC5)
  • N 54 patients (NS)
  • Higher rate of events with carboplatin
  • Bokemeyer A, Ann Oncol, 1996, 7 1015

15
Take home messages
  • Number 1
  • Do not use carboplatin !

16
3 or 4 cycles ?
  • 3 cycles with B90E500P
  • Indiana University
  • 4 B90E500P 3 B90E500P
  • N 118 patients (SNS)
  • Similar DFS and OS
  • Saxman SB, J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16 702

17
3 or 4 cycles ?
  • 3 cycles with B90E500P
  • EORTC/MRC
  • 3 B90E500P 1 E500P 3 B90E500P
  • N 812 patients (SNS)
  • Similar 2-year DFS (90.4 vs 89.4)
  • de Wit R, J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19 1629

18
Take home messages
  • Number 2
  • 3 cycles of BEP are enough
  • when optimal doses of bleomycin
  • and etoposide are used

19
Can we delete bleomycin ?
  • No ! with 3 cycles of E500P
  • Indiana University
  • 3 B90E500P gt 3 E500P
  • N 171 patients (SNS)
  • Better DFS and OS with bleomycin
  • Loehrer PJ, J Clin Oncol, 1995, 13 470

20
Can we delete bleomycin ?
  • No ! with 4 cycles of E360P
  • EORTC
  • 4 B90E360P gt 4 E360P
  • N 395 patients (NS)
  • Better DFS (95vs 87)
  • de Wit, J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15 1837

21
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 2000
  • 3 B90E500P or
  • 4 E500P or
  • 4 B90E360P
  • Is there a role for 4 B30E360P ?

22
US BEP
  • Results
  • 3 B90E500P 4 B30E360P
  • Nb patients 83 83
  • Responses () 88 87
  • GCT deaths 1 9
  • p0.008
  • Toner GC, Lancet, 2001, 357 739

23
Optimal chemotherapy
  • Final question
  • 3 B90E500P
  • or
  • 4 E500P ?
  • French (GETUG) trial

24
GETUG T93BP
  • Results
  • 3 B90E500P 4 E500P
  • NS patients 124 122
  • Responses () 95 97
  • GCT deaths 5 12
  • p0.096
  • Culine S, Ann Oncol, 2007, 18 917

25
Take home messages
  • Number 3
  • 3 B90E500P is the gold standard in good-risk
    patients
  • (4 E500P in case of contraindication for
    bleomycin)

26
Optimal chemotherapy
  • Pure seminoma
  • Is 4 E500P
  • an appropriate option ?

27
Pure seminoma
  • Probably yes
  • MRC
  • 4 E500P gt 4 Carboplatin
  • N 130 patients
  • PFS 84 and OS 89 with EP
  • Horwich A, Br J Cancer, 2000, 83 1623

28
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 2008 Seminoma
  • 4 E500P
  • or
  • 3 B90E500P

29
CHEMOTHERAPY FORADVANCED TESTICULAR GERM-CELL
TUMORS
  • INTERMEDIATE-RISK
  • DISEASE

30
Non seminoma
  • IGCCCG classification
  • Absence of non-pulmonary
  • visceral metastasis and
  • 1000 lt AFP lt 10,000 ng/ml or
  • 5000 lt hCG lt 50,000 UI/ml or
  • 1,5 N lt LDH lt 10 N
  • IGCCCG, J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15 594

31
Seminoma
  • IGCCCG classification
  • Non pulmonary
  • visceral metastasis
  • IGCCCG, J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15 594

32
Prognosis
  • IGCCCG classification
  • Non seminoma Seminoma
  • 28 of cases 10 of cases
  • 5-year survival 5-year survival
  • 80 72

33
Take home messages
  • Number 4
  • 4 B90E500P is the gold standard
  • in intermediate-risk patients
  • Why ? Nothing better !

34
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 2008
  • Limited number of trials
  • Mixed with poor-risk patients
  • VIP BEP (EORTC)

35
Optimal chemotherapy
  • 2008 Ongoing trials
  • EORTC
  • 4 B90E500P versus 4 T B90E500P
  • GETUG
  • VIP in seminoma
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com