Title: Transformational Power of Internet: Business development strategies
1Transformational Power of InternetBusiness
development strategies
- NCHELP Leadership Conference
- January 2006
- George T. Geis
- geis_at_ucla.edu
2Session outline
- Background alliances/corporate investments for
business development - AOL/Time Warner a digital strategy that
plummeted - The music market dynamic industry structure
business development - Apple iTunes/iPod a digital strategy that soared
- Implications and takeaways
3Range of alliances/investments for business
development
- Pooling technology and building new businesses
- Philips and Sony used a nonequity alliance to
pool patents and develop the compact disk. They
later licensed the product as an open standard
with Sony marketing it in Asia and Philips
pushing it in Europe and the U.S. - Using the global sliver effect pursuing a
product or value-chain sliver on a world-wide
basis - Starbucks leveraging a product/concept through a
galaxy of alliances
4Starbucks global sliver
- Product line extensions/co-branding
- Pepsi (bottled coffee beverages)
- Dreyers (premium coffee ice cream)
- Geographical expansion
- Joint venture with Sazaby (Japan)
- Chapters in-store stores (Canada)
- SC de Mexico (Latin America)
- Channels
- ITT Sheraton (coffee served throughout hotel)
- United Airlines (in-flight coffee)
- UCLA (coffee served in executive program)
- Formats and forums
- Barnes Noble (in-store stores)
- Host Marriott Services (airport kiosk)
Adapted from David Ernst, Strategic Alliances
Conference, London, 1998.
5Range of alliances/investments for business
development (cont)
- Accessing skills
- 25 years ago Samsung was off the map. Today, the
company is a leading player in TV monitors, VCRs,
and a wide range of consumer electronics. Of 100
businesses theyve started, at least ¼ have been
started via a JV. In many other cases, licensing
deals enabled them to access critical skill
capability
6Internet Transformation
- Products services in all markets are combining
with digital technology and communications to
create new offerings - Digital technologies are disrupting markets and
organizations - Disruption will flow and ebb -- driven by the
ongoing march of broadband/wireless/digital media
tempered by swinging moods of reward and loss
7Business development triangle
Product/ Service
Impacts
- Competitive positioning
- Business development partnering
Technology
Platform
8Analyzing the AOL/Time Warner Merger
- Worst business combination of all time?
9Entertainment industry challenging MA
environment
1. Industry/company characteristics
- Entertainment industry acquisitions problematic
in 1980s and 1990s - Universal shuffled from Matsushita ? Seagrams ?
Vivendi - Uncertain returns
- Advertising fluctuation during economic cycle
- High risk in creative/movie projects
10Pre-merger context of AOL (1999)
1. Industry/company characteristics
- AOL reaches record market capitalization (over
200 billion) - Large subscriber base (largely dial-up)
- Vigorous ad/commerce deals
- First USA credit card partnership
- Many deals with dot-com firms flush with venture
capital money (see Bear Stearns backlog table) - Stock market places premium on Internet firms
11AOLs virtuous cycle for commerce deals in 90s
1. Industry/company characteristics
Build subscriber base
- Gain subscribers by attracting partners
customers - Add subscribers through brick mortar deals
- Mobile access
- Interactive TV
- International expansion
- Content deals
- Local services (such as MovieFone)
AOL
Monetize subscriber base
Enhance services content
- Advertising and commerce deals
12Trouble brewing on AOLs horizon
1. Industry/company characteristics
- New ISPs providing service with low or no monthly
fees - Increasing popularity of broadband
- Cable and phone companies offering their own ISP
systems - Would customers pay a premium for AOL on top of
an already expensive broadband connection?
13AOLs strategic challenges
II. Merger motivations
- Users becoming more Internet savvy, so appeal of
AOLs gated community diminishing - Rapid growth of broadband
- Loss of dial-up subscribers
- Subscription revenue as well as adcom revenue
threatened - Need for compelling content
14Appeal of Time Warner as a target
II. Merger motivations
- Time Warner one of the largest media firms
- Publishing properties
- included Time, People magazines
- 25 of ad revenue among U.S. magazines
- Warner Music group
- Warner Bros studios
- WB network, HBO
15Reasons for merger AOL
II. Merger motivations
- AOL/Time Warner would be first integrated
Internet-powered media/communications company - Complementary assets would stimulate growth of
subscription and ad/commerce revenue - AOL would drive digital transformation of TWXs
divisions - AOL estimated 1 billion of EDITDA synergies in
first year of operation
16Reasons for merger TWX
II. Merger motivations
- TWX traditional properties would be brought into
the new media age - AOLs Internet infrastructure would provide new
distribution outlet - TWXs broadband systems would provide platform
for AOLs interactive services
17Epilog From riches to rags
III. Merger performance
- AOLs model of monetizing adcom partnerships
worked amazingly well in the 1990s - AOLs structuring of adcom deals (such as First
USA) included 1) upfront cash 2) success fee on
initial deliverable 3) percentage fee for
ongoing usage. - In April 2002, AOL Time Warner reported a loss of
54.2 billion after taking the largest charge in
corporate history (related to the Time Warner
acquisition). - What had been a very successful business
development strategy in the 1990s needed a
makeover. - AOL Time Warner struggled as a merged company to
manage conflicts with broadband and content
partner companies. - In October 2003, the AOL became silent in AOL
Time Warner as the companys name became Time
Warner - In 2005, investors were pressuring Time Warner to
spin off its cable unit and repurchase 20B TWX
shares as a value play.
18AOL/TWX deal notoriety
III. Merger performance
- In months following acquisition, almost 200B in
market value evaporated - CEOs and other senior executives from both
companies resigned or were fired - Government investigations were triggered by
alleged accounting violations
19YHOO performance better than TWX
III. Merger performance
Note that for the first year after the merger,
AOL Time Warner roughly tracked the SP 500
index thereafter the shares slumped sharply and
aligned more closely to the Internet index.
20Analyzing Apple iTunes/iPod
- "Hello iPod, Goodbye Walkman"
21Recorded music business
- In recent years, worldwide sales of recorded
music has ranged between 30 and 40 billion. - Some 35 of sales (12 billion) in the US
8 decrease in 2002
4 decrease in 2001
6 decrease in 2003
2 increase in 2004
Source RIAA
22Big 5(4) have accounted for 80 of record
company market share in U.S.
Source Billboard, SoundScan
23Traditional music recording value chain
Content Generation (AR)
Production
Manu- facturing
Distribution
Retail
Marketing
Major record companies vertically integrated
24Linear value chain is being upset and replaced
New media distributor
Internet retailer
Hybrid music activities
Traditional music activities
Management Company
Record Label
Manufacturing
Marketing
Distribution
Retailer
Consumer
Digital Delivery
Digital music activities
25What a difference an iPod makes
26Key market modeling questions
- Which value activities are market choke points?
- With whom should I partner in building a superior
business model?
27Visualizing Apples business development strategy
28Lessons from the digital music market
- Digital technology impacts market from multiple
perspectives - industry structure and power shifting (artists,
new players, large incumbents, consumers) - technology standards battle
- changes in product form
- business model morphing
29Takeaways
- You must consider a large number of options in
constructing a company's business development DNA - The success of Apple's business development model
involved selecting which value activities to
control or influence
30Value created and divided in new ways
Think of an industry as a picture puzzle with
each piece representing a part of the chain of
suppliers, manufacturers, and service providers
that currently make up its structure. On the back
of each piece is a number representing its
value. Now take the puzzle apart and change the
shape of the piecescut them in half, attach them
to others, discard a few, and create new ones.
Then assign new values to each piece, but use a
much broader and higher range of
numbers. Winning will be about shaping or owning
the right pieces at the right time and putting
them together in new ways.
Lowell Bryan, Jane Fraser, Jeremy Oppenheim, and
Wilhelm Rall, Race for the World