Unit III: Class, Race and Gender - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Unit III: Class, Race and Gender

Description:

Poverty line and minimum wage. The federal poverty line is calculated as a measure of subsistence by taking ... who makes the minimum wage, will usually fall ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:921
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Peter9
Category:
Tags: iii | class | federal | gender | minimum | race | unit | wage

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unit III: Class, Race and Gender


1
Unit III Class, Race and Gender
  • Inequality as the backbone of social structure
    10/24

2
Inequality and Functions or Dysfunctions
  • Functionalists tend to view inequality as a
    central element of social control, rewards,
    incentives, and opportunities,
  • as a thermostat.
  • Conflict theorists tend to view inequality as a
    game of Monopoly and inherited privilege,
  • as a vicious cycle or a cancer.

3
Insight of functional theory
  • Inequality represents a system of rewards,
    incentives and controls.
  • To the degree that the inequality serves crucial
    social functions, reducing it might be killing
    the goose that lays the golden eggs.
  • For example it could reward people for doing
    important work,
  • or it might motivate people to gain training,
  • or it might reflect differences in peoples
    abilities or priorities

4
Insight of conflict theory
  • Wealth and poverty can feed on themselves as a
    vicious cycle.
  • To the extent that inequality becomes divisive,
    dysfunctional or cancerous, we need to limit it.
  • Many societies in the past have failed because
    they had to devote more and more resources to
    coercion and social control,
  • because they were divided by conflicts over
    inequality
  • and poverty is wasteful and dangerous.

5
The functional model of stratification
  • The functional model was dominant in the
    mid-twentieth century.
  • It argued that inequality is functionally
    necessary to motivate training and attract talent
    to important positions,
  • and that therefore all societies are stratified,
  • and reduction of stratification would make
    everyone worse off.

6
Murrays functionalism
  • Charles Murray argues
  • A defense of income differences It is justified
    to pay the high IQ businessman more than the
    low-IQ ditch digger because that is the only way
    to make the economy grow and produce wealth in
    which the ditch digger can share. It is a matter
    of economic pragmatism and it is also right.
    After the experience of the 20th c. it is hard to
    imagine that anyone could disagree. (The Bell
    Curve pp 527-8)
  • This is the view that was dominent in sociology
    in the 1950s but is not accepted today.

7
Inequality as a thermostat
  • A thermostat is designed to maintain heat
  • Functionalists see inequality as functioning to
    maintain incentives and rewards


(lack of) heat
furnace
-

(lack of) incentives and rewards
Control structures generating inequality
-
8
Formalization by Davis Moore
  • Not all jobs are equally important.
  • Not all people are equally able or motivated.
  • Training takes time and money.
  • Stratification is an unconsciously evolved device
    to motivate the most able people to acquire the
    training and to diligently fill the most
    important positions.
  • Therefore, all societies must be stratified.

9
Strengths of the functional model
  • All developed societies are stratified.
  • Increased pay is a strong motivator,
  • Especially in a society where ones childrens
    life chances depend, importantly, on ones
    income.
  • Some forms and ranges of inequality are widely
    believed to be functional.

10
Weaknesses of the model
  • It does not account for property income, and
    appears to be inconsistent with it.
  • It does not account for ascriptive (race, gender)
    differences in income.
  • Many functionally indispensable jobs (public
    health worker, teacher) are paid less than many
    jobs that appear more dispensable (advertising).
  • It does not specify any level of inequality.
  • It ignores dysfunctions.

11
The point of Spaceship Earth
  • We referred to a thought-experiment during the
    last week before the break,
  • suggested by Feagins discussion of the analysis
    by Hawken.
  • In each column, decide the range of inequality
    between elite and the lower ¼ that you think
    would be most functional,
  • and cross out any range that you think would be
    nonviable and non-sustainable.
  • This implies that inequality is not like kindness.

12
Gans ironic functional theory
  • Gans (p.363,368) argued that the poor clean
    toilets and give work to social workers, bookies
    and police.
  • But Gans point is that you can always find
    functions of any condition.
  • That does not show whether we would be better off
    if inequality was greater, or less than it is.

13
The conflict model of stratification
  • We have seen that the core of conflict theory is
    that possession of resources tends to increase
    access to further resources, as in Monopoly


Properties (wealth)
Rents (income)

14
Reasons that an excess of inequality might be
dysfunctional
  • Inequality plausibly feeds all social problems
  • Academic failure,
  • Crime, juvenile delinquency, drug use, gangs,
  • Conflict and a police state
  • Family breakdown,
  • Anomie,
  • ill health
  • Could a free and well-functioning spaceship have
    an income ratio of more than 1,000 1 ? Conflict
    theorists say No

15
Can the rules of Monopoly be changed?
  • Different rules will lead to different outcomes.
    The usual rules accentuate positive feedback and
    produce absolute polarization in a few hours.
  • What are some rule changes that would prevent or
    slow polarization?
  • What are some rule changes that would speed it up?

16
Is it possible to limit inequality?
  • It is a presumption of the sociological
    imagination that people create society, just as
    society creates people.
  • Different societies restrict different kinds of
    inequality in many ways, some direct (taxation,
    regulation),some indirect (unions, markets), some
    mixed (insurance arrangements.)


individuals
Social structures

17
Can one combine functional and conflict theories?
  • There are many possible combinations,
  • focusing on different kinds of inequalities and
    different processes.
  • But a great deal of ones analysis depends on
    whether one believes that the most important and
    the most powerful processes are
  • A) the thermostats (functionalists)
  • B) the Vicious cycles (conflict theorists)

18
Myrdal model revisted
  • For example, we have seen that Myrdal pictured
    the dynamic of race relations as a
    self-reinforcing structure of inequality and
    racism restrained by the normative system of the
    American Creed

violates

Racial inequality
American Creed
Racism

- generates reforms
19
How much inequality is there?
  • There are many kinds of inequality, and income
    inequality is not the largest.
  • Like most social inequalities, income is
    distributed very differently from variables such
    as height, strength, speed or ability, which are
    distributed normally.
  • There are several hundred billionaires in the US,
    each with property incomes more than 10,000 times
    as large as the poverty line.

20
Poverty line and minimum wage
  • The federal poverty line is calculated as a
    measure of subsistence by taking the cost of
    the amount of food required to avoid
    malnutrition, and multiplying by 3 (because
    people spend about 1/3 of their income on food).
  • A 4-person family with one earner who makes the
    minimum wage, will usually fall below the poverty
    line.

21
Calculation of the poverty line
  • 14,000 for everyone for everything per yr.
  • 3,666 per person for everything per year.
  • 1,222 per person for food per year.
  • 3.35 per person for food per day.
  • 1.12 per meal.
  • 6/hr.x40hrs./wk. x50wk/yr. 12,000 gross

22
Who is poor? The old vs. the young. Why?
23
How and why has inequality increased?
  • Each of these shifts involve tens of millions of
    people, and they are complex.
  • Some of the social forces and social policies
    driving them are highly indirect e.g. changes in
    the world economy, GATT, unionization, etc.
  • But the main trends in the poverty rate of the
    old and the young are driven by policy.
  • As a country, we decided to lower the poverty
    rate of the elderly, and we did so.
  • We reduced efforts to lower the poverty rate of
    the young, especially welfare.
  • Charles Murrays analyses were central to this
    choice.

24
Rise and fall of the functional model of
stratification.
  • Today, most sociologists believe that the
    dynamics of inequality are more a matter of
    power, influence and organization than of
    functional needs.
  • What is the optimal level of income inequality?
  • Sociologists disagree (social science cannot
    say),
  • but most believe a lot less than the 110,000
    that exists in the US today,
  • which has a lot of dysfunctional consequences.

25
The forced division of labor revisited
  • Durkhiems analysis of organic solidarity
    requires that there be an open and fair
    competition for higher positions.
  • Durkheim believed that inherited inequalities
    create a forced division of labor.
  • Durkheimian functionalism can generate liberal or
    radical positions depending whether reforms or
    even structural changes are viewed as necessary
    to generate organic solidarity.

26
Why equality of opportunity implies inequality
  • Opportunity is usually understood as the
    opportunity to make something of ones life I.e.
    to become unequal.
  • (There is no equality of opportunity if everyone
    gets the same result no matter what they do.)
  • Therefore equality of opportunity implies
    inequality.

27
Paradoxes of equality of opportunity
  • One of the reasons that the high proportion of
    children growing up in poverty is troubling to
    most people is that it appears to conflict with
    equality of opportunity.
  • Most Americans defend that ideal ,
  • but it has a paradoxical relation to inequality
  • Equality of opportunity implies inequality
  • Inequality implies inequality of opportunity.

28
Why inequality implies inequality of opportunity
  • However, if parents have grossly unequal
    resources, they give their children unequal
    opportunities.
  • By any conception of equality of opportunity, it
    is hard to believe that it exists between those
    growing up malnourished and those growing up in
    affluence.
  • Thus inequality produces inequality of
    opportunity.
  • And this extends to school, health, legal
    defense, and all other areas of social life.

29
Possible resolutions of the paradox
  • From Durkheim to current theory, there are many
    different kinds of resolution of the paradoxes.
  • Most people believe that inequalities are
    permissible, but only if they are not too large.
  • And most people believe that access to health
    care and education should be buffered against
    market inequalities.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com