J9 United States Joint Forces Command

1
J9 United States Joint Forces Command

• Innovation and Experimentation Enterprise (IEE)

Business Plan Vision
Bud Hay Experimentation Group Director Joint
Innovation and Experimentation USJFCOM, J9
Approved for Public Release
2
What Is Experimentation?

• Competition of ideas in a robust analytical
  environment to develop and assess alternatives in
  order to provide recommendations for DOTMLPF
  improvements.

• Rapid Response
• Adapt to changes in the current operating
  environment
• Understand the changes within days
• Model changes within weeks
• Compete alternative solutions
• Field solution/s within months

• Capability Development
• Anticipate changes to the future operating
  environment
• Understand the range of potential change
• Model comprehensively
• Compete alternative solutions
• Guide Department investments to field solutions
  over time

3
Joint Concept Development and Experimentation
Enterprise Mission (Draft)
Support todays joint warfighter and shape the
future joint force by

• coordinating Department of Defense Concept
  Development and Experimentation efforts and
  developing, exploring and assessing new joint
  concepts, organizational structures and emerging
  technologies through a process of discovery,
  innovation, adaptation and integration to drive
  transformation changes to achieve the optimal
  future Joint force capability.

Governing Directives Unified Command Plan 2004
2006 Being functionally responsible to the
Chairman for leading joint concept development
and experimentation (CDE)Developing combined
operational warfighting concepts and integrating
multinational and interagency warfighting
transformation efforts with joint CDE in
coordination with other combatant
commands. SECDEF Transformation Planning
Guidance (TPG) Commander, JFCOM, is responsible
for coordinating concept development and
experimentation efforts of the Combatant
Commands. Commander, JFCOM will report
annually to the Secretary of Defense on progress
in experimentation areas and on the adequacy of
dedicated experimentation infrastructures. In
particular, the report should address and make
recommendations onWar Gaming, MS a new
generation is needed CJCS Joint Experimentation
Guidance for FY06-07 JFCOM works directly with
the Services, combatant commands, the defense
agencies, interagency and multinational partners,
and the Joint Staff to develop a cohesive plan to
synchronize and, when appropriate, integrate
experimentation activities
4
The Challenge of Adapting to a Dynamic
Warfighting Environment
Must Transform MS to Support Reorientation of
the Force
5
The Challenge of Multiple Domains within the
Warfighting Environment
Strategic
Military
Multinational
Interagency
Operational
Tactical
6
Innovation and Experimentation Enterprise MS
Vision (710 Years)

• Establish a standing, globally distributed,
  synthetic environment
• Capable of continuously supporting live, virtual,
  and constructive experimentation across the
  Innovation and Experimentation Enterprise
• Allowing us to both rapidly adapt to changes
  within todays battlespace while anticipating
  those of tomorrows
• Position us to offer effective solutions, both
  kinetic and non-kinetic, to the complex
  challenges being faced by our Warfighters across
  the spectrum of operations
• By ensuring that this synthetic environment is
  interactive with the other modeling and
  simulation domains (training, planning,
  acquisition, testing, and analysis) it will allow
  us to significantly reduce risk to the Force and
• Save lives
• Save time
• Save funding

7
Innovation Experimentation Customers and
Partners
Technical idea implementers
International, Inter-Agency, State Local
Govt, Extra-Govt
Innovation Experimentation Environment
Concept idea factories
Technical idea factories
8
Systems View The Core in 7-10 Years
9
Systems View The Next Decade (7-10 Years)

• Unified Action focused, collaborative
• Reach-back, reach-over, reach forward
• Service-oriented architectures
• Standing peer-to-peer enterprises
• Common, accessible, authoritative data
• User-initiated culture
• Inclusive, adaptive security
• Rapid environment generation
• High performance computing
• Multi-resolution environments

Constructive Campaign Analysis
HITL Virtual Visualization
Live Operations
Operational Process
PMESII
10
Enterprise Element The Services
11
Enterprise Element The COCOMS
Supply Chain Modeling
Challenges
SEAS, GAPS
JSAF, G2

• Common challenges and
• Disparate environments
• Mission diversity
• Immediacy
• Security firewalls
• Lean resources
• Operational focus

JSAF
SEAS, JSAF
SEAS, GAPS
JSAF, G2
SEAS
12
Enterprise Element The Multinationals
JSAF
ALLIANCE
JOANNA
SEAS
SEAS
JSAF
JSAF
RAHS
JSAF
13
Enterprise Element The Extended Community
State Local Governments
JSAF, G2
JSAF
Challenges
JAS, JSAF

• Common challenges and
• Proprietary concerns
• Technologically inconsistent
• Security
• Widely divergent interests, cultures, focus,
  processes
• Dissimilar resourcing
• External to DoD

SEAS, G2
Others
14
Immediate IEE MS Capability Gaps (FY08 09)

• PMESII - Engaging the Extended Community
  (Inter-Agency, State Local Government,
  Multinational, etc.)
• Transformational Data Management
• Rapid Problem Set Characterization
• Collaborative Distributed Environment
• Integrated Chemical, Biological, Radiological,
  High Explosive (CBRNE) Characterization
• Joint Urban Operations
• Leveraging Commercial Gaming to Support DoD
• Predictive Battlespace Awareness
• Industry Sharing Protocols
• Network Capacity / Access
• Non-kinetic Algorithms
• Human Behavior
• Embedding MS in Operational Systems
• Flexible Scalability
• Enhancement / Retirement Criteria for Legacy
  Systems

15
From Evolution to Transformation of MS

• Challenges
• Multilayer security
• Data sharing
• Cultures
• Disparate national objectives
• Understanding
• Infrastructure
• National proprietary concerns

• 2014 - 2017
• A standing, globally distributed, synthetic
  environment
• Unified Action focused, collaborative
• Reach-back, reach-over, reach forward
• Service-oriented architectures
• Standing peer-to-peer enterprises
• Common, accessible, authoritative data
• User-initiated culture
• Inclusive, adaptive security
• Rapid environment generation
• High performance computing
• Multi-resolution environments

• Challenges
• Data Transparency
• Disparate Networks
• Cultural Insularity
• Intermittency
• Disparate Modeling
• Resourcing
• (time, funds, expertise)
• Title 10 focused

• Challenges
• Disparate environments
• Mission diversity
• Immediacy
• Security firewalls
• Lean resources
• Operational focus

• Challenges
• Widely divergent interests, cultures, focus,
  processes
• Different Timelines
• Varying levels of maturity
• Dissimilar priorities
• No common vision
• Lack of mutual recognition

• Challenges
• Proprietary concerns
• Technologically inconsistent
• Dissimilar resourcing
• External to DoD

Gaps 2007
16
Fight the Joint Fight
Adapt

• Total Force MS Capabilities. The MS
  capabilities required to support the
  organizations, units, and individuals that
  comprise the Department of Defense's resources
  for implementing the National Security Strategy.

Top priority for development of MS capabilities
should go to meeting the needs of those elements
of the Total Force whose missions place them at
the tip of the spear the Warfighters.
Anticipate
Organize Train Equip
Total Force MS Capabilities
EXPERIMENT ANALYZE TEST
ACQUIRE TRAIN
PLAN
17
Backup
18
International Security Assistance Force X

• JFCOM supporting ISAF-X with deployment and use
  of
• Synthetic Environment for Analysis and Simulation
  (SEAS)
• Operational Net Assessment (ONA) Tool
• SEAS
• Incorporates Political, Military, Economic,
  Social, Information, and Infrastructure (PmESII)
  interactions
• Uses 5 Fundamental Elements of Society
• Integrates Non-State Actors
• Demonstrates media and propagandas influence on
  public opinion overseas
• Illustrates prevailing local attitude towards
  multiple Red, Blue, and Green forces
• ONA
• Systematic development of Effects to Nodes to
  Actions to Resources linkages.
• Supports an Effects Based Approach to Operations.
• Structured around a PmESII analysis of the
  adversary, the environment, the neutral and
  friendly situation.

19
Noble Resolve 07-I Technical Architecture
Maritime Domain Awareness
Real Data
VignettesDefense in Depth
Real Data (ships in MSSIS)
Maritime Real Data
Synthetic World (JSAF)
NR 2
UnifiedQuest
10/18-1
20
Noble Resolve 07-2 Simulation Federation
J9 (Suffolk)
JTF-HD (Hawaii)
FBI
GUAM
TV32/AIS
J9/MDA GATEWAY
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
PACOM
JTF-CS (Ft. Monroe)
MDA
SLAMEM
ARNORTH (San Antonio, TX)
SLAMEM
PALANTERRA
SLAMEM
PALANTERRA
G2
PALANTERRA
NORTHCOM (Colorado)
CD-CIE
CANADA
JAS
USCG/MIFC
NMIC-V
CBP-C
CBP-P
NICC-I
PORTLAND
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
MDA Structure Available both Class Unclass
JVLCDT
TIES
TEC (Ft. Belvoir)
J9/MDA GATEWAY
CCD16
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
DTRA (Ft. Belvoir)
STEALTH
STEALTH
ORNG
STEALTH
PALANTERRA
PALANTERRA
TIME Svr
SPAWAR (San Diego)
SSP
CofVA (Richmond)
MDA
PALANTERRA
mosBe
PALANTERRA
IWMDT
CultureSim
IIMG
USCG/MIFC
CBP-P
NICC-I
NMIC-V
CBP-C
Multi-Natl. Partners
PALANTERRA
CBSIM
SPP
ARC
RDAC
PALANTERRA
JVLC
HPAC
PALANTERRA
WAN to SITE CONNECTION
FAARS
MARCI
21
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1
1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1
19
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1
International Representation in Joint
Experimentation
15
1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1
1 1 2 1 3 1
14
13
950 increase in nations over 7 years and growing
8
6
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2001 2002 2003 2004
2005 2006 2007
2007 Projected
22
Technical View Today . . .
EXPERIMENTATION / TRAINING
JNTC
JSAF
JCATS
JTLS
GAPS
JSAF
JAS
G2
JDLM
AWSIM
SEAS
TACSIM
A Joint Exemplar
23
Technical View Today . . .

• Transition from where we are today to where we
  want to be tomorrow . . .

EXPERIMENTATION / TRAINING

• Our Path Ahead
• Establish a synthetic environment that can enable
  us to maintain the initiative in operational
  innovation by being able to
• Model any situation within days
• Compete alternative solutions within weeks
• Within months, provide both
• - validated solutions to the Warfighters in
  the field
• - validated requirements to feed the
  longer-term capabilities development process

JNTC
JSAF
JCATS
JTLS
GAPS
JSAF
JAS
G2
JDLM
AWSIM
SEAS
TACSIM
A Joint Exemplar