Dominican Republic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dominican Republic

Description:

Dominican Republic. Development of an Integrated System of ... olga.luciano_at_verizon.net.do. The Netherlands, May 2006. Cuba. Florida. Haiti. South America ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: OlgaLuci
Learn more at: https://unstats.un.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dominican Republic


1
Dominican Republic
  • Development of an Integrated System of Water
    Accounts as an Opportunity for Integrated Water
    Resources Management and Water Governance
  • Presented by Olga LUCIANO-LÓPEZ
  • olga.luciano_at_verizon.net.do
  • The Netherlands, May 2006.

2
Florida
Cuba
Haiti
South America
3
Context
  • Water legislation in the Dominican Republic is
    not updated according to the guiding principles
    for water management agreed in Dublin, Rio, and
    Johannesburg between 1992 and 2002.
  • This legislation is fragmented and sector biased.
  • The institutional framework derived from the
    existing legislation is also fragmented and
    complex.

4
Context
  • Under the existing framework, different
    institutions share responsibility for
  • Policy decision-making
  • Issuing permits
  • Provision of water services (aqueducts,
    irrigation channels, dams and hydropower plants).

5
Context
  • Although some consensus has been built around
    important issues related with water management,
    attempts to pass a new water law based on IWRM
    and the separation of roles have not been
    successful.
  • The approval of the environment law and the
    creation of the Ministry of the Environment in
    2000 was a major step forward for integrating
    environment management policies.

6
Context
  • In particular the mandate to develop a national
    information system on the environment and natural
    resources, and to mainstream environment in the
    national accounting system opened the doors to
    important initiatives geared towards
    inter-institutional coordination.

7
The indicators process
  • In 2002, assisted by UN ECLAC, the Ministry of
    the Environment embarked in the process of
    developing sustainable development indicators,
    based on an inter-institutional cooperative
    approach.
  • Through training activities organized by ECLAC,
    observation visits in the region, and an
    internship in INEGI and SEMARNAT in Mexico, the
    formation of a basic core of environment
    statistitians has begun.
  • By June 2003 formal contacts had been established
    with international cooperation and important
    decissions were taken in order to
  • Prioritize indicators by benefit/cost analysis
    and for policy decission-making
  • Start with a cross-cutting issue like water
  • Use the process to encourage inter-institutional
    coordination

8
The indicators process
  • July 2004
  • With the collaboration of 15 institutions the
    Ministry of Environment published a compilation
    of 82 environment statistics, each with metadata
    and existing databases, out of a common list of
    108 suggested by the REDESA project leaded by
    ECLAC.
  • This was very instrumental in convincing other
    institutions of the seriousness of the process.

9
Stakeholders involvement
  • A workshop held in December 2004 with the support
    of ECLAC and the local GTZ representation
    resulted in the establishment of three
    inter-institutional task forces for the
    development of indicators on
  • Water availability
  • Water quality
  • Watershed management

10
Stakeholders involvement
  • Representatives from the Central Bank and the
    National Statistics Office joined the task
    forces.
  • This gave birth to the idea of moving beyond
    statistics and indicators and seek technical
    assistance for the development of a water
    accounting system.

11
Stakeholders involvement
  • At around the same time a very important task was
    assigned to the Ministry of the Environment to
    chair the national effort to comply with MDG 7
    and to develop a comprehensive proposal to
    achieve each of its targets, including target 10.
  • The progress made on statistics/indicators proved
    to be very useful to comply with this task.

12
Stakeholders involvement
  • In March 2005 a workshop facilitated by UNSD
    expert Alessandra Alfieri and two experts from
    ECLAC accelerated the process.
  • The workshop raised awareness on the complexity
    of the task, but at the same time strengthened
    the commitment of the institutions to move
    forward.

13
Stakeholders involvement
  • Under the basic idea of promoting IWRM and
    strengthen the country capacity to define
    policies and regulatory measures for water
    management, an agreement was signed by 12
    institutions in June 2005
  • to develop an integrated water monitoring and
    information system composed of statistics,
    accounts, and indicators and
  • to mainstream environment into the System of
    National Accounts, starting by a satellite water
    account.

14
Stakeholders involvement
  • The agreement involve the Ministry of the
    Environment and Natural Resources, the Central
    Bank, the National Statistics and Meteorological
    Offices, the National Institute for Hydraulic
    Resources, National Institute for Drinking Water
    and Sewage, the Dominican Corporation of State
    Electric Enterprises, and five Drinking Water and
    Sanitation Corporations.
  • They have all agreed to share the institutional
    information they posess (on the economy and on
    water) and to provide technical support to the
    process.

15
Governance issues and success factors
  • Political support at the highest level made it
    possible for the process to survive a change in
    government administration (Aug. 2004)
  • Technical leadership in the Ministry of the
    Environment, recognized by other stakeholders
  • Identification of a critical issue as water,
    which brings together multiple stakeholders at
    national and international level
  • Open and participatory nature of the process
  • Ownership of the process by the technical staff
    of different institutions
  • Intellingent use of cooperation and training
    opportunities.

16
Conclusions
  • The legislative path proved to be complicated and
    difficult stakeholders could not see clearly
    what they could gain but feared what they could
    lose.
  • The building-up of an integrated water
    information system seemed harmless for water
    management stakeholders and they were attracted
    by the involvement of a major player in high
    policy-making as the Central Bank.
  • Can water accounts become an opportunity for
    Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)?

17
THANK YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com