IRB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

IRB

Description:

... J. O., Grimm-Thomas, K., Markey, C. N., Sawyer, R., & Johnson, S. L. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: A measure of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: alisonv
Category:
Tags: irb | sawyer

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IRB


1
Goodness of Fit Between Child Temperament and
Parent Feeding Practices Predicts Weight Outcomes
in a Longitudinal Sample of Girls Stephanie L.
Anzman Leann L. Birch The Center for Childhood
Obesity Research, The Department of Human
Development and Family Studies The Pennsylvania
State University
BACKGROUND
RESULTS contd
PARTICIPANTS
  • There was a significant interaction between
    inhibitory control and restriction, such that
    girls with lower inhibitory control and higher
    restriction demonstrated more weight gain over
    time (plt.05) and the highest BMIs at study
    termination (plt.01), compared to girls with
    higher inhibitory control.
  • On average, the girls with lower inhibitory
    control and higher restriction cross into the
    overweight range over time (greater than the 85th
    percentile for age and sex, CDC Growth Charts
    see Figure 1). On average, the girls with higher
    inhibitory control remain below the 85th
    percentile at all time points.
  • Results were similar when adjusting for girls
    BMI at age 5, family income, and maternal and
    paternal education and BMI at study entry.
  • Mother-rated inhibitory control and child-rated
    restriction were not significantly correlated
    (p.58).
  • Inhibitory control is the ability to restrain a
    dominant response and execute a sub-dominant
    response.
  • This behavioral construct is an aspect of
    temperament that overlaps with impulse control,
    self-regulation, and executive function and is an
    important contributor to many aspects of healthy
    development.
  • However, little is known about its implications
    for weight outcomes in the current environment.
  • The current environment has been conceptualized
    as obesogenic, promoting excessive intake and
    sedentary behavior in many individuals.
  • Individual differences in behavioral styles could
    help to explain why some individuals become obese
    in such an environment, whereas others do not.
  • Additionally, parents restrictive feeding
    practices have been implicated in problems with
    self-regulation, particularly childrens
    overeating and overweight. Inhibitory control
    may have different implications for weight
    outcomes depending on parents levels of
    restriction.
  •  
  • 197 non-Hispanic White girls
  • Assessed at age 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15
  • 2/3 of parents reported some college education
  • Most commonly reported income category - 51,000
    to 75,000

MEASURES
  • Inhibitory control mother reported when girls
    were 7 years old, using the Child Behavior
    Questionnaire (CBQ Rothbart et al., 2001)
  • BMI calculated from measured heights and weights
    at all time points
  • BMI change scores individual slopes calculated
    from BMI at ages 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 (calculated
    only for participants with four of the five data
    points, including age 15 n167)
  • Restriction girls reports of parents
    restrictive feeding at age 7, using the Child
    Feeding Questionnaire (Birch et al., 2001)
  • Demographic covariates were measured at study
    entry (girls age 5) family income, maternal and
    paternal education level and BMI

DISCUSSION
RESULTS
  • Whereas a positive energy balance is necessary
    for growth, many children experience a positive
    energy balance that is too high, as evidenced by
    increasing rates of childhood overweight.
  • In addition to predicting social, intellectual,
    and moral development, this study showed that
    inhibitory control predicted weight outcomes.
  • The combination of lower inhibitory control and
    high parental restriction predicted the least
    healthy weight outcomes over time. Overtly
    restrictive practices are not a good fit for
    children who already struggle with inhibitory
    control.
  • These results cannot demonstrate causality,
    although the findings related to change and
    adjustment for age 5 BMI suggest that inhibitory
    control temporally preceded weight outcomes.
  • Goodness of fit between temperament and parenting
    practices could attenuate the risk of obesity in
    the current environment.
  • Potential avenues for intervention include shifts
    from overt to covert restriction in feeding
    (i.e., focus on the availability of healthy foods
    from which children can choose), especially in
    cases where children are low on inhibitory
    control.

a
ab
b
b
OBJECTIVES
  • To investigate whether girls inhibitory control
    levels predicted weight outcomes, including
  • concurrent weight status
  • weight change from age 7 to 15
  • subsequent weight status
  • To examine whether girls reports of parental
    restrictive feeding at age 7 moderated the
    relation between inhibitory control and weight
    outcomes (i.e., a goodness of fit hypothesis).

Figure 1. Average BMI change by inhibitory
control and restriction groups, with
corresponding BMI percentiles. Overall
differences in the four groups age 15 BMI
(F(148,3)4.83, plt.01) and average BMI change
scores (F(145,3)3.42, plt.05) were demonstrated.
Different subscripts to the right of the lines
indicate statistically significant differences
between groups on BMI change and age 15 BMI.
Birch, L. L., Fisher, J. O., Grimm-Thomas, K.,
Markey, C. N., Sawyer, R., Johnson, S. L.
(2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child
Feeding Questionnaire A measure of parental
attitudes, beliefs and practices about child
feeding and obesity proneness. Appetite, 36,
201-210. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey,
K., Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of
temperament at three to seven years The
Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child
Development, 72, 1394-1408.
1Inhibitory control and restriction were
continuous variables (range 1-7 1-3) but were
split at the middle of their response scales to
create categories that would facilitate
interpretation (low IC / low res n15 low IC /
high res n21 high IC / low res n69 high IC /
high res restriction n62). Results were similar
when using the continuous and categorical
variables in analyses. When using continuous
variables, predictors were centered to avoid
Heywood cases.
IRB 18342 Supported by NIH grants HD32973
M01 RR10732
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com