Title: ART AND FORM
1ART AND FORM
Bathers by a River, Henri Matisse, 1916-1917
2CLIVE BELL (1881-1964) ON ART AND EMOTION
- For Bell, aesthetics must begin with a persons
experience of a distinctive kind of emotion. - The objects which produce this kind of emotion
are called artworks. - Bell does not mean that all artworks produce the
same particular emotion, but that they produce
the same kind of emotion.
3BELL ON AESTHETIC EMOTION
- All works of visual art produce a certain kind of
emotion which Bell calls aesthetic emotion. - The question is what is the distinctive quality
which is common to all artworks which provoke
aesthetic emotion? - For Bell, there must be such a common quality or
when we speak of works of art we gibber. (This
talk of a common quality which good artworks
share recalls Plato.)
4SIGNIFICANT FORM I
- Bell There must be some one quality without
which a work of art cannot exist, and an object
cannot be an artwork unless it has this quality. - This quality Bell calls significant form, and,
according to Bell, significant form is the one
quality common to all works of visual art. - significant form df. relations and
combinations of lines and colors.
5CRITICISM AND THE SUBJECTIVE BASIS OF AESTHETICS
- Bell I have no right to consider anything a
work of art to which I cannot react emotionally. - A critic can help me to react emotionally to
something to which I have not so reacted before.
However, a critic cannot just tell me that
something is a work of art, rather, he or she
must make me feel that it is a work of art. (Note
the similarity here of Bells view to that of
Collingwood and Malevich regarding the importance
of feeling in art.) - This a critic can only do by making me see he
must get at my emotions through my eyes.
6SUBJECTIVITY AND GENERAL VALIDITY
- Bell All systems of aesthetics must be based on
personal experience - that is to say, they must
be subjective. - However, Bell says that it would be rash to
assert that no theory of aesthetics can have
general validity. - Thus, even though people can and will disagree on
which works are moving, Bell thinks they should
agree that what moving artworks have in common is
significant form. (Note how this and the previous
remark about general validity call Hume to
mind.)
7SIGNIFICANT FORM II
- Significant form consists of combinations of
lines and colors which produce aesthetic emotion.
- Bell There is no defensible distinction between
color and form you cannot conceive a colorless
line or space neither can you conceive a
formless relation of colors. And you cannot
imagine a boundary line without any content, or a
content without a boundary line.
8PAUL CÉZANNE (1839-1906)
Still Life with Basket of Apples, Paul Cézanne,
1890-1894
Still Life with Apples, Paul Cézanne, 1890-1894
9PAUL CÉZANNE (1839-1906)
Le Monte Sainte-Victoire Paul Cézanne, 1902-1904
Le Monte Sainte-Victoire Seen from Les Lauves,
Paul Cézanne, 1902-1904
Le Monte Sainte-Victoire vu des Lauves, Paul
Cézanne, 1902-1904
10DESCRIPTIVE PAINTING
- A painting is descriptive, for Bell, when its
forms are used not as objects of emotion, but as
means of suggesting emotion (such as fear) or
conveying information. - Descriptive paintings do not move us
aesthetically, and so are not works of art. - Only those objects which have significant form
move us aesthetically, and hence only these
qualify as works of art.
11EDVARD MUNCH (1863-1944)
Munchs painting The Scream would seem to fit
Bells definition of descriptive painting since
it suggests anxiety or despair. However, does
it not nevertheless have significant form? It
does if we experience aesthetic emotion in
viewing the picture, aesthetic emotion which
would be due to the successful arrangement and
interrelation of color and form. Does it not
seem that a descriptive painting can have
significant form at the same time that it
suggests a common emotion such as despair?
The Scream Edvard Munch, 1893
12FORM, COLOR, SPACE, AND ART APPRECIATION
- For Bell, to appreciate a work of art we need
only have a sense of form and color and a
knowledge of three-dimensional space. - However, three-dimensional space is not relevant
to the appreciation of all artworks, only those
that attempt to represent that space.
13The Turning Road, Lestaque, Andre Derain
(1880-1954), 1906
No. 14, 1960, Mark Rothko (1903-1970), 1960
The representation of three-dimensional space is
relevant to the painting by Derain, but not to
the painting by Rothko.
14PROBLEMS FOR BELL I
- According to Bell, we know that an object has
significant form when it results in aesthetic
emotion, but when we ask what aesthetic emotion
is, the answer is that it is what is produced by
significant form. - Thus significant form seems to be defined in
terms of its relation to aesthetic emotion at the
same time that aesthetic emotion is defined in
terms of its relation to significant form. - This is circular.
15PROBLEMS FOR BELL II
- It is artworks which are said to have significant
form, but an object qualifies as an artwork in
virtue of having significant form. - Thus it seems that the notions of artwork,
significant form, and aesthetic emotion are
defined in terms of one another.
16PROBLEMS FOR BELL III
- Bell only talks about aesthetic experience in
terms of a distinctive kind of emotion which
artworks produce. But can we rule out that some
artworks produce an intellectual response that
deserves to be called aesthetic? - For Bell, the subject matter of a visual artwork
is irrelevant, only form is relevant. But surely
the subject matter of some works is relevant to
our aesthetic appreciation of it.
17PABLO PICASSO (1880-1973)
Guernica, Pablo Picasso, 1937
There is no doubt that Picassos Guernica has
significant form. However, is not the subject
matter extremely relevant to the success of the
painting, and to dictating the nature of the
response we have to it as perceivers? That is, we
do not merely respond to it formally, but have an
emotional reaction to the brutality of war. And
part of the aesthetic success of the painting is
in the way in which the horror of its subject
matter is depicted.
18PROBLEMS FOR BELL IV
- Finally, we can ask Is the point of all art to
be aesthetic? - however aesthetic is to be
defined, and whether or not it might include
intellectual in addition to emotional experience.
Is it not legitimate to ask if art can do things
other than provide aesthetic emotion, and things
which are culturally significant? (Recall
Duchamps readymades, and Minimal and Conceptual
art.) - That is, Bells theory seems to be too simple to
account for the wide variety of visual artworks
and what we experience in experiencing them.
19GREENBERGIAN MODERNISM I
- Clement Greenberg (1909-1994) The essence of
Modernism lies in the use of the characteristic
methods of a discipline to criticize the
discipline itself . . . to entrench it more
firmly in its area of competence. - Modernism for Greenberg begins with Kant, since
Kant used philosophy to criticize philosophy.
20GREENBERGIAN MODERNISM II
- The procedure of Modernism is self-criticism, or
criticism from the inside, that is, through the
procedures themselves of that which is being
criticized. - The arts are valuable when they are capable of
demonstrating 1) that the kind of experience
they provided was valuable in its own right and
2) that experience could not be obtained from
any other kind of activity.
21GREENBERGIAN MODERNISM III
- For Modernism 1) art in general has to use and
exhibit what is unique and irreducible to art
in general and 2) each particular art form has
to use and exhibit what is unique and
irreducible to that art form. - Each art had to determine, through operations
peculiar to itself, the effects peculiar and
exclusive to itself. - An art form becomes more insular because of this,
but by becoming more narrow it becomes more pure.
22GREENBERGIAN MODERNISM IV
- An art form discovers its area of competence by
focusing on what it shares with no other art
form. - By focusing on what is unique to the nature of
its medium, an art form is rendered pure. - Each art form should eliminate whatever it shares
with any other art form, or eliminate any effects
that might be produced from experiencing a
different kind of art form.
23MODERNIST PAINTING I
- Realistic or illusionist art is not Modernist,
since it directs attention away from rather than
to the unique characteristics of painting. - The unique characteristics of painting are 1)
its flat surface 2) the shape of its support 3)
the properties of pigment.
24MODERNIST PAINTING II
- Manet is the first Modernist painting because his
work draws attention to their surfaces. (Point 1
about flatness). - The Impressionists continued the Modernist trend
by drawing attention to paint as paint. (Point 3
about pigment). - Cézanne replaced more fluid forms of
representation with geometrical forms which were
fit more explicitly to the rectangular shape of
the canvas. (Point 3 about the shape of the
support).
25EDOUARD MANET (1832-1883)
The Balcony, Eduard Manet, 1869
Le Bar aux Folies-Bergère, Edouard Manet,
1881-1882
26CLAUDE MONET (1840-1926)
Water Lilies, Green Reflection, Left Part Claude
Monet, 1916-1923
27PAUL CÉZANNE (1839-1906)
Monte Sainte-Victoire Seen from Les Lauves, Paul
Cézanne, 1904-1906
28MODERNIST PAINTING III
- Although pigment as pigment (color), and the
shape of the support (typically rectangular) are
important aspects of Modernist painting, it is
flatness which is most important. - The rectangular shape of the painting support -
stretcher bars - is found in the curtain frame of
the theater. - Color is found in theater, sculpture, film,
photography, etc.
29MODERNIST PAINTING IV
- Modernist painting is directed towards flatness
since flatness is the only condition which
painting shared with no other art. - Although the surfaces of representational
paintings are flat, they draw attention away from
their flatness through illusion. - In representational painting one is aware of
illusion first, flatness second. - In Modernist painting one is aware of flatness
first, and there is no illusion.
30MODERNIST PAINTING V
- Even the barest or most primitive kind of
illusion will suggest a 3-d space beyond the
surface of the canvas. And for Greenberg this
alienates painting from its unique feature in
the arts of two-dimensionality. - Three-dimensionality is the province of
sculpture, and to keep its purity, painting must
disassociate itself from sculpture. And in this
disassociation it becomes abstract.
31MODERNIST PAINTING VI
- The focus of Modernist painting is on purely
optical experience which lacks tactile
associations. - One achieves that focus through concentrating on
flatness and the delimitation of flatness. - However, flatness is never a complete flatness
since even a single line drawn on a surface
destroys its virtual flatness. For instance,
even Mondrians work suggests a strictly optical
(not tactual) third dimension.
32PIET MONDRIAN (1872-1944)
Composition with Yellow, Blue, and Red 1939-1942
33MODERNIST PAINTING VII
- Modernist painting must concentrate on visual
experience as visual, and make no reference to
other kinds of experience. Particularly, it
should avoid reference to tactual space or a
space into which or through which one could
imagine walking. - By concentrating on the surface of the painting
as two-dimensional, painting becomes optical, and
entirely loses its literary character.
34KENNETH NOLAND (1924-)
Thrust, 1963
35Mysteries Solar, Kenneth Noland, 1999
36MORRIS LOUIS (1912-1962)
Autumnal, 1959
133, 1962
37MORRIS LOUIS (1912-1962)
Beta Kappa, 1961
38JULES OLITSKI (1922-)
Third Stride, 1971
39MODERNISM, SCIENCE, AND SELF-CRITICISM
- After talking of Kant, Greenberg now says that
self-criticism finds its perfect expression in
science rather than philosophy. - Here self-criticism means that the problems of
a discipline are addressed and solved in terms of
the nature of that discipline. - For Modernist painting, this means that the
aesthetic problems of painting must be addressed
in terms of the nature of painting - colors
spread on a flat two-dimensional surface in such
a way that no subject matter is represented but
only non-objective shapes are utilized.
40AGNES MARTIN (1912-)
Untitled, 1963
White Flower, 1960
41Untitled, Agnes Martin, 1997
42MODERNISM AND AESTHETIC VALUE
- Greenberg says that aesthetic value does not
follow necessarily from attending merely to
flatness. That is, one must look at the results
of a method, and not merely the method itself -
which may or may not lead to good results.
43THE NATURE OF MODERNISMS SELF-CRITICISM
- Modernisms self-criticism is carried on in a
spontaneous and subliminal way. This recommends
an avoidance of technique that is similar to
Collingwoods rejection of craft, and hence has
something in common with expressionist views of
art. - Modernism as a theory about art developed out of
the practices of artists, it did not first exist
as theory from which certain artworks followed. - The immediate aims of Modernist artists remain
individual before anything else.
44MODERNISM AND ART HISTORY
- Modernist art does not break with the art of the
past, but develops out of it. - Modernist art represents part of the development
of art history, and so is continuous with it. - Greenberg Wherever Modernism ends up it will
never stop being intelligible in terms of the
continuity of art. And it does not change the
value of art that came before it.