Title: Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Mul
1Algorithms and Methods for Particle
Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very
High Particle Multiplicity
- TOF simulation group
- B.Zagreev
- ACAT2002, 24 June 2002
2ALICE Time-Of-Flight detector (TOF)R3.7m,
S100m2, N160000
3Problems
- Need of very high time resolution (60 ps -
intrinsic, 120 ps - overall) - High multiplicity dN/dY?8000 primaries (12000
particles in TOF angular acceptance) - 45(35) of them rich TOF, but they produce a lot
of secondaries - High background
- total number of fired pads 25000
gt
occupancy25000/16000016 - but only 25 of them are fired by particles
having track measured by TPC - Big gap between tracking detector (TPC) and TOF
- big track deviation due to multiple scattering
- TRD tracking ???
4Procedure
- Software framework for ALICE - Aliroot (ROOT
based GEANT3). Then we have the same
environment for simulation and reconstruction. - Tracking (Kalman filtering)
- Matching
- Time measurements
- Particle identification
5Matching
- Probe tracks algorithm
- Kalman filtering
- Combined method (Kalman probe tracks)
6Probe tracks algorithm
- All tracks are ordered according their transverse
momentum (the higher momentum the less track
errors) - Starting from the highest momentum track, for
each track at the outer layer of TPC, a
statistically significant sample of probe tracks
is generated and tracked in Aliroot (GEANT
geometry and medias, magnetic field etc.) - So for a given track we have a set of TOF pads
crossed by these probe tracks. We chose, roughly,
the pad crossed by biggest number of probe tracks.
7Probe tracks algorithm
Fired pads
The end of reconstructed track (?r, ?p) in TPC or
TRD
8Kalman filtering probe tracks algorithm
R1ltR2 but S1ltS2 !
S1
S2
R1
3?
R2
TOF
The ends of reconstructed track (?r, ?p)
TPC (TRD)
9Time measurements
- Time-amplitude and other corrections
- Time zero calculations
10Combinatorial algorithm for t0 calculation
- 1. Consider a very small subset (n) of primary
gold tracks. Let l1ln, p1pn, t1tn - length,
momentum and time of flight of corresponding
tracks. Now we can calculate the velocity (vi) of
particle i in assumption that particle is pion,
kaon or proton. - 2. Then we can calculate time zero
- 3. We chose configuration C with minimal
?2(C) ? (ti0(C) - ltti0gt(C))2
11Combinatorial t0 distribution (250 events)
12Results for t0 combinatorial algorithm
Now 30sec (PIII)
13t0 calculation, all tracks as pions
14T0 calculations with not matched hits
15Particle identification
- Simple contour cut
- Neural network
- Probability approach
16Mass distribution, 50 HIJING events, B0.4T
17Mass-momentum distribution, HIJING
18TOF efficiency and contamination
19Neural network PID
- ROOT based network constructor (Anton
Fokin, http//www.smartquant.com/neural.html) - 1 hidden layer perceptron (different number of
neurons) - output 3 neurons for ?, K or p
- input parameters mass, momentum and matching
parameter - Good results for not overlapping clusters of
particles. For realistic distribution performance
is not so good
20Mass-momentum distribution, HIJING
21Fit with 2D function
22Probabilities for PID, (1.5-2 GeV/c)
70
50
50
23PID at STAR experiment
p
e
K
?
24(No Transcript)
25Combine PID
y
gK(x,y)gK(x)gK(y)
1D cuts
gK(y)
kaons
pions
2D cut
gK(x)
x
26Conclusions plans
- A number of methods and algorithms were developed
for particle identification at high multiplicity
and background - Results obtained are reasonable and allow to
fulfil physical tasks - Plans
- Complete probability algorithm, combine several
detectors - Kalman filtering for matching
- Try to realize iterative algorithm for tracking,
matching and particle identification