Title: Total Dose Response of HfSiON MOS Capacitors
1Total Dose Response of HfSiON MOS Capacitors
- D. K. Chen, F. E. Mamouni, R. D. Schrimpf, D. M.
Fleetwood, and K. F. Galloway - Department of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science, - Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
G. Lucovsky and S. Lee Dept of Physics and
Material Science, North Carolina State
University B. Jun and J. D. Cressler Dept of
Electrical Engineering and Computer
Science, Georgia Institute of Technology
2Introduction
- Quantum mechanical tunneling significant in SiO2
- Charge trapping in HfSiON (Amorphous and
Crystalline HfO2) G. Lucovsky et al., IEEE
Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 53, pp. 3644-3648, 2006. - Total dose irradiation and constant voltage
stress - TID-induced charge trapping compared to previous
Hf silicate devices
3Device Description
- (HfO2)0.4(SiO2)0.4(Si3N4)0.2 Low-Si3N4 K 14.6
tox 15 nm - (HfO2)0.3(SiO2)0.3(Si3N4)0.4 High-Si3N4 K 12.7
tox 13 nm - Equivalent oxide thickness 4 nm
- The samples were prepared by remote plasma
enhanced chemical vapor deposition (RPECVD), with
0.6 nm SiON layer Rapid thermal anneal done at
900 oC
4Experimental Details
- 1-MHz C-V measurement at a rate of 0.05 V/s
Irradiated with 10 keV X-ray at a rate of 31.5
krad(SiO2)/min - Interface trapped charge density (Nit) unchanged
after radiation prerad Nit 3.8 x 1012 cm-2 - Relatively small gate leakage current (lt10 pA _at_
Vfb 1 V) unaffected by radiation
5Improvement Relative to Hf Silicate Devices
- TID-induced charge trapping factor of 17 less
relative to previous Hf silicate devices J. A.
Felix et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 49,
pp. 3191-3196, 2002
6Midgap Voltage Shifts
- Weak bias dependence
- Relative low mobility of holes in HfSiON similar
to hafnium silicates J. A. Felix et al., IEEE
Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 49, pp. 3191-3196, 2002 - Electron trapping
- TID-induced and substrate injection at large
positive biases
7Comparison of Low- and High-Si3N4 Devices
- Crystalline HfO2 in the low-Si3N4 film contains
grain boundaries - Negative gate bias show similar charge trapping
levels
8Constant Voltage Stress (Substrate Injection)
- O vacancies and interstitials in the Low-Si3N4
film favorable for electron trapping from
substrate injection - Defects located near the interface an important
source for electron trap sites
9Constant Voltage Stress (Gate Injection)
- Level of charge trapping much less compared to
substrate injection - Saturation occurs much earlier than substrate
injection case - Electron injection from the gate and movement of
charge centroid
10Comparison to Hf Silicate Devices
- Electron injection balances positive charge
trapping for positive and negative biases - ?Not factor of 17 smaller at 1 Mrad(SiO2)
- 1.2 x 1012 cm-2 Hf silicate
- 7.1 x 1010 cm-2 HfSiON
- Reduced charge trapping indicates superior
HfSiON film qualities (smaller bulk trap density)
and improvements in processing
11Conclusions
- HfSiON show drastic improvements in total dose
irradiation hardness relative to Hf silicate
devices - Crystallization creates grain boundary defects
especially vulnerable to stress-induced electron
trapping - Reduced charge trapping indicates smaller bulk
defect density in HfSiON film relative to Hf
silicates
12Acknowledgements
- Dr. Lucovskys group at NC State University for
providing the samples - Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
for supporting this work