GMOs and the Changing Use of Pesticides - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

GMOs and the Changing Use of Pesticides

Description:

'These biotech crops provide solutions for pest and weed control that can have added benefits. ... Current weed species with glyphosate resistance in the world ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: chrisbo4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GMOs and the Changing Use of Pesticides


1
GMOs and the Changing Use of Pesticides
  • Chris Boerboom
  • Extension Weed Scientist
  • University of Wisconsin - Madison

2
Herbicide Resistant Crops (HRC) The concept
CP4 EPSPS Roundup gene Ready
  • Soybeans Roundup Ready
  • Corn Roundup Ready, Liberty Link
  • Cotton BXN, Roundup Ready
  • Canola Liberty Link, Roundup Ready

3
Audience Survey
  • FACT
  • Herbicide resistant crops are fully resistant
    (no injury) to a specific herbicide such as
    Roundup
  • QUESTION
  • Will farmers spray more herbicide if they use
    this technology?

4
Public Perception
  • Biotech Critics
  • Herbicide resistant crops are resistant to
    herbicides so farmers will be spraying more
    herbicide, increasing food and environmental
    hazards
  • Charles Benbrooks study on Roundup Ready
    soybeans shows that the amount of herbicide used
    on these beans is two to five times the amount of
    spraying for conventional beans.
  • National Family Farm Coalition

5
Herbicide Use in HRC
  • Biotech Advocates respond
  • These biotech crops provide solutions for pest
    and weed control that can have added benefits .
    . . including a reduction in the number of
    pesticide sprays and reduced environmental
    exposure, reduced labor, higher yields,
    compatibility with more sustainable agricultural
    practices, . . .
  • Monsanto

6
Roundup Ready Soybeans
7
Soybean Herbicide Use Patterns(Major States)
8
Soybean Herbicide Rates (Major States)
3 increase with RR soybeans (Lin et al.
2001) 13 increase with RR soybeans (Benbrook
2001)
9
What do pounds of herbicide mean?
  • Herbicide programs in
  • Conventional Soybeans
  • Raptor at 5 oz/a
  • 0.04 lb/a imazamox
  • Pursuit Plus at 2.5 pt/a
  • Prowl at 1 pt/a
  • 1.25 lb pendimethalin
  • 0.06 lb imazethapyr
  • 1.31 lbs total
  • Standard herbicide program Roundup Ready Soybeans
  • Roundup UltraMAX at 26 oz/a
  • 0.75 lb glyphosate

Should it be a question of the number of
ingredients applied and their toxicity? Conventio
nal 2.8 ai/ acre Roundup Ready 1.4 ai/acre
10
Roundup Ready Soybeans in Conservation Tillage
11
Herbicide Resistant Corn
US Adoption in 2002 only 10 (LL RR) 24 less
herbicide applied in 2000 vs 1991
12
Effects of Herbicide Resistant Crops on Pesticide
Use
  • Large shift to glyphosate (Roundup) use in
    soybeans
  • Increase in total pounds of herbicide applied
  • Fewer herbicide ingredients and applications per
    field
  • Minor effect in corn to date

13
Effect of Herbicide Resistant Crops on Pesticide
Use
  • So what?
  • Debate has not evaluated toxic effects on
    applicators, food, or environment
  • Technology has lowered the cost soybean weed
    management (216M in 1999) and stifled new
    research
  • May further the adoption of conservation tillage
  • Herbicide resistant weeds are a concern

14
Will herbicide resistance threaten the success of
HRCs?
  • Wisconsin ALS herbicide use in 1996
  • Soybeans Corn
  • Pursuit 66 Permit 4
  • Pinnacle 47 Accent 22
  • Beacon 3
  • Python 4
  • Current ALS resistant weeds in Wisconsin
  • giant foxtail, green foxtail, eastern black
    nightshade, shattercane, common ragweed, giant
    ragweed, kochia, waterhemp

15
Will herbicide resistance threaten the success of
HRCs?
  • Current weed species with glyphosate resistance
    in the world
  • rigid ryegrass and Italian ryegrass
  • goosegrass
  • horseweed (30 of TNs cotton infested)

Solution Another herbicide will be applied or
tank mixed with glyphosate Consequence Added
cost and perhaps an added application, potential
injury, which erode the benefits of the
technology
16
Bt Crops for Insect Resistance
  • Bt Bacillus thuringiensis, a natural soil
    bacteria
  • produces a protein that is toxic to caterpillars
  • Bt Corn European
  • Corn Borer resistance
  • Bt Cotton tobacco budworm, cotton bollworm,
    and pink bollworm resistance

17
Bt Crops Perceptions
  • Biotech Critic
  • In essence, the plants are insecticides.
  • Green Peace
  • Biotech Advocate
  • Fewer pesticides will be sprayed and crop yields
    will be higher.
  • Cant directly state that Bt crops will replace
    toxic pesticides

18
Bt Corn Adoption
19
Effect of Bt Corn on Insecticide Use
  • EPA Because many farmers do not use
    insecticides to control European corn borer,
    large changes in insecticide use are not
    expected.
  • Estimates
  • EPA 3.9 million fewer acres treated
  • Benbrook increase from 4 in 1995 to 5 in 2000
  • Carpenter 1.5 decrease from 1995 to 1999

20
Potential Effect of Bt Corn
  • Bt Corn for Corn Rootworm Control
  • In the US
  • 9.0 million lb insecticide applied in 2001
  • Lorsban and Counter were 68 of total pounds
    applied
  • In Wisconsin
  • Regent and Force applied to 11 of corn acres
  • (16 of corn acres treated with insecticides)

21
Conclusions Pesticide use
  • Effect of herbicide resistant crops on pesticide
    use
  • - rate debate is relatively inconsequential
  • - toxicity and resistance are of greater concern
  • Effect of Bt crops on pesticide use
  • - acres treated is important applicator, food,
    and environmental issues
  • Effect of genetically engineered crops on
    pesticide use is a relatively minor point
    relative to other social/political issues.

22
References
  • Carpenter, J. E. and L. P. Gianessi. 2001.
    Agricultural biotechnology Updated benefit
    estimates. National Center for Food
    Agricultural Policy. www.ncfap.org/reports/biotech
    /updatedbenefits.pdf
  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J. and W. D. McBride. 2002.
    Genetically engineered crops U.S. adoption and
    impacts. ERS Agricultural Economic Report No.
    AER810. www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/
  • Carpenter, J., A. Felsot, T. Goode, M. Hammig, D.
    Onstad, and S. Sankula. 2002. Comparative
    environmental impacts of biotechnology-derived
    and traditional soybean, corn, and cotton crops.
    Council for Agricultural Science Technology.
    www.cast-science.org/biotechnology/index.html
  • Benbrook, C. M. 2001. Troubled times amid
    commercial success for Roundup Ready soybeans.
    Northwest Science and Environmental Policy
    Center. www.biotech-info.net/troubledtimes.html
  • NASS/USDA. 2002. Agricultural chemical usage 2001
    field crops summary. http//usda.mannlib.cornell.e
    du/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcs0502.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com