Title: A'Lyssoivan 18PSI, Toledo, Spain 27052008
1Influence of Toroidal and Vertical Magnetic
Fields on Ion Cyclotron Wall Conditioningin
Tokamaks
Presented by A.Lyssoivan LPP-ERM/KMS, Brussels
With contribution from G.Sergienko, V.Rohde,
V.Philipps, G.Van Wassenhove, M.Vervier,
V.Bobkov, J.Harhausen, R.Koch, J.-M.Noterdaeme,
D.Van Eester, M.Freisinger, H.-U.Fahrbach,
H.Reimer, A.Kreter, D.A.Hartmann, J.Hu,
R.Weynants, O.Gruber, A.Herrmann, D.Douai,
Y.D.Bae, H.G.Esser, J.G.Kwak, E.Lerche,
O.Marchuk, V.Mertens, R.Neu, U.Samm,
A.Scarabosio, C.Schulz, S.J.Wang, TEXTOR Team
and ASDEX Upgrade Team
2Outline
- Motivation
- ICRF Plasma / Antenna Coupling Characterization
- ICWC in TEXTOR and ASDEX Upgrade
- ICWC Extrapolation to ITER
- Conclusions
3Motivation
- ? ICRF discharge has a high potential for wall
conditioning (tritium retention, surface isotope
exchange, wall cleaning/coating) in the presence
of permanent high magnetic field. - ? Ion Cyclotron Wall Conditioning (ICWC) was
approved for integration into the ITER baseline
using ITER ICRF heating system. - ? Further development of the ITER relevant ICWC
scenarios with conventional ICRF antennas is an
important and urgent task.
4Plasma Production with Standard ICRF Antennas
RF Field/Waves excitation
RF Power e-collisional absorption
Neutral Gas e-collisional ionization
TEXTOR ICRF antennas
AUG ICRF antennas
f30.0 36.5 MHz, BT1.0-2.4 T, p(1-8 )?10-2 Pa
f25-38 MHz, BT0.25-2.5 T, p(1-10 )?10-2 Pa
5ICWC Optimization
ICRF Plasma Production
Removal Mechanisms
Antenna Coupling
Plasma Homogeneity / Extension
Fast Ions Generation
1. High Ion Cyclotron Harmonics, ? n?ci,
ngtgt1 2. Mode Conversion, ? ?ci
BTBV, BVltltBT
Fundamental Ion Cyclotron Resonance ? ?ci
6TEXTOR ICRF Plasma Characterization
ne, Te and Ppl vs BT
- ICRF plasma can be produced at any BT-field
- ?10?cH (BT?0.2 T) High coupling (??0.8),
density (gt2?1017 m-3) and homogeneity - ??cH (BT?2.3 T) improved coupling (??0.5) and
homogeneity
7AUG ICRF Plasma Characterization
(HeH2)-plasma vs He-plasma
- Mode conversion scenario in (HeH2)-plasmas
- Higher antenna coupling (up to 3 times)
- Better homogeneity and extension in radial
direction - Better performance at two frequencies
He, f30 MHz
HeH2, f30 MHz
HeH2, f130 MHzf236.5 MHz
BTBV vs BT
Vertical magnetic field improves plasma
homogeneity in poloidal dirction and extends it
towards divertor
BV
BT
BT
BT2.4 T, BV0
BT2.4 T, BV?0.02 T
8ICWC in TEXTOR(C-coated wall)
? see G.Sergienko, P2-45, 27/05/2008
Removal rate
Measured removal rate for m3 vs BT
Calculated absorbed power vs BT
- ?10?cH (BT?0.2 T) Effective conditioning due
to high antenna coupling and homogeneity possible
in both, low and high the BT-fields - ??cH (BT?2.3 T) Mode conversion in
(HeH2)-plasmas is the best scenario for ICWC
(coupling homogeneity fast particles) - Applied BV-field (BV ltlt BT) ? increased ICWC
yield
9ICWC in ASDEX Upgrade (W-coated wall)
Measured removal rate for m40 vs BT
Fast particles energy/power vs BT
- Benefit from mode conversion in (HeH2)-mixture
with ICR (??cH) location closer to the antenna - ICWC output correlates with fast particles
energy and power absorbed by protons - BV-field improves the ICWC effect
- Major concern ICWC homogeneity (efficient
cleaning from 25 of the AUG surface)
10ICWC Extrapolation to ITERscenario for operation
4
3
2
1
row 1 row 2 ?/3, f40 MHz row 3 row 4 ?/6,
f48 MHz
0.32 m
TOMCAT modeling (rpl?2.4 m, R06.2 m, BT3.6 T,
ne03x1017 m-3, Te05 eV) - Mode conversion in
(HeH2)-plasmas at two frequencies
11ICWC Extrapolation to ITERpower for operation
Modeling with 0-D plasma/transport code
- 0-D Plasma/Transport code
- ne?(1-4)?1017 m-3, Te1.5 eV, ?ioniz1-2,
p(2-8)?10-2 Pa ? - PRF-pl (ITER) 0.2-1.5 MW ? (?coupl?0.40) ? PRF-G
(ITER)?0.5-3.8 MW - Extrapolation from TEXTOR data (assuming similar
power density and ?coupl?0.40) - PRF-pl (TEXTOR) ? 12-30 kW ? P RF-pl (ITER) ?
1.0-2.5 MW ? P RF-G (ITER)? 2.5-6.0 MW
12Conclusions
- Inter-machine (TEXTOR, ASDEX Upgrade) ICWC
studies - Wall conditioning in the mode conversion scenario
in the presence of toroidal and vertical magnetic
fields (BVltltBT) may be considered as the most
promising candidate for application in ITER using
the main ICRF antenna. Better radial/poloidal
homogeneity of the ICRF plasma and its ability to
accelerate ions at the fundamental ICR may
contribute to improving the conditioning effect. - ICWC at high cyclotron harmonics appears also to
be attractive mainly due to very high
antenna-plasma coupling (??80) and plasma
homogeneity. However, the scenario needs
operating at high generator frequencies for the
nominal magnetic fields and does not produce fast
ions. - Modeling with the 1-D RF and 0-D plasma codes and
extrapolation from the existing machines give a
good evidence for the feasibility of using ICWC
in ITER with the ICRF heating system.