Title: COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL GROUPS Roundtable on the Review of the Financial Conglomera
1COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL
GROUPSRoundtable on the Review of the Financial
Conglomerates Directive8 September 2008
- Freddy Van den Spiegel
- Chief Economist FORTIS
- Chairman Consultative Panel CEBS
2The excellent experience of FORTIS
- Long tradition of supervisory cooperation in
Benelux - 4-Party Memorandum on supervisory cooperation for
FORTIS (2002) - Supplementary supervision of Fortis group
organised jointly - Periodical and occasional consultation processes
- Clear role for coordinator
- Clear goal/ambition of supervisors The
supervisors aspire to organize their co-operation
and their consultation in such a way that it
leads to a better understanding of and insight
into each others working methods and prudential
approach
3- The organisation of financial groups is changing
fundamentally
4The changing organisation of financial groups
- The old model
- A financial group as a number of rather
independent (stand alone) local companies owned
by a holding company
5The old model.
MotherCompany
Subsidiary (branch)Country AFront back
Subsidiary (branch)Country BFront back
Subsidiary (branch)Country CFront back
6The changing organisation of financial groups
- The new model
- A financial group as a fully integrated chain of
support and front office functions organised in
several countries
7The new model
Mother Company
Support function A
Support function B
Support function C
CFO
CRO
TreasuryManagement
Subsidiary (branch)Country A
Subsidiary (branch)Country C
Subsidiary (branch)Country B
8The new model a gradual development
- Banking groups done/implementation
- Insurance groups implementation/design
- Mixed groups implementation starts/design
9The changing organisation of financial groups
- The new model
- A financial group as a fully integrated chain of
support and front office functions - Key responsibilities at Exco group level,
organised by business line and support line
10- Functions increasingly organised at group level
- Strategy
- Capital management and allocation
- Risk Management
- Audit
- HR
- M A
- Operations/support (COO)
- Liquidity Management
- ALM
11- The organisation of financial groups is changing
fundamentally - which requires a change of supervisory approach.
12- Actual supervisory approach
- Essentially Solo supervision.
- Additional supervision at (sub) consolidated
level. - Cross border overlapping and inconsistency
reduced by home/host principle and under
further discussion - Cross business coordination almost inexisting
13- Actual supervisory approach
- is becoming increasingly problematic
- Inefficient because inconsistencies increase
costs without improving supervisory quality. - Ineffective because the solo operation can only
be fully understood as part of the consolidated
group. - and this inefficiency and ineffectiveness will
only increase in the future as financial
integration continues
14- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border/cross business organisation requires
Outsourcing. - - centralisation of functions requires
outsourcing of activities to sister/mother
company - - supervisors have to approve
-
- WHICH SUPERVISOR DECIDES?
15- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border/cross business organisation
Outsourcing. - National discretions/definitions
- - same transaction gets different supervisory
treatment, depending on the country/business,
which is against the principle of consistent
supervision - HOW TO HANDLE THIS DIVERSITY AT THE CONSOLIDATED
LEVEL?
16- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border/cross business organisation
Outsourcing. - National discretions/definitions
- Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
Solvency 2 - - models are approved by home (consolidated)
supervisor, but implementation is under control
of host supervisors - - Pillar II still separately under discussion in
CRD and Solvency 2 but concepts like economic
capital are calculated at central level - HOW TO AVOID INCONSISTENCIES, CROSS BORDER/ CROSS
BUSINESSES?
17- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border/cross business organisation
Outsourcing. - Reporting.
- National discretions/definitions
- Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
Solvency 2. - Cross border mergers.
- - cross border mergers require agreement of
supervisor(s) of acquirer and of supervisor(s) of
the acquired institution - WHO WILL DECIDE?
18- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border/cross business organisation
Outsourcing. - National discretions/definitions
- Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
solvency 2. - Cross border mergers.
- Supervisory process.
- - Administrative processes are organised at
consolidated level - HOW TO COPE WITH UNCOORDINATED SUPERVISORY
ACTIVITIES OF SUPERVISORS
19- Some examples of increasing complexity.
- Cross border organisation Outsourcing.
- National discretions/definitions
- Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
Solvency 2. - Cross border mergers.
- Supervisory process.
- Crisis management
- - Which supervisor(s) will take decisions in
case of crisis of a group? - HOW TO AVOID CHAOS?
20- The way forward a Copernican revolution.
From Solo supervision additional checks and
balance at consolidated level
To Full consolidated supervision Additional
checks and balances at solo level
URGENTLY NEEDED NOW FOR BANKING GROUPS URGENTLY
NEEDED NOW FOR INSURANCE GROUPS GRADUALLY NEEDED
FOR MIXED GROUPS
21- Which future model for supervision of financial
groups?
- SHOULD BE IN LINE WITH POLITICAL CHOICES
- If light touch supplementary supervision of
limited issues (double gearing, concentration,) - ONLY MARGINAL CHANGES REQUIRED
- Avoid inconsistency/incoherence
- Avoid unproductive overlaps
- If towards more consolidated supervision
- IMPORTANT REDESIGN REQUIRED
- Cross border harmonisation/coordination
- Cross business consistency/coordination
22- Which future model for supervision of financial
groups?
- SOME PRIORITIES LEARNING FROM CRD AND SOLVENCY 2
- Harmonise/clarify definitions (Capital)
- Harmonise/clarify leading role of
consolidating/coordinating/group supervisor - Harmonise/clarify role of college
- Coordinate 3 Pillar approach (Pillar2)
- Harmonise/clarify role of level III Committees
- Cross business supervisory convergence how far
should it go?