COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL GROUPS Roundtable on the Review of the Financial Conglomera - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL GROUPS Roundtable on the Review of the Financial Conglomera

Description:

... of supervisory cooperation in Benelux ... Supplementary supervision of Fortis group ... Clear goal/ambition of supervisors: 'The supervisors aspire to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: U119
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL GROUPS Roundtable on the Review of the Financial Conglomera


1
COORDINATION OF SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL
GROUPSRoundtable on the Review of the Financial
Conglomerates Directive8 September 2008
  • Freddy Van den Spiegel
  • Chief Economist FORTIS
  • Chairman Consultative Panel CEBS

2
The excellent experience of FORTIS
  • Long tradition of supervisory cooperation in
    Benelux
  • 4-Party Memorandum on supervisory cooperation for
    FORTIS (2002)
  • Supplementary supervision of Fortis group
    organised jointly
  • Periodical and occasional consultation processes
  • Clear role for coordinator
  • Clear goal/ambition of supervisors The
    supervisors aspire to organize their co-operation
    and their consultation in such a way that it
    leads to a better understanding of and insight
    into each others working methods and prudential
    approach

3
  • The organisation of financial groups is changing
    fundamentally

4
The changing organisation of financial groups
  • The old model
  • A financial group as a number of rather
    independent (stand alone) local companies owned
    by a holding company

5
The old model.
MotherCompany
Subsidiary (branch)Country AFront back
Subsidiary (branch)Country BFront back
Subsidiary (branch)Country CFront back
6
The changing organisation of financial groups
  • The new model
  • A financial group as a fully integrated chain of
    support and front office functions organised in
    several countries

7
The new model
Mother Company
Support function A
Support function B
Support function C
CFO
CRO
TreasuryManagement
Subsidiary (branch)Country A
Subsidiary (branch)Country C
Subsidiary (branch)Country B
8
The new model a gradual development
  • Banking groups done/implementation
  • Insurance groups implementation/design
  • Mixed groups implementation starts/design

9
The changing organisation of financial groups
  • The new model
  • A financial group as a fully integrated chain of
    support and front office functions
  • Key responsibilities at Exco group level,
    organised by business line and support line

10
  • Functions increasingly organised at group level
  • Strategy
  • Capital management and allocation
  • Risk Management
  • Audit
  • HR
  • M A
  • Operations/support (COO)
  • Liquidity Management
  • ALM

11
  • The organisation of financial groups is changing
    fundamentally
  • which requires a change of supervisory approach.

12
  • Actual supervisory approach
  • Essentially Solo supervision.
  • Additional supervision at (sub) consolidated
    level.
  • Cross border overlapping and inconsistency
    reduced by home/host principle and under
    further discussion
  • Cross business coordination almost inexisting

13
  • Actual supervisory approach
  • is becoming increasingly problematic
  • Inefficient because inconsistencies increase
    costs without improving supervisory quality.
  • Ineffective because the solo operation can only
    be fully understood as part of the consolidated
    group.
  • and this inefficiency and ineffectiveness will
    only increase in the future as financial
    integration continues

14
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border/cross business organisation requires
    Outsourcing.
  • - centralisation of functions requires
    outsourcing of activities to sister/mother
    company
  • - supervisors have to approve
  • WHICH SUPERVISOR DECIDES?

15
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border/cross business organisation
    Outsourcing.
  • National discretions/definitions
  • - same transaction gets different supervisory
    treatment, depending on the country/business,
    which is against the principle of consistent
    supervision
  • HOW TO HANDLE THIS DIVERSITY AT THE CONSOLIDATED
    LEVEL?

16
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border/cross business organisation
    Outsourcing.
  • National discretions/definitions
  • Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
    Solvency 2
  • - models are approved by home (consolidated)
    supervisor, but implementation is under control
    of host supervisors
  • - Pillar II still separately under discussion in
    CRD and Solvency 2 but concepts like economic
    capital are calculated at central level
  • HOW TO AVOID INCONSISTENCIES, CROSS BORDER/ CROSS
    BUSINESSES?

17
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border/cross business organisation
    Outsourcing.
  • Reporting.
  • National discretions/definitions
  • Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
    Solvency 2.
  • Cross border mergers.
  • - cross border mergers require agreement of
    supervisor(s) of acquirer and of supervisor(s) of
    the acquired institution
  • WHO WILL DECIDE?

18
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border/cross business organisation
    Outsourcing.
  • National discretions/definitions
  • Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
    solvency 2.
  • Cross border mergers.
  • Supervisory process.
  • - Administrative processes are organised at
    consolidated level
  • HOW TO COPE WITH UNCOORDINATED SUPERVISORY
    ACTIVITIES OF SUPERVISORS

19
  • Some examples of increasing complexity.
  • Cross border organisation Outsourcing.
  • National discretions/definitions
  • Model validation / Pillar II in CRD versus
    Solvency 2.
  • Cross border mergers.
  • Supervisory process.
  • Crisis management
  • - Which supervisor(s) will take decisions in
    case of crisis of a group?
  • HOW TO AVOID CHAOS?

20
  • The way forward a Copernican revolution.

From Solo supervision additional checks and
balance at consolidated level
To Full consolidated supervision Additional
checks and balances at solo level
URGENTLY NEEDED NOW FOR BANKING GROUPS URGENTLY
NEEDED NOW FOR INSURANCE GROUPS GRADUALLY NEEDED
FOR MIXED GROUPS
21
  • Which future model for supervision of financial
    groups?
  • SHOULD BE IN LINE WITH POLITICAL CHOICES
  • If light touch supplementary supervision of
    limited issues (double gearing, concentration,)
  • ONLY MARGINAL CHANGES REQUIRED
  • Avoid inconsistency/incoherence
  • Avoid unproductive overlaps
  • If towards more consolidated supervision
  • IMPORTANT REDESIGN REQUIRED
  • Cross border harmonisation/coordination
  • Cross business consistency/coordination

22
  • Which future model for supervision of financial
    groups?
  • SOME PRIORITIES LEARNING FROM CRD AND SOLVENCY 2
  • Harmonise/clarify definitions (Capital)
  • Harmonise/clarify leading role of
    consolidating/coordinating/group supervisor
  • Harmonise/clarify role of college
  • Coordinate 3 Pillar approach (Pillar2)
  • Harmonise/clarify role of level III Committees
  • Cross business supervisory convergence how far
    should it go?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com