Title: Joint Heavy Lift JHL
1Joint Heavy Lift (JHL)
Background/Key Issues
Guiding Questions
- Joint Heavy Lift (JHL) Concept - supports Mounted
Vertical Maneuver (MVM) and sustainment
capabilities - Rapid introduction and exploitation advantage
- Denys less tactically mobile enemy ability to
concentrate and exposes their flanks - Enables Commander to seize the initiative
- Exploits deployment momentum from intra-theater
maneuver - Closes gap between early entry and follow on
forces - Enables continuous sustainment from strategic
providers across discontinuous air, sea and
ground lines of communication - Reduces dependence on improved infrastructure
- Improves the operational significance / viability
of Seabasing
- How can Army - USMC improve development of joint
lift programs (e.g. JCA/JHL) to meet future
Services needs? - How can the Army - USMC resolve service
differences on asset usage and expectations? - What is the best joint airlift investment and
acquisition strategy given fiscal constraints and
capability gaps?
Army Position/Objective
External Viewpoints
- The Army Science Board (ASB)
- VTOL JHL is more effective, more fuel efficient
and has competitive program costs compared to a
Fixed Wing Super Short Take-off and Landing
(SSTOL) candidate - VTOL significantly reduces improved
infrastructure dependency - VTOL improves viability of Seabasing concept
- Vertical maneuver operations concepts are already
approved within the Joint Forcible Entry
Operations and Seabasing JICs - Vertical Take-off and Land (VTOL) is the best
conceptual solution - Request USMC support in the JROC/JCIDS process
- Navy concern - Seabasing supportability of VTOL
JHL - Believe it would require significant
modifications to ship fleet to support stowage
and landing requirements of larger 30 ton
aircraft - Air Force favors term - mounted aerial maneuver
(MAM) - Believe MVM is not a jointly vetted concept
- Favor a Short Take Off and Land (STOL) capability
that requires a 2000 ft or greater runway. - Defense Science Board
- No position on the merits or shortcomings of the
MAM concept - Addressed MAM but addressed its capabilities and
what needs to be done if this concept is pursued - VTOL aircraft present the toughest target to
anti-air weapons as they drop vertically into a
landing zone and lift off similarly
Desired Outcome Joint Collaboration
2Mobility Issues
- The replacement for the C-130 must
- Contain a larger fuselage capable of
transporting Future Combat Systems (FCS) and
Medium Weight Vehicles - Support Mounted Vertical (MVM) and Sustainment
- Incorporate capabilities envisioned in Seabasing
and Forcible Entry Operations Joint Integrating
Concepts (JIC) - Future Operating Questions
- How will Joint Force pursue Seabasing Concept?
- How will the Joint Force employ mobility assets
differently to support COCOMs throughout the
ROMO? - What type of austere access and reduced
infrastructure will the Joint Force need in the
future?
3Mounted Vertical Maneuver (MVM)
- The Army views MVM and Sustainment as envisioned
in the JHL as essential to support future
operations to - Rapidly introduce and exploit tactical movement
advantages over a less mobile enemy to deny their
ability to concentrate while exposing their
flanks - Conduct forcible entry and operational maneuver
from strategic distances using organic force
projection assets to the objective area without
the need for improved infrastructure - Exploit deployment momentum gained with
intra-theater operational maneuver to enable the
Commander to seize the initiative across the
ROMO, from sea or land - Quickly close the gap between early entry and
follow on forces - Enable continuous sustainment from strategic
providers to forward elements across
discontinuous lines of communication - Improve the operational significance and
viability of Seabasing
4Vertical Takeoff and Land (VTOL)
- MVM should incorporate capabilities present in
Vertical Takeoff and Land (VTOL) - Combines best aspects of both fixed wing and
rotary wing aircraft to provide a truly
expeditionary capability to future Army
warfighting - Eliminates dependency on improved infrastructure
denying the enemy the ability to disrupt
operations using point obstacles - Exploits maritime maneuver space through
Seabasing construct - Enables rapid shift of task organized and combat
ready maneuver and sustainment forces across
breadth and depth of the battlespace - Supports SOF infiltration and exfiltration
- Technically and fiscally viable
5Directly Addresses a Wide Range of Recognized
Joint Capability Gaps
Joint Operational Significance
Self-Deployable Operations Initiated From
Outside the JOA
Joint Sea Basing - OMFTS Exploit Maritime
Maneuver Space
Aerial Sustainment / Distributed Logistics to
Point of Need
SOF Mission Sets Extends Reach, Access, And
Precision
Airborne and Ground Refueling
Enables Assured Access w/i JOA Mounted Vertical
Maneuver
PLUS.
Disaster Relief Domestic International
Homeland Security Response
Coalition Building / COIN/SSTRO
6Joint Vertical Lift A Transformational
Capability Essential to Execute Joint Doctrine
- Use of the sea as maneuver space to create
uncertainty for adversaries and provide force
protection, while supporting the capacity to
rapidly assemble and organize scalable joint
force capabilities for accomplishment of a broad
range of military missions without initially
violating national sovereignties or relying on
immediate access to secure land bases - freedom to maneuver vertically to objectives
within the JOA (Seabasing, P. 24) -
- enable our forces to maneuver effectively to
gain - positional advantage, avoid battlefield obstacles
and successfully attack the adversary even in the
face of numerically superior forces (TPG p. 16) - Increase the convergence in speed of deployment,
speed of employment and speed of sustainment (TPG
P. 36) - improvements to logistics systems include
innovations in delivery platforms (for example,
range, payload, and speed) - mission-tailored capabilities at the desired
point of action from dispersed locations around
the globe, regardless of anti-access or
area-denial environments.