Title: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF SLOT MACHINES FOR THE ERIE COUNTY AREA
1ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF SLOTMACHINES FOR THE ERIE
COUNTY AREA
- William N. (Bauschard) Thompson
- Professor of Public Administration
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas 89154
- wthompson_at_ccmail.nevada.edu
- 702-895-3319
- Pennsylvania State University, Erie
- Erie, Pennsylvania
- August 23, 2005
- Top Line
- Annual Economic loss of 104,929,356
-
- Bottom Line
2ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF SLOTMACHINES FOR THE ERIE
COUNTY AREA
- 1. It is About Trees. NOT!
- 2. A Frank Sinatra Story
- 3. Stonehenge, Rocket Science, Brain Surgery,
Bath Tubs - 4. Las Vegas is Economically Successful
- a. Inputs History, Synergy
- b. Outputs Eyes on the Prize
- 5. No Such Luck South Dakota
- 6. Will the Erie Bathtub Hold Water?
- 7. The Mathematics
- a. How Much Money?
- b. Whose Money? Where Do They Live?
- c. Where the Money Goes Taxes, Labor and
Expenses, Profits - d. Externalities Crime/Compulsives
- Bottom Line A Negative Number
- Annual Economic Loss -104,929,356
3ITS ABOUT TREES. NOT!!!!!!!!!!
4THE SOURCE
5PHD IN SCIENCE NOT REQUIRED
6EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS HOW A BATHTUB WORKS
7(No Transcript)
8LAS VEGAS ONE MODEL OF CASINO GAMBLING
9THE SOUTH DAKOTA MODEL OF CASINO GAMBLING
10WILL THE ERIE BATHTUB HOLD WATER?
- How much money?
- Gambling (only) revenues
- 4000 machines _at_75,000 300,000,000
- Five Million Visits_at_ 60 Per Visit
11WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM
- Base population Adult
- Erie County 280,000 196,000
- Crawford/Warren 133,000 93,000
- Ashtabula 103,000 72,000
- Chautauqua 138,000 97,000
- TOTAL 654,000 458,000
12WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM
- Casino Visits 6 for base 2,748,000
- 1 for surrounding area 2,252,000
- Play per visit 60
- Revenue Source
- Base Area 458T x 6 x 60164,880,000
Surrounding 2,252 x 60 135,880,000
13WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM
- TOTAL 5 mil visits x 60 300,000,000
- LOCAL DIRECT Discount 10 replacing current
gambling - 148,392,000 (49.7)
- EFFECTIVE NEW MONEY 151,608,000 (50.3)
14WHERE THE MONEY GOES
- Expenditures Stays/Area
Leaves/Area - Tax-State 34 0
102,000,000 - Local Tax 17 51,000,000
0 - Labor 16.8 34,632,000
15,768,000 - Machines 6.7 0
20,000,000 - Other Supl 5 7,500,000
7,500,000 - Building 4 12,000,000
0 - Admin/adv 4 8,000,000
4,000,000 - TOTAL EXP 87.8 113,132,000 150,268,000
15WHERE THE MONEY GOES
- Total Expenses 263,400,000
(87.8) - Profits 36,600,000
(12.2) LEAVES -
- Stays
Leaves - Distrib 100 113,132,000
186,868,000 - (37.7)
(62.3) - Local Money IN 148,392,000
(49.7) - Money RETAINED Local 113,132,000 (37.7)
- LOCAL LOSS (-35,260,000)
- New Money OUT/IN 151,608,000 (50.3)
- Money LEAVING 186,868,000
- LOSS TO OUTSIDE 35,260,000
16LABOR EXPENSE (NOTE)
- (Explanation Labor 16.8 50,400,000)
- 1200 jobs salary 30,000, fringes
- (include social security 12,000)
- minus 5,040,000 social security
- minus 3,600,000 1/2 of fringe 20
- minus 1,728,000 96 of 5 state tax
- minus 5,400,000 15 federal tax
- MINUS 15,768,000
- STAYS 34,632,000 LEAVES 15,768,000
17EXTERNALITIES
- The Proposed Slot Machines represent a DIRECT
economic loss of - 35,260,000 to a local area of Erie County and
four surrounding counties. - But Its Worse--There are Indirect Losses Too
18EXTERNALITIES
- Social Costs
- Crime _at_17x 458T 7,786,000 (Casino related
crime costs local residents 17 per year) - -----------------------
- Pathological (.006--x 458T2748 x 10,053)
27,625,644 - Problem (.007--x 458T3206 X 4926)
15,792,756 - ------------------------
- TOTAL............51,204,400
- (Econ.Loss 33.6 17,204,678 Govt.Loss 7.2
3,686,717) - A "Social" Cost represents a loss that a gambler
imposes on an unwilling (non-gambling) fellow
citizen. Some of the loss becomes a loss to
governments, and some of the loss (33.6 of the
social cost) becomes a loss for the entire
society.
19DIRECT AND INDIRECT ECONOMIC LOSS
- -35,260,000
- -17,204,678
- LOSS to ECONOMY DIRECT 52,464,678
- But Its Worse, Isn't it? Proponents LOVE to
talk about the multiplier effect of dollars as
they spin around in the economy. - Guess what? The economic loss represents money
THAT WOULD HAVE SPUN AROUND if it would have
remained in the Erie Area. A conservative
multiplier of 2 tells us that by having a slot
machine casino (again considering only the
gambling revenue) in the Erie Area represents an
annual economic loss of 104,929,356 - Economic Impact Loss -104,929,356
20IF THE BATHTUB DOESNT WORK, ITS FAREWELL CRUEL
WORLD.