A Brief Review of Popular Approaches to Understanding Leadership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 78
About This Presentation
Title:

A Brief Review of Popular Approaches to Understanding Leadership

Description:

Abraham Lincoln. George Washington. Great Leaders ... role model, providing individualized support, recognizing accomplishments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:230
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: ronpi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Brief Review of Popular Approaches to Understanding Leadership


1
A Brief Review of Popular Approaches to
Understanding Leadership
  • Traits
  • Behaviors
  • Processes
  • Followers

2
Popularity of Leadership Research
3
Understanding Leadership
  • On immigration, there have been repeated calls
    for senators to take leadership on the issue.
  • In the 2004 Presidential debate, Bush showed his
    leadership on a number of important issues.
  • The Apprentice, 2006 Sean demonstrated great
    leadership skills during the entire season.

4
Leadership
  • There exist several different approaches to
    understanding and describing leadership
  • To understand leadership, we consider...
  • Traits (What traits do leaders possess?)
  • Behaviors (What do leaders do?)
  • Processes (How do leaders get things done?)
  • Follower (How does style reflect needs of
    followers?)

5
Trait approach to Leadership
  • Basic assumptions
  • All great leaders possess some outstanding,
    individual qualities.
  • These qualities are unique to great people and
    elusive for others.
  • The Great Man approach to leadership

6
According to the Trait approach
  • Certain people are born with leadership traits
    and only great people possess them.
  • Leaders are born, not made
  • Some traits predict
  • leader emergence which people become leaders
  • leader effectiveness which people are effective
    at influencing others

7
(No Transcript)
8
Who are great leaders in history?
  • Martin Luther King, Jr.
  • JFK
  • Gandhi
  • Mother Teresa
  • Princess Diana
  • Abraham Lincoln
  • George Washington

9
Great Leaders
  • In a sense, these leaders are defined by great
    individual characteristics
  • MLK, Jr. vision and perseverance
  • JFK charisma and communication skill
  • Mother Teresa compassion and self-sacrifice
  • Geo. Washington honesty modesty
  • Lincoln persistence and commitment to values

10
What are the great traits?
  • Selflessness (attention to group success)
  • Hardworking
  • Honest
  • Fair in handling conflict
  • Able to draw on the strength of others
  • Able to time the appropriateness of action

Lao-tzu, Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Its
Virtue). 6th Century B.C.
11
Great Traits
  • Homer, Iliad and Odyssey
  • Wisdom and Service to Others
  • Plato, Republic
  • Wisdom and Reasoning Capacities
  • Aristotle, Politics
  • Leaders help others seek virtue
  • Machiavelli, The Prince
  • Power and the ability to understand (and
    manipulate) social situations

12
What are the Great Traits?
  • Stogdill (1948) leaders were different from
    non-leaders along 8 personal traits

13
What are the Great Traits?
  • Mann (1959) 6 personality traits could
    distinguish leaders

A Reflection of the times (1959)?
14
What are the Great Traits?
  • Stogdill (1974) 10 traits that were positively
    associated with leadership

15
What are the Great Traits?
  • Lord (1986) An attempt to re-confirm the
    studies done by Mann (1959)

Lord argued that these personality traits made
discriminations between leaders and non-leaders
across situations
16
What are the Great Traits?
  • Kirkpatrick Locke (1991) it is unequivocally
    clear that leaders are not like other people.

According to these authors, individuals can be
born with these traits, they can learn them, or
both. These 6 traits make up the right stuff.
17
(No Transcript)
18
Advantages of Trait approach
  • Its intuitively appealing
  • We like to think of our leaders as great,
    outstanding, gifted, exceptional
  • There is a century of research to back it up
  • It provides a few benchmarks on what to look for
    (individual traits, core qualities)

19
Disadvantages of the Trait Approach
  • Offers a breadth of traits related to leadership
    But which are most important?
  • Defines leadership according to the leaders
    individual traits
  • Little or no consideration for the situation
  • No mention of follower traits
  • There is some convergence regarding the set
    universal traits, but still some ambiguity

20
A Model of Understanding Leadership
21
Trait approach to Leadership
22
The Trait approach
  • Started with the notion that Leaders are born.
  • Suggests that leaders can be distinguished from
    non-leaders by a universal set of traits
  • Note More focus on leader emergence, less on
    effectiveness
  • Organizations should select, develop, and train
    the right people with the right stuff.
  • Defines leadership as a set of traits without
    consideration of the follower or the situation.

23
Leadershipas an influence process
  • Leadership
  • Is not bound by positions of formal authority.
  • Is not a collection of admirable traits or a
    cluster of interesting leader-like behaviors.
  • Is shaped by fundamental assumptions about human
    nature.
  • Relies on the effective use of personal power,
  • Charisma, expertise, ethics, fairness,
    credibility
  • And on the use of effective communication
    patterns.
  • Storytelling, framing, persuasion

24
Process approaches to leadership
  • Explain the process by which relationships
    between leaders and followers are formed
  • Does not assign leader effectiveness to a set of
    traits or an orientation, but to a change in
    followers that is facilitated by leaders.
  • Does not limit leadership to positions of formal
    authority
  • We askHow do leaders get things done?

25
Process Forms of Leadership
  • Transactional leadership
  • Reinforce followers for successful completion of
    their end of the bargain (contingent reward)
  • Transformational leadership
  • Transformational leadership motivates followers
    to strive toward higher goals or vision that
    transcend their immediate self-interests
  • Transformational leaders
  • Are charismatic and trusted
  • Present a positive, appealing vision of the
    future
  • Are seen as agents of change and innovation
  • Encourage and support followers

26
Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership
  • Transformational Leaders
  • Idealized influence (Charisma)
  • Intellectual stimulation
  • Inspirational motivation
  • Individualized consideration
  • Transactional Leaders
  • Contingent rewards
  • Management-by-exception

27
Three DimensionsTransactional Leadership
  • Contingent reward
  • Exchanging resources for follower support
  • Management by exception-active
  • monitoring performance/taking corrective action
  • Management by exception-passive
  • intervening only when problem becomes serious

28
Transformational DimensionsSee MLQ
  • Idealized influence
  • serving as charismatic role model to followers
  • Inspirational motivation
  • articulation of inspiring vision to followers
  • Intellectual stimulation
  • stimulating creativity by asking questions,
    challenging assumptions
  • Individualized consideration
  • attending to individual needs of followers

29
What do effective leaders say
  • To express intellectual stimulation?
  • To provide inspirational motivation?
  • To express individualized consideration?
  • To exhibit idealized influence?
  • Is a leader born as transformational?
  • Can someone learn to be transformational?

30
Types of Leaders
Transactional
Transformational
  • Short-term
  • Monitoring
  • Controlling
  • Extrinsic
  • Efficiency (clock)
  • Operating within system
  • Long-term
  • Trusting
  • Empowering
  • Intrinsic
  • Direction (compass)
  • Changing system

What assumptions underlie a managers decision to
engage in each approach?
31
Support for Transformational Leadership
Correlations for TL are average validity across
87 studies
Source Judge Piccolo (2004)
32
Transformational Leadership vs. Contingent Reward
Source Judge Piccolo (2004)
33

Global Support for Transformational Leadership
Theory
  • Australia
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • North America
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • U. S.
  • South America
  • Dominican Rep.
  • Venezuela
  • Asia
  • China
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Africa/Mid-East
  • Egypt
  • Israel
  • Saudi Arabia
  • South Africa

EuropeFranceGermanyGreat BritainItalyNetherl
andsSpain
34
Support Across Occupations
  • Entrepreneurs
  • Upper management
  • VMI cadets
  • White collar employees
  • Union shop stewards
  • School teachers
  • Insurance sales reps
  • Chamber of commerce
  • School principals
  • Marine commanders
  • Methodist ministers
  • Presidents of MBAA
  • Middle managers
  • Supervisors
  • CEOs
  • Junior naval officers

35
Leadership Influence
  • If we broaden our vision of leadership beyond
    formal positions of authority
  • (i.e., we think of leadership as a process)
  • (i.e., take a follower-oriented approach)
  • then Leadership, Power, Influence Persuasion
    are strongly related.

36
What is Power?
  • The potential of an individual (or group) to
    influence another individual or group.
  • Influence is the exercise of power to change the
    behavior, attitudes, and/or values of that
    individual or group.
  • Note Its easier to change behaviors than
    attitudes, and easier to change attitudes than
    beliefs

37
Where does power come from?
  • Positional Power
  • Formal authority
  • Relevance
  • Centrality
  • Autonomy
  • Visibility
  • Personal Power
  • Expertise
  • Track record
  • Attractiveness

38
Myths Realities of Management
From Linda A. Hill (2006)
39
Charismatic Leadership
  • What is charisma?
  • How is it measured?
  • Does it matter?
  • How does it work?
  • Are charismatic leaders born or made?
  • http//www.history.com/media.do?actionclipidwbp
    _beschloss_broadband

40
CHARISMA
  • A special quality of leadership that captures the
    popular imagination and inspires unswerving
    allegiance and devotion.
  • A person who has some divinely inspired gift,
    grace, or talent.
  • Magnetic charm or appeal.

41
Who Wins Elections?
(1932-2000) Year Democrat Republican 1932 Frank
lin Roosevelt? Herbert Hoover 1936 Franklin
Roosevelt? Alf Landon 1940 Franklin
Roosevelt? Wendell Willkie 1944 Franklin
Roosevelt ? Thomas Dewey 1948 Harry
Truman? Thomas Dewey 1952 Adlai Stevenson Dwight
Eisenhower? 1956 Adlai Stevenson Dwight
Eisenhower? 1960 John Kennedy? Richard
Nixon 1964 Lyndon Johnson Barry
Goldwater? 1968 Hubert Humphrey? Richard
Nixon 1972 George McGovern Richard
Nixon? 1976 Jimmy Carter? Gerald Ford 1980 Jimmy
Carter Ronald Reagan? 1984 Walter
Mondale Ronald Reagan? 1988 Michael
Dukakis George Bush? 1992 Bill Clinton? George
Bush 1996 Bill Clinton? Bob Dole 2000 Al
Gore George W. Bush? 2004 John Kerry George W.
Bush?
KEY 89 (17/19) of the elections won by the more
charismatic candidate, irrespective of party
42
What Is Charisma?Webers Types of Authority
Authorityforms of domination people will accept
  • Traditional
  • the status quo rights of a powerful and dominant
    individual or group are accepted (religious,
    cultural, familial, as well as gerontocracy,
    patriarchalism, feudalism)
  • Legal/Rational
  • domination resting on "rational grounds resting
    on a belief in the legality of enacted rules and
    the right of those elevated to authority under
    such rules to issues commands"
  • Charismatic

43
What Is Charisma?Charismatic Authority (Ritzer)
  • "resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity,
    heroism or exemplary character of an individual
    person, and of the normative patterns or order
    revealed or ordained by him"
  • Charisma is a quality of an individual
    personality that is considered extraordinary
    followers may consider person to be endowed with
    supernatural or superhuman qualities
  • Charisma is a driving and creative force which
    surges through traditional authority and
    established rules
  • If the disciples define a leader as charismatic,
    then he or she is likely to be a charismatic
    leader irrespective of whether he or she actually
    possesses any outstanding traits"

44
Charisma Communication StyleAn Experimental
manipulation
  • Kirkpatrick and Locke (1996) train leader to
    show interest in task and participants'
    performance display nonverbal charismatic
    behaviors, including a powerful, confident, and
    dynamic presence through the following nonverbal
    behaviors
  • shaking hands,
  • alternating between pacing and leaning forward
    while sitting up straight throughout the
    experiment,
  • making eye contact when speaking,
  • using hand gestures for emphasis when speaking,
  • displaying animated facial expressions when
    speaking,
  • using paralinguistic behaviors such as speaking
    with a captivating and engaging voice tone,
    varying the pace and the loudness of speaking,
    and pausing to emphasize points

45
Measuring Charisma MLQ
  • Talks about his/her most important values and
    beliefs
  • Instills pride in me for being associated with
    him/her
  • Specifies the importance of having a strong sense
    of purpose
  • Goes beyond self-interest for the good of the
    group
  • Acts in ways that build my respect
  • Considers the moral and ethical consequences of
    decisions
  • Displays a sense of power and confidence
  • Emphasizes the importance of having a collective
    sense of mission

46
Does Charisma Matter?
Quality of Performance on In-Basket
Exercise 1Poor managerial performance 5Excellen
t material performance
Source Howell Frost, OBHDP, 1989
47
Does Charisma Matter?Bush v. Gore GW the
Comedian
Source Gallup Poll--August 29, 2000
48
Does Charisma Matter?Bush v. Kerry
t3.05, pBush deemed significantly more charismatic
than Kerry the difference was 13
Average Charisma Rating
49
Does It Matter? Charisma at FedEx
  • 1 criteria for assessing leaders Charisma
  • Instills faith, respect and trust, has special
    gift of seeing what others need to consider,
    conveys a strong sense of mission

Score on measure of transformational leadership
in standard deviation units
50
How Does Charisma Work? View I
  • Three core components of charismatic leadership
    (Kirkpatrick Locke, JAP, 1996)
  • communicating a vision
  • implementing the vision
  • demonstrating a charismatic communication style

51
How Does Charisma Work? View I Communicating a
Vision
  • A vision is a general transcendent ideal that
    represents shared values it is often ideological
    in nature and has moral overtones
  • Vision may be effective because it
  • arouses followers' needs and values (House,
    1977),
  • is highly discrepant from the status quo but
    still within the realm of acceptance and thus
    challenges followers (Conger Kanungo, 1987), or
  • generally directs attention toward desired
    outcomes and away from undesired or irrelevant
    aspects of performance.

52
How Does Charisma Work? View IVision
Implementation
  • A leader must go beyond simply communicating a
    vision in order for it to affect
    followers--serving as an appropriate role model,
    providing individualized support, recognizing
    accomplishments
  • Kirkpatrick and Locke (1996) study one aspect of
    vision implementation task cues
  • Task cues includes clarifying what is to be
    accomplished or how the task is to be done
    (structuring behaviors, task clarification, task
    strategies, and intellectual stimulation)

53
How Does It Work? View I Charismatic
Communication Style
  • Charismatic leaders speak with a captivating
    voice tone make direct eye contact show
    animated facial expressions and have a powerful,
    confident, and dynamic interaction style
  • A charismatic communication style may be
    effective because it encompasses powerful
    nonverbal tactics that demonstrate commitment to
    the vision show that the leader is energized by
    the vision and reveal a confident, powerful
    presence (Howell Frost, 1989)

54
How Does It Work? View IIPhases of Charismatic
Leadership
  • Phase I Identification
  • Person with charismatic personality perceives a
    social situation as conducive to radical change
  • Ascent to leadership begins by recognizing a
    distressed constituency that has passively
    accepted its distressful situation
  • Leader articulates a vision of change that
    embodies important shared values with
    constituency and promises a better future
  • Phase II Activity Arousal
  • Leader expresses confidence in followers ability
    to achieve vision, and leads people to
    participate
  • Phase III Commitment
  • Leaders make public demonstrations of their
    dedication to the causemay involve significant
    personal sacrifice or even danger
  • Whether change becomes routinized depends on
    social situation

55
Role of Context--Attribution and Crisis Source
Bligh, Kohles, and Meindl (JAP, 2004)
  • Bushs speeches, and press reports, displayed
    more rhetorical characteristics indicative of
    charismatic communication after 9/11 than before

Study 1speeches, Study 2media coverage
56
Communicating with Charisma
Patton
MLK, Jr.
Ruth Simmons
57
Communicating with Charisma
  • Frame your mission around intrinsically appealing
    goals and draw upon your values and beliefs in
    doing so
  • When framing the goal, do so in terms of (a) the
    significance of the mission (b) why it has
    arisen in the first place
  • Employ metaphors, analogies, and stories when
    speaking
  • Allow your emotions to surface as you speak

58
Leadership Persuasion
  • Storytelling
  • Framing
  • Persuasive Communication Patterns

59
An opportunity for Gain
  • A
  • You will get 1000 with certainty
  • B
  • You will have 50 of getting 2500 50 of
    getting 0

60
The potential for Loss
  • A
  • You will lose 1000 with certainty
  • B
  • You will have 50 chance of losing 2500 50
    chance of losing 0

61
Prospect Theory
  • In general, decision-makers are risk averse in
    the gain frame risk-seeking in the loss
    frame
  • Although expected value of outcomes is identical
    in each frame, preferences for risk shift based
    on how decision scenario is introduced
  • This framing effect represents a violation to
    assumptions of procedural invariance in
    traditional economic theories of decision-making
    and risk
  • In other wordsour preferences (and our choices)
    are shaped by the manner in which situations are
    introduced

62
Leadership Job Characteristics
Source Piccolo and Colquitt (2006)
63
Points to Ponder Power
  • I am not one of the desk-pounding type that
    likes to stick out his jaw and look like hes
    bossing the show. I would rather try to persuade
    a man to go along, because once I have persuaded
    him he will stick. If I scare him he will just
    stay as long as he is scared, and then be gone.
  • Dwight D. Eisenhower

64
Points to Ponder Power
  • Power is all perception. Its non-use is its
    most powerful use. The trick is to use the least
    amount of power to create the maximum amount of
    change. Someone who has elegance can apply power
    selectively, like a laser, and carefully, almost
    unobtrusively, so that you dont feel youre
    being overpowered. You feel youre being
    motivated.
  • Peter Gruber, quoted by Diane K. Shah in New York
    Times Magazine.

65
Power is
  • based on dependencies
  • given to leaders by followers
  • situationally dependent
  • based (in part) on individual needs
  • the exercise of interpersonal influence

66
Exercising Influence
  • All influential managers have power, but not all
    powerful managers have influence
  • How can you convert power into influence?
  • Empower those on who you are dependent
  • Cultivate networks, mutually beneficial
    relationships with those on whom you are
    dependent
  • Utilize influential communication patterns

67
Framing
  • Framing is the process of selectively using
    frames to invoke a particular image or idea
    (e.g., gain vs. loss).
  • We have an interesting challenge ahead of
    us.
  • We have a difficult problem to face.
  • Political terms such as "tax relief" are
    successful framing devices the frame relates to
    positive cultural metaphors and shapes the
    subsequent discourse.
  • The one who brings about pain or distress is bad.
    The one who brings relief is a hero.

68
Framing and Setting the Agenda
  • From a political perspective, if one considers
    the importance of agenda setting, it becomes
    clear that the concepts of framing and agenda
    setting are linked. Establish the frame ? Set the
    Agenda
  • By constantly invoking a particular frame, the
    framing party is able to effectively control the
    discourse and set the agenda.
  • Newt Gingrichs Plan for the GOP

69
Tax Relief
  • On the day that George W. Bush took office, the
    words "tax relief" started appearing in White
    House communiqués.
  • By refocusing the structure away from one frame
    (tax burden or tax responsibility) to another
    (tax relief), framers are able to set the
    agenda and direct the nature of questions to be
    asked in future.

70
"Framing the Dems How conservatives control
political debate and how progressives can take it
back." The American Prospect. Volume 14 (8),
September 2003.
  • "Taxes are an affliction, proponents of taxes are
    the causes of affliction (the villains), the
    taxpayer is the afflicted (the victim) and the
    proponents of tax relief are the heroes who
    deserve the taxpayers' gratitude.
  • Those who oppose tax relief are bad guys who want
    to keep relief from the victim of the affliction,
    the taxpayer.
  • Every time the phrase tax relief is used, and
    heard or read by millions of people, this view of
    taxation as an affliction and conservatives as
    heroes gets reinforced."

71
The President's Agenda for Tax Relief
  • The President has proposed a bold and fair tax
    relief plan that will reduce the inequities of
    the current tax code and help ensure that America
    remains prosperous.
  • This tax relief plan promotes the values that
    make the American economy second to none --
    access to the middle class, family, equal
    opportunity, and the entrepreneurial spirit.
  • This plan will reduce taxes for everyone who pays
    income taxes, and it will encourage enterprise by
    lowering marginal tax rates.

http//www.whitehouse.gov/news/reports/taxplan.htm
l
72
Increasing Tax Fairness
  • The current tax code is full of inequities. Many
    single moms face higher marginal tax rates than
    the wealthy. Couples frequently face a higher tax
    burden after they marry.
  • The majority of Americans cannot deduct their
    charitable donations. Family farms and businesses
    are sold to pay the death tax. And the owners of
    the most successful small businesses share nearly
    half of their income with the government.
  • President Bush's tax cut will greatly reduce
    these inequities. It is a fair plan that is
    designed to provide tax relief to everyone who
    pays income taxes.

http//www.whitehouse.gov/news/reports/taxplan.htm
l
73
Persuasive Language?
  • Power vs. Force
  • George Carlins Euphemisms

74
(No Transcript)
75
Anchoring
  • Anchoring is a term used in psychology to
    describe the common human tendency to rely too
    heavily, or "anchor," on one trait or one piece
    of information when making decisions.
  • During normal decision making, individuals
    anchor, or overly rely, on specific information
    or a specific value - then adjust to that value
    to account for other elements of the
    circumstance.
  • Once the anchor is set, there is a bias toward
    that value.
  • Example a person looking to buy a used car may
    focus excessively on the odometer reading and the
    year the car was built use those criteria as the
    primary basis for evaluating the value of the car
    -- rather than how well the engine or the
    transmission is maintained.

76
Priming Non-conscious Response
  • Participants who had been exposed to a instance
    of rude behavior, were more likely to interrupt
    a subsequent conversation than those exposed to a
    polite behavior.
  • The subtle priming of college students with words
    associated with senior citizens (e.g., Florida,
    forgetfulness, weak) caused the students to
  • walk more slowly out of the experimental session
  • have poorer memory of features in the room

Source Bargh Williams (2006)
77
Support for the Use of Airbags
  • Air bags provide fatality protection in
    potentially fatal crashes.
  • Drivers protected by air bags experienced reduced
    fatality risk of 31 percent in purely frontal
    crashes (1200 point of impact on the vehicle),
    19 percent in all frontal crashes (1000 to
    200), and 11 percent in all crashes.

78
Airbag Safety
  • Based on the 11 percent effectiveness in all
    crashes, it is estimated that air bags have saved
    1,198 lives from 2001 through 2004, including 475
    lives saved in 1995 alone.
  • Overall effectiveness rates have steadily
    improved in the major car and truck categories.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com