THE 2003 WHO GUIDELINES FOR ARV USE: PERSPECTIVES FROM A USER PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 32
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE 2003 WHO GUIDELINES FOR ARV USE: PERSPECTIVES FROM A USER


1
THE 2003 WHO GUIDELINES FOR ARV USE PERSPECTIVES
FROM A USER
  • JOHN IDOKO MD,
  • UNIVERSITY OF JOS, NIGERIA

2
NIGERIA
  • POPULATION 130 Million
  • INFANT MORTALITY 79/1000
  • MATERNAL MORTALITY 80/1000
  • TOTAL FERTILITY 6.4
  • ADULT LITERACY 55.5
  • DEBT BURDEN 28 Billion

3
HIV/AIDS Figures- end of 2002
4
Median National HIV Prevalence Increase 1992-
2001
5
HIV Prevalence in States (2001)
6
The HIV/AIDS Pyramid
60,564 Reported AIDS Cases ( 2001)
1.2 million Estimated Actual AIDS Cases
(2001 Estimate)
3.1 million (aged 15-49) 3.47 million (all
ages) with HIV Infection (2001 Estimate)
7
Current national response
  • Political Commitment now present at the highest
    level
  • Establishment of new multisectoral structures
    (PCA, NACA, SACA, LACA)
  • New Plan with greater ownership (HEAP)
  • Broader funding base
  • Democracy has brought on more partners
  • Better understanding of the epidemic and what
    works

8
Key interventions planned and currently
implemented
  • Massive Awareness Raising Campaigns
  • Enhancing institutional and community capacities
    to respond to epidemic
  • Commencement of a large National Anti-Retroviral
    Therapy Programme
  • Improving surveillance, monitoring and evaluation
  • Redesign of supporting policies
  • Commencement of VCCT, MTCT, Vaccine, HBC
    initiatives etc.

9
Nigerian ART Program
The Federal government of Nigeria in February
2002 commenced a nationwide provision of HAART
using combination of generic forms of NVP, d4T
and 3TC at a reduced cost targeting 10,000
adults, and 5000 children.
10
Objectives of the Nigerian ARV Programme
  • To improve the quality of life of PLWAs through
    the provision of ART.
  • To strengthen the capacity of institutions
    designated to provide comprehensive care for
    PLWAs.
  • To improve the uptake of VCT in the country.
  • Ensure an ARV programme based on the best
    scientific evidence.

11
INCLUSION CRITERIA (adults)
  •   Patient 15 yrs
  • Patient confirmed HIV positive  
  • Ability to sustain access to ART
  •  Willingness to come for follow-up visits
  • Symptomatic HIV/AIDS
  • CD4 cell count of

12
Features (1)
  • 10,000 patients enrolled in 25 Federal tertiary
    institutions into the government program and
    another 5,000 in private capacity in private and
    Government health facilities (Total about
    15,000)
  • Highly subsidized drugs at 8/month
  • However, private patients are buying at
    prevailing commercial rate (100/month)
  • Monitoring tests and support treatment cost about
    50-70 every 6 months

13
Features (2)
  • d4T/3TC/NVP 1st line combination
  • AZT/ddI/IND 2nd line combination
  • TDF/ddI/LPV/r 2nd line combination
  • Efavirenz NVP substitute
  • Paediatric treatment started in 8 PMTCT sites
  • Monitoring of CD4 (all centres), viral load (4
    now, additional 4 centres soon),
  • Resistance testing planned for 2 centres (NIMR,
    NIPRD)

14
Results at 12 months
  • 10,000 patients on treatment in 25 centres
  • All centres tertiary institutions in 17 states
  • General comments on patients progress
  • Clinical improvement including wt gain
  • Increase in median CD4 counts in patients in all
    centres
  • Suppression of viral load to below levels of
    detection in 80 of patients (NIMR, Lagos)

15
Results from the Jos Centre
  • Jos centre serves 5 states in North Central Zone
    with population of 16 million people
  • Commencement of Programme May 2002
  • 1,698 patients on ARV, 700 patients sponsored by
    the Nigerian ART programme, rest paying as
    private (commercial rate)
  • Seven clinicians, 8 counselors and 2
    nutritionists
  • Laboratory support from APIN laboratory with
    capabilities for CD4 cell count (manual
    automated) and viral load recently available.

16
Results from the Jos Centre
  • 1,698 patients enrolled, 1/2 of patients enjoying
    national ART (8) and the rest paying at
    commercial rate (100)
  • 450 patients followed up for 12 months
  • 176 males and 274 females
  • Age ranges from 15 to 57 (mean37.7yrs.)
  • Major adverse Events (hepatotoxicity 3, steven
    Johnsons syndrome 1)
  • Withdrawals (4)
  • 2 clinical and immunological failures (ART
    experienced patients)

17
Figure 1 Monthly weight changes in patients on
ARVs
f
18
Figure 2 CD4 cell counts in patients
19
Advantages of the Nigerian regimen (d4T/3TC/NVP)
  • Affordable cost
  • Acceptable pill burden
  • Potent regimen
  • Can be used by men and women including pregnant
    women
  • Allows for preservation of other combinations

20
Disadvantages of the Nigerian Regimen
(d4t/3TC/NVP)
  • Contains NVP which is the major antiretroviral
    agent used for PMTCT
  • Drug resistance and cross resistance
  • Hepatotoxicity of NVP
  • Not effective in HIV-2 and Group O
  • Major drug-drug interaction with Rifampicin
    (Nigeria has high TB incidence)

21
Goals after one year
  • Scale up ART to all 36 states of the country and
    Federal Capital Territory (Abuja) from 10,000 to
    20-25,000
  • Achieve highest level of success (80
    suppression to below detection and 95
    adherence)
  • Prevent resistance by optimizing treatment
    options
  • Carry out evaluation to ensure success in all the
    above goals

22
Major considerations in provision of ART in
Nigeria
  • Access to limited number of drug combination
  • Poor health infrastructure
  • Need to deliver drugs to rural areas of the
    country where 65 of people live
  • High incidence of Tuberculosis
  • High incidence of HBV and (HCV)
  • HIV subtypes (CFR02) and sub-sub types HIV-1 A3

23
Table 1 Age and sex related prevalence of HIV,
HBV and HCV in HIV infected population on ART in
Jos, Nigeria
Idoko et al 2003
24
Considerations in ART scaling up in Resource
limited countries
  • Current tension is between the desire for
    immediate large scale access to ART vs
  • Provision of durable drug combinations with long
    term benefit and hence sustainable public health
    good
  • Balance between immediately available drugs
    against the development of durable agents
  • Therapeutic principle should therefore be if it
    doesnt work, better not to treat!

25
Durability and Scalability
  • The goal should NOT be lets get the drugs there
    and see despite enormous pressures to scale up
    in resource limited countries
  • We need therapeutic options that will last
  • Without proper evaluation, therapeutic problems
    (resistance) may crop up in 2-3 years
  • Hence before scaling up, there is need for
  • Information on effectiveness of regimens,
    patterns of resistance and co-morbidities (TB,
    HBV, HCV)
  • Monitoring and Evaluation
  • Validation of the programme

26
Urgent questions for the Nigeria ART program
before scaling up
  • What of patients achieve months on d4T/3TC/NVP?
  • What mutations are present in patients failing on
    the current regime?
  • What mutations in patients with
  • Any polymorphisms?

27
WHO Guidelines Questions that remain?
  • Are there ways to prioritize/individualize WHO
    guidelines on the criteria for starting ART?
  • Is there an appropriate CD4 count to initiate
    treatment of an asymptomatic HIV individual?
  • We need to explore the roles of various adherence
    strategies such as DOT, pill boxes, buddy systems
    on ART.

28
WHO Guidelines Questions that remain?
  • Further research is needed to understand
    resistance with single dose NVP especially as it
    impacts on outcomes of HAART programmes
  • We need further research to see if clinical
    monitoring is really sufficient for effective
    patient management of patients on ART.

29
Recommendations
  • We need to build capacity (human resources
    infrastructure)
  • We need to monitor programmes (commodity, MIS and
    drug security)
  • We need to monitor patients on ART to define
    clinical and immunological progress (CD4 counts)
    and have some reference laboratory monitor viral
    load
  • There is need for further reduction in the costs
    of ARVs (especially Brands), Tests Kits for
    Diagnoses Treatment Monitoring as well as the
    Treatment of OIs.

30
Recommendations -
  • We need to carry out Program Evaluation at the
    national level to ensure durability of treatment
    combinations
  • Resistance sentinel surveillance at national or
    regional level should be a vital component to
    track resistance profiles of available
    antiretroviral drugs
  • Collaboration at local and international
    Partnerships

31
CONCLUSION
  • As we work towards 3/5, we need to ensure
  • treatment strategies that will be durable
  • demonstrate success from the beginning
  • We must learn lessons from the use of NVP in
    PMTCT and more than a decade of experience using
    antiretroviral therapy

32
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com