Evaluation and Management of Hollow Viscous Injuries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation and Management of Hollow Viscous Injuries

Description:

More commonly the result of penetrating trauma than blunt trauma ... Small bowel anastomoses usually hand sewn or stapled. Grade IV and V resection and anastomosis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:207
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: isaa1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation and Management of Hollow Viscous Injuries


1
Evaluation and Management of Hollow Viscous
Injuries
2
  • Intra-abdominal hollow viscous injuries can
    include the stomach, small bowel, colon and
    rectum
  • More commonly the result of penetrating trauma
    than blunt trauma
  • Principles of operative management are generally
    the same

3
Blunt Trauma
  • Though uncommon, increased morbidity and
    mortality if missed or delayed
  • Abdominal tenderness after blunt torso trauma
    frequently associated with intra-abdominal
    pathology
  • Seat belt sign/flexion distraction fxs
    associated with increased relative risk of small
    bowel injury

4
Blunt Trauma, contd
  • Ultrasonography, CT, DPL the tools for evaluation
  • Ultrasonography
  • Highly specific and moderately sensitive in
    identifying intra-abdominal fluid
  • Does not reliably distinguish solid-organ injury
    from hollow viscous injury (though DPL may help
    differentiate between the two)

5
Blunt Trauma, contd
  • CT currently the imaging modality of choice
  • Isolated finding not greatly suggestive of
    hollow viscous injury
  • Multiple findings highly suggestive

6
Blunt Trauma, contd
7
Blunt Trauma, contd
8
Penetrating Trauma
  • Evaluation contingent upon peritoneal penetration
  • GSWs Generally necessitate exploratory
    laparotomy laparoscopy for tangential GSWs to
    rule out peritoneal penetration
  • Stabbings Laparotomy with obvious signs of
    peritoneal penetration (omental/bowel
    evisceration) otherwise, local wound
    exploration, and laparoscopy if fascial
    penetration is evident.

9
Penetrating Trauma, contd
  • Posterior vs. Anterior Stab Wounds
  • Posterior wounds carry lower risk of
    intra-abdominal injury
  • Evaluated with CT augmented by intravenous, oral
    and rectal contrast
  • Identifies posterior intraperitoneal violation
    and injury to retroperitoneal structures

10
Operative Management
  • Treatment of injury is dictated by location and
    severity. In general
  • Antibiotics is administered before skin incision
    and for 24 hours if injury is confirmed
  • Abdominal exploration performed through mid-line
    incision sufficient to access entire peritoneal
    cavity
  • After initial control of any significant bleeding
    is achieved, inspection commences in a systematic
    fashion

11
Operative Management, contd
  • Injuries to the Stomach
  • Treatment based grading system developed by AAST

12
Operative Management, contd
  • Grades I, II, III - primary repair
  • Partial thickness hemostasis and seromuscular
    closure
  • Full thickness hemostasis and closure in two
    layers
  • Grade IV dependant upon associated injuries
  • No associated injuries to duodenum, pancreas or
    esophagus distal gastrectomy and
    gastroduodenostomy
  • Associated injuries distal gastrectomy and
    gastrojejunostomy
  • Grade V complete devascularization or
    destruction
  • Perform near-total or total gastrectomy with
    Roux-en-Y reconstruction

13
Operative Management, contd
  • Injuries to the Small Bowel
  • Evaluated intraoperatively by running the
    bowel, from the ligament of Treitz caudad to the
    ileocecal valve

14
Operative Management, contd
  • Primary repair, resection or a combination
    thereof is employed at the discretion of the
    surgeon
  • Grade I reapproximation of the seromuscular
    layers with interrupted sutures
  • Grade II limited debridement and closure in
    either one or two layers
  • Grade III repaired primarily if luminal
    narrowing can be avoided otherwise, resection
    and anastamosis
  • Small bowel anastomoses usually hand sewn or
    stapled
  • Grade IV and V resection and anastomosis

15
Operative Management, contd
  • Injuries to the colon

16
Operative Management, contd
  • Colonic injuries further categorized as either
    non-destructive or destructive
  • Destructive - wounds that completely transect the
    colon (grade IV) or involve tissue loss and
    devascularized segments (grade V)
  • Patients with destructive colonic injuries who
    had
  • comorbid medical conditions
  • required transfusions of more than 6 units of
    blood
  • in shock
  • delayed operationsignificantly higher risk for
    suture line breakdown when managed with resection
    and primary anastomosis

17
Operative Management, contd
  • Non-destructive wounds (grades I-III)
  • Seromuscular closure for partial thickness
  • Primary closure for full thickness
  • Destructive wounds (grades IV-V)
  • Repair with resection and primary anastomosis
  • Destructive wounds with risk factors
  • Resection with end colostomy or resection and
    primary anastomosis with proximal diversion
  • Proximal diversion
  • loop colostomy (with open or closed distal stoma)
  • end colostomy (with a mucous fistula or closure
    of the rectal stump)

18
Operative Management, contd
  • Injuries to the Rectum
  • Classified according to anatomic criteria
  • Anterior and lateral sidewalls of the upper two
    thirds of the rectum managed in the same manner
    as colonic injuries
  • Upper two thirds posteriorly and lower one third
    of the rectum circumferentially - extraperitoneal
  • Upper two thirds - exploration and suture repair,
    fecal diversion with loop or end colostomy as
    adjunctive measure
  • Lower one third - explored and repaired if
    accessible Fecal diversion recommended
  • Wounds difficult to reach - proximal fecal
    diversion and presacral drainage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com