Title: Looking Forward
 1Looking Forward
- Colorados fiscal prospects after Ref C 
 - Preliminary findings  August 2007 
 
  2Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Four goals for our fiscal work 
 - Inform and help shape the debate over Colorados 
fiscal prospects after Ref C.  - Conduct research to identify where current fiscal 
trends will take us.  - Share these preliminary findings with community 
leaders throughout Colorado.  - Gather feedback and input to produce a final 
report.  
  3How we got here
Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
1982 Voters pass Gallagher Amendment to protect 
residential property tax payers 1991 Legislature 
passes Arveschoug-Bird 6 percent annual growth 
limit on the General Fund 1992 Voters pass TABOR 
Amendment - requires voter approval of tax 
increases - sets tight revenue limits that 
shrink government and limit its ability to 
rebound after economic downturns 1997 
Legislature passes Senate Bill 1, for the first 
time committing General Fund revenues to 
transportation 2000 Voters pass Amendment 23 to 
mandate a minimum level of funding for public 
schools 2002 Legislature passes House Bill 1310, 
committing excess general fund revenues at the of 
a year to transportation and capital construction 
 4Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
More of how we got here Late 1990s TABOR 
surpluses grow to more than 1 billion per year. 
Legislature cuts income and sales taxes to avoid 
collecting future surpluses 2001-03 Economic 
recession and historic drop in state revenues. 
Surpluses vanish. Legislature cuts state services 
by 1 billion annually and uses one-time stop-gap 
measures (including moving payday for workers and 
borrowing from cash funds) to balance 
budget 2004-05 Economy and revenues rebound, but 
TABORs ratchet effect prevents critical state 
services from joining in recovery 2005 Voters 
pass Referendum C to take a five-year time-out 
from the TABOR revenue limit. Legislature able to 
avoid future cuts, partially restore services  
 5Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Preliminary findings 
 - Projected General Fund revenues exceed estimated 
current services General Fund appropriations over 
the study period by an average of 466 million a 
year.  - However, estimated current services General Fund 
appropriations exceed the 6 percent spending 
limit in each fiscal year studied.  - This means Legislature will have to cut estimated 
current services General Fund appropriations 
between 275 - 350 million annually (including 
K-12, higher ed and health care) to stay within 
the 6 percent spending limit.  - Total TABOR revenue will be slightly below the 
TABOR limit (as amended by Ref C) when it is 
reset in FY 2010-11 through FY 2011-12 and 
slightly over it in FY 2012-13.  - However, projected revenue will likely result in 
TABOR rebates starting in FY 2012-13 and beyond.  
  6Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C 
 7Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C 
 8Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C 
 9Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Observations 
 - Maintaining the status quo current services 
budget will be a challenge.  - Is this where we want to be? 
 - Does this provide sufficient funding for 
important investments in K-12 education, higher 
education, early childhood education and 
transportation?  - The 6 percent spending limit will be an 
impediment to funding our estimated current 
services General Fund appropriations, even though 
there are sufficient revenues to do so.  
  10Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Observations 
 - Our estimates do not include funding for 
 - Initiatives to reduce drop-out rates 
 - Proposals from 208 Commission for Health Care 
Reform  - Proposals from P-20 Council. 
 - Raising higher education to level of peer states 
 - Maintaining highways at current levels 
 - Increased rainy day fund (8-10  of General Fund 
 - Increased support for veterans 
 - New capital construction projects 
 - Likely slower growth in federal funding 
 
  11Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
COLORADO COMPARED Total Expenditures per 1000 
of income 49 per capita 44 K-12 
education per 1000 of income 49 per 
capita 34 Medicaid per 1000 of 
income 49 per capita 47 CHP per 1000 of 
income 49 per capita 47 Higher 
Education per 1000 of income 49 per 
capita 47 Highways per 1000 of 
income 49 per capita 47 Source Carol 
Hedges, Aiming for the middle, COFPI. 
 12Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Observations 
 - We are all in this together. We cannot address 
one area in isolation from the others.  - Our revenue estimates also do not include an 
economic downturn. If that happens, revenues are 
likely to be lower.  
  13Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- We want your feedback 
 - Questions 
 - Comments 
 - Observations 
 - Send your comments to 
 -  Laurie Hirschfeld Zeller at 
 - Zeller_at_thebell.org 
 
  14Looking Forward  Colorados fiscal prospects 
after Ref C
- Contact information 
 - Rich Jones, Robin Baker and Frank Waterous 
 - The Bell Policy Center 
 - 303.297.0456 
 - jones_at_thebell.org baker_at_thebell.org 
waterous_at_thebell.org  - Alex Medler and Scott Groginsky 
 - Colorado Childrens Campaign 
 - 303.839.1580 ext. 244 and 275 
 - alex_at_coloradokids.org or scott_at_coloradokids.org 
 - Carol Hedges 
 - Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute 
 - 303.573.5669 ext. 309 
 - chedges_at_cclponline.org