Title: Sprawl in WNY and Other Places
1Sprawl in WNY(and Other Places)
- Environmental Law 2
- Spring 2007
2At the macro level, the trend is very clear
3--and we still move out
4But these macro trends are driven by micro
decisions
- Town and Village boards, city councils
- Zoning boards and zoning appeals boards
- Developers
- Investors
- Consumers/voters
5Searching for Sprawl, Part 2A Tale of Two
Streets
6Niagara Falls Blvd. sprawl
7Elmwood Ave. Urbanity
8. . . And classic architecture
9Moral A Starbucks is AlwaysA Starbucks . . .
10But a Regal Cinema blends in with its environment.
11Yes, there are better things on Elmwood than on
Falls Blvd.
12Elmwood Avenue has many things that are new and
good.
Unfortunately, the new things are not good, and
the good things are not new.
13Similar things are happening in housing
14New structures follow a pattern language
- A core solution to a recurring problem, that can
be varied in different settings
15What problems are the designers of these places
solving?
- Provide sufficient parking near the door (easy in
and out)
- Satisfy the needs of overscheduled people (easily
recognizable, no surprises, affordable, quick)
16The parking dilemma
- Stores dont work (and wont get financed)
without a floor-to-area ratio of about 50 to 60
percent
- The pedestrian-friendly feel of a place
disappears if parking gets above about 9 percent
17Planning today is driven by the need to provide
habitat for the evolved descendents of these
critters
18Car habitat destroys habitat suitable for
pedestrians and other biota . . .
19. . . Which has been resisted by some urban
ecologists.
20. . . and were still backsliding on
transportation
21The development formula fleeing from taxes,
externalizing costs
- Step 1 Move off of/out of the infrastructure to
lower your tax burden and escape problems - Step 2 When the dark side of being off the
infrastructure shows (road congestion, lack of
adequate groundwater, overcrowded/underfunded
schools, septic unable to handle the load)get
everyone to pay for solutions! - Step 3 Fight like hell to avoid any
responsibility for supporting the abandoned urban
infrastructure that now is running at deficit.
22This is beginning to sound familiar . . .
23What tools does the legal system give us to work
with?
24Zoning and Site Plan Review
- General zoning ordinance classes (R, C, I)
- Comprehensive Plans
- Overlay zones, special review districts
- Site plan approval
- Development exactions
25Some limitations in zoning
- Takings constraints (Nollan, Tigard)
- Variances, nonconforming use, rezonings
- Lack of comprehensive plans
- Lack of coordination
- Amateurs vs. experts
- Separation from environmental quality
26Environmental Impact Statements (SEQRA, NEPA)
- Better at tweaking design slightly or mitigating
harm than at stopping bad ideas - Funded by developer, staffed by consultants
- Cumulative impact assessment significantly
underdeveloped - State courts not very activist in policing strict
compliance - If nobody sues, nothing changes
27Other Legal and Market Tools
- Wetlands permits
- Bed and banks permits
- Yard and setback requirements
- CZMA review
- Floodplain construction requirements and review
- Conservation easements
- Transfer of development rights
- Public ownership (bargain, escheat, condemnation)
- Better private ownership (conservancies)
28The emerging Smart Growth toolkit
- Growth boundaries
- No subsidy for building off-infrastructure
- Design with Nature/Transit/Pedestrian Uses, or
for community interaction (nodes, mixed uses) - Brownfields rehabilitation
- Big investments in open space, mass transit
- Shared services, cooperative planning
- Fast-tracking preferred development
29An awkward question
- How much coercion or disincentive can we afford
in WNY--an area thats starved for economic
growth?