Economics 331b

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Economics 331b

Description:

Ineffective because so far from target (example of CAFE standards and congestion) ... Reference: Phil Goodwin, Joyce Dargay And Mark Hanly, 'Elasticities of Road ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: bil104
Learn more at: http://www.econ.yale.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics 331b


1
  • Economics 331b
  • Energy Regulation

2
Reasons for Regulation of Oil-Using Capital
  • Externalities
  • Local pollution
  • Climate change
  • Congestion
  • Road accidents
  • Macroeconomic/trade
  • Impact of oil price on business cycle
  • Optimal tariff
  • Political/military
  • Imperfect decisionmaking
  • Discounting
  • Split incentives
  • Poor information

3
First-best policy options
4
Inefficiencies with using second-best
energy-regulatory policies
  • Ineffective because so far from target (example
    of CAFE standards and congestion).
  • Ineffective because of rebound effect which
    arises when target wrong input (capital instead
    of fuel).
  • Ineffective because covers such a small fraction
    of market (automobiles in global carbon market).
  • Not cost-beneficial if already have energy taxes.

5
Economics of rebound effect
  • Assume that regulation increases energy
    efficiency of a capital good from mpg0 to mpg1
    . The question is whether the lower cost of a vmt
    (vehicle-mile traveled) would offset the lower
    cost.
  • Here is the basic economics

6
Economics of rebound effect
  • Basic results from many demand studies
  • Short-run gasoline price-elasticity on vmt
    -0.1 (0.06)
  • Long-run gasoline price-elasticity on vmt
    -0.29 (0.29)
  • Therefore, the rebound would be 10 to 29 percent
    of mpg improvement.
  • This can be applied to other areas as well.
  • Reference Phil Goodwin, Joyce Dargay And Mark
    Hanly, Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel
    Consumption with Respect to Price and Income A
    Review, Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 3,
    275292, May 2004, available at
    http//www2.cege.ucl.ac.uk/cts/tsu/papers/transpre
    v243.pdf

7
Discounting Issues
  • A common concern is that private-sector decision
    makers use discount rates that are higher than
    social discount rate.
  • Each of these issues has a different policy
    implication
  • Taxation capital taxes lead to wedge between
    social and private.
  • Social underinvestment leads to overall rate of
    return lower than social marginal utility
  • Behavior stuff People cant count
  • Capital market imperfections Liquidity
    constraints mean that the cost of capital to
    individuals is above-market because of borrowing
    constraints, bankruptcy,
  • Risk/CCAPM Investment has high correlation with
    total output (or more properly the MU of
    consumption)

8
Optimal tariff argument on oil taxes
  • Basic argument. The point is that the US has
    market power in the world oil market. By levying
    tariffs, we can change the terms of trade (oil
    prices) in our favor.
  • Regulation and taxes are a substitute for the
    optimum tariff.
  • Example
  • world supply curve to US Q Bp? , ?gt0
  • US cost of imported oil V pQ B-1Q(11/ ?) ,
    k an irrelevant constant
  • marginal cost of imported oil V(Q) (11/?)
    B-1Q1/ ? p (11/ ?)
  • So optimal tariff is ad valorem
  • t 1/ ? inverse elasticity of supply of
    imports
  • Reference D. R. Bohi and W. D. Montgomery,
    Social Cost of Imported Oil and UU Import
    Policy, Annual Review of Energy, 1982, 7, 37-60.

9
Supply of oil imports into the US
For numerical assumptions, see next slide.
10
Numerical example for US
11
Optimal tariff argument on oil taxes
  • t 1/ ? inverse supply elasticity.
  • Complications Formula actually is
  • Some notes
  • Supply elasticity depends critically on whether
    oil market is at full capacity (2007 v. 2009).
    Very inelastic in full capacity short run quite
    elastic when OPEC adjusts supply. (See next
    slide.)
  • The optimal tariff in terms depends upon the
    initial price because it is an ad valorem tariff.
  • The externality is a global externality for
    consuming countries because it is a globalized
    market.
  • Note this is a pecuniary, not a technological
    externality. So it is a zero-sum (or slightly
    negative-sum) game for the world. This has
    serious strategic implications and suggest that
    the diplomacy of the oil-price externality is
    completely different from true global public
    goods like global warming.
  • le

12
Price
Short-run production capacity
Production
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)