Title: Economics 331b
1- Economics 331b
- Energy Regulation
2Reasons for Regulation of Oil-Using Capital
- Externalities
- Local pollution
- Climate change
- Congestion
- Road accidents
- Macroeconomic/trade
- Impact of oil price on business cycle
- Optimal tariff
- Political/military
- Imperfect decisionmaking
- Discounting
- Split incentives
- Poor information
3First-best policy options
4Inefficiencies with using second-best
energy-regulatory policies
- Ineffective because so far from target (example
of CAFE standards and congestion). - Ineffective because of rebound effect which
arises when target wrong input (capital instead
of fuel). - Ineffective because covers such a small fraction
of market (automobiles in global carbon market). - Not cost-beneficial if already have energy taxes.
5Economics of rebound effect
- Assume that regulation increases energy
efficiency of a capital good from mpg0 to mpg1
. The question is whether the lower cost of a vmt
(vehicle-mile traveled) would offset the lower
cost. - Here is the basic economics
-
6Economics of rebound effect
- Basic results from many demand studies
- Short-run gasoline price-elasticity on vmt
-0.1 (0.06) - Long-run gasoline price-elasticity on vmt
-0.29 (0.29) - Therefore, the rebound would be 10 to 29 percent
of mpg improvement. - This can be applied to other areas as well.
- Reference Phil Goodwin, Joyce Dargay And Mark
Hanly, Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel
Consumption with Respect to Price and Income A
Review, Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 3,
275292, May 2004, available at
http//www2.cege.ucl.ac.uk/cts/tsu/papers/transpre
v243.pdf
7Discounting Issues
- A common concern is that private-sector decision
makers use discount rates that are higher than
social discount rate. - Each of these issues has a different policy
implication - Taxation capital taxes lead to wedge between
social and private. - Social underinvestment leads to overall rate of
return lower than social marginal utility - Behavior stuff People cant count
- Capital market imperfections Liquidity
constraints mean that the cost of capital to
individuals is above-market because of borrowing
constraints, bankruptcy, - Risk/CCAPM Investment has high correlation with
total output (or more properly the MU of
consumption)
8Optimal tariff argument on oil taxes
- Basic argument. The point is that the US has
market power in the world oil market. By levying
tariffs, we can change the terms of trade (oil
prices) in our favor. - Regulation and taxes are a substitute for the
optimum tariff. - Example
- world supply curve to US Q Bp? , ?gt0
- US cost of imported oil V pQ B-1Q(11/ ?) ,
k an irrelevant constant - marginal cost of imported oil V(Q) (11/?)
B-1Q1/ ? p (11/ ?) - So optimal tariff is ad valorem
- t 1/ ? inverse elasticity of supply of
imports - Reference D. R. Bohi and W. D. Montgomery,
Social Cost of Imported Oil and UU Import
Policy, Annual Review of Energy, 1982, 7, 37-60. -
9Supply of oil imports into the US
For numerical assumptions, see next slide.
10Numerical example for US
11Optimal tariff argument on oil taxes
- t 1/ ? inverse supply elasticity.
- Complications Formula actually is
-
- Some notes
- Supply elasticity depends critically on whether
oil market is at full capacity (2007 v. 2009).
Very inelastic in full capacity short run quite
elastic when OPEC adjusts supply. (See next
slide.) - The optimal tariff in terms depends upon the
initial price because it is an ad valorem tariff. - The externality is a global externality for
consuming countries because it is a globalized
market. - Note this is a pecuniary, not a technological
externality. So it is a zero-sum (or slightly
negative-sum) game for the world. This has
serious strategic implications and suggest that
the diplomacy of the oil-price externality is
completely different from true global public
goods like global warming. - le
12Price
Short-run production capacity
Production