How to Publish in SCIENCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

How to Publish in SCIENCE

Description:

Content from a variety of sources. Content usually - but ... Should you enquire before? (' presub inquiry') Submit the manuscript. Through Science's web site ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: scie69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to Publish in SCIENCE


1
Publishing in Science Outliers, Closers,
Leaders
Pamela J. Hines, Ph.D.Senior Editor SCIENCE,
AAAS Washington DC
2
  • WHO publishes in and reads Science
  • WHERE are authors and readers
  • WHAT to publish in Science
  • WHEN is the research ready
  • HOW to publish in Science
  • WHY is it worth the effort

3
Content from a variety of sources
WHO publishes in and reads Science
  • Content usually - but not always - invited by
    the editors
  • Perspectives
  • Review Articles
  • Special Issues
  • Editorials
  • Book reviews
  • Content welcome
  • - from anyone, anywhere, of any age,
    without any previous agreement
  • Research papers
  • Research Articles
  • Reports
  • Brevia
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Technical Comments
  • Content usually written by staff
  • The news pages
  • .

4
Professional sectors Readers All AAAS members
get Science
WHERE are authors and readers
  • Academia
  • Non-profit
  • Industry
  • Teaching
  • Policy

Crossover rate 42 of non-industry readers are
nonetheless involved with industry
5
Geographical locations Readers All AAAS
members get Science
WHERE are authors and readers
20 non-US
Of non-US subscribers, 50 in Europe
6
Research papers are submitted from all around
the worldAuthors need not be subscribers or AAAS
members
WHERE are authors and readers
7
Research papers are published in all topics
WHAT to publish in Science
8
What helps
WHAT to publish in Science
  • Work that represents a large step forward
  • Solution to long-standing problem
  • Broad implications
  • Overturns conventional wisdom
  • Clear presentation
  • Interesting to specialists
  • Accessible to non-specialists
  • Optimizes the use of Science formats

9
What doesnt matter
WHAT to publish in Science
  • The eminence of the authors
  • The age of the authors
  • The prestige of the institution
  • Whether you contacted Science before submitting
  • Whether you are from the USA
  • Whether you are a member of AAAS
  • The field of inquiry

10
What hurts
WHAT to publish in Science
  • The LPU
  • Excessive or unfounded speculation
  • Repeat examples of a known phenomenon
  • Insufficient advance over previously published
    work

Common reasons for manuscript rejection
  • Topic is not of broad interest
  • Result is too small of an advance
  • Conclusions are not convincing
  • Interpretations are poorly supported
  • Insufficient mechanistic insight
  • Insufficient evidence of relevance

11
Papers in Science are or are not like other
papers in Science?
WHAT to publish in Science
  • Features of papers that might be similar
  • Importance
  • Impact
  • Clarity
  • Language
  • Text length
  • Format
  • Supplements exist
  • Features of papers that might be different
  • Topic
  • Technology
  • Methods
  • Domain
  • Authors
  • Locations
  • Country
  • Research sites

12
Common reasons for acceptance
WHEN is the research ready
  • How to define quality?
  • Science looks for
  • Outliers
  • Closers
  • Leaders
  • Important question
  • Interesting or unexpected answer
  • Great science!

13
Think like reviewers and editors
HOW to publish in Science
  • The importance
  • If the interpretation is correct, would this
    paper be interesting enough?
  • The data
  • Robust data?
  • Appropriate controls?
  • Original approach?
  • The presentation
  • Well written text?
  • Well organized argumentation?
  • Thoughtful discussion?
  • Formats suitable for the journal (length,
    figures, references, sections) ?

14
Learning the Ropes of Peer Reviewing
by E. Pain, in Science
Careers web site, August 15, 2008
HOW to publish in Science
  • Assess scientific rigor, significance, relevance,
    originality
  • Confirm that you -
  • Have the relevant technical knowledge
  • Can meet the time limit
  • Are free from conflicts of interest
  • Support your opinions with evidence and clear
    arguments
  • Offer advice for improvement
  • Clarify which improvements are necessary, and
    which are optional
  • Be kind and gracious to the author

15
What Editors Wantby L. Worsham, in the
Chronicle of Higher Education, Sept. 8, 2008
HOW to publish in Science
  • Only submit work appropriate for that journal.
  • Replicate the style and tone of work from that
    journal in your own article.
  • Follow the journals style guide and submission
    rules.
  • Submit content free of errors.
  • Place your work in the context of articles in the
    field.
  • Accept rejection Competition is fierce, so
    maintain a positive attitude.

L. Worsham is a professor of English.
16
Submitting a manuscript to Science
HOW to publish in Science
  • Should you enquire before? (presub inquiry)
  • Submit the manuscript
  • Through Sciences web site
  • Instructions to Authors, length limits, SOM
  • If manuscript is rejected, should you appeal?
  • If manuscript is viewed favorably, should you
    revise?

17
HOW to publish in Science
Over 200 manuscripts submitted each week
What happens to your manuscript?
Editorial and BoRE analysis
25
75
Advice from reviewers
Editorial analysis, revisions, re-review,
editing
7
93
Manuscript rejected
Publication in Science
18
About Science and AAAS
WHY is it worth the effort?
  • AAAS, founded in 1848 in Philadelphia with about
    400 initial members.
  • AAAS American Association for the Advancement of
    Science
  • Science, founded in 1880 by Thomas Edison, became
    the official journal of AAAS in 1900.
  • Science retains editorial independence.
  • AAAS is a non-profit organization (www.aaas.org).
  • AAAS goals are to advance science and serve
    society through initiatives in
  • science policy
  • international programs
  • science education

19
WHY is it worth the effort?
The rejection rate is tough
3
4
18
75
20
WHY is it worth the effort?
But the visibility is great
  • Science is in over 1400 libraries and
    universities around the world
  • Site licenses make the journal broadly available
    online
  • Over a hundred thousand individuals have personal
    subscriptions
  • And they usually pass their copy on to on average
    7 other people
  • Total readership, print plus on-line,
  • 1 million people every week
  • Rapid targeted international growth
  • About 28,000 subscriptions outside the US
  • Subscriptions doubled in the past ten years
  • Fastest growth in Asia and South America

21
WHY is it worth the effort?
Access to Science papers
  • Original research is freely available with
    registration 1 year after publication
  • Self-archiving If an authors grant agency or
    institution requires deposition after 6 months in
    a public repository (such as PubMedCentral) the
    accepted version can be posted with a link to the
    final version of the paper in Science
  • Authors can link to the final version from their
    website for free access

22
WHAT to publish in Science et al.
  • The Science family includes
  • Science Signaling
  • Science Translational Medicine
  • Science Careers

New
23
The editors at Science
24
The American Association for the Advancement of
Science
  • Future meetings
  • Washington, D.C. 17-21 February 2011
  • Vancouver, Canada 16-20 February 2012
  • Boston, MA 14-18 February 2013

AAAS seeks to advance science and innovation
throughout the world for the benefit of all
people.
http//www.aaas.org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com