Strong Schools Strong Communities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Strong Schools Strong Communities

Description:

Area District State Nation. Math 58 52 49. Critical Reading 54 51 48. Writing 51 48 46 ... (average in St. Cloud area) The Cost Of Excellence. All questions: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: patwe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strong Schools Strong Communities


1
Strong Schools
Strong Communities
2008 District 742 Operation Levy For Excellence
and Accountability
2
  • A strength of our communities rests on the
    foundation of excellent and accountable schools

3
Excellent and Accountable Schools Are Essential
for
  • A well-educated community workforce
  • Strong per capita income
  • Sustained local economic growth
  • Community attractiveness, prosperity and property
    value
  • A legacy for our children
  • A democratic society
  • Center for International Competitiveness Robert
    Huggins Associates
  • State Competitiveness Report Beacon Hill
    Institute

4
Indicators of Excellence in 742 Creating
Our Future Citizens and Workforce
  • Advanced Placement Test Scores 70 of students
    who tested receive college credit (earned a 3 or
    better on a scale of 5). State average 65.
    2006-2007
  • ACT Scores Average student score was higher than
    the State average 06-07 (Mn remains first in the
    nation for ACT scores)

5
Indicators of Excellencein 742Creating Our
Future Citizens and Workforce
  • PSAT Test (the most academically challenging high
    school test) scores were substantially higher
    than state and national scores 2006-2007
  • Area District State Nation
  • Math 58 52 49
  • Critical Reading 54 51 48
  • Writing 51 48 46
  • Graduation Rates Met or exceeded State target
    rates including an outstanding 97.76 of student
    living in poverty (2006 data)

6
Indicators of Excellent and AccountableManagement
in 742
  • District and school administration only 3.9 of
    total expenditure budget average cost per
    student is 21 lower than state average
  • Avoidance of 1.2 million in energy costs since
    2004 implemented Schools for Energy Efficiency
  • External efficiency studies in Special Ed,
    Business Services and Human Resources resulted
    in more efficient and cost saving operations

7
Indicators of Excellent and Accountable
Management in 742
  • Re-organization of Transportation Services
    estimated savings of 495,000-540,000
  • Revenue enhancements through grants received
    Improving Access for All 2.2 million/two years
    Integration Plan for Equity Services 1.2
    million/year
  • Accountability and transparency for 2003 Levy
    (fund balance, 35 teachers, transportation,
    student activities/fine arts)

8
Economic Realities Straight Talk
  • Underfunded State and Federal mandates i.e.
    Special Education estimated 625/student for
    2008-09
  • 88 (306 out of 340) of districts to levy
    additional property taxes at a State average of
    696/student (2008-2009)
  • 2003 expired levy and 1998 levy set to expire at
    a loss of 551/student to 742 resulting in
    decreased revenues for our students

9
Demographic Realities Straight Talk
  • Centralization of high needs students in regional
    centers like St. Cloud
  • English Language Learners (10)
  • 41 Languages. (State 8)
  • Special Education (18 )
  • (State 13)
  • Free/Reduced Lunch (41)
  • (State 32)
  • Some students factor in more than one category

10
Comparison District Demographics
11
Realities Inequities in levy funding to
traditional comparison districts/by
size and state average 2008-2009

Districts Shown are Commonly Used for Comparison
with ISD 742 Based on Enrollment, Budget and
Other Factors
12
Realities
  • Compared to similar sized districts, 742 is
  • 9th out of 10 in regular instruction
    expenditures
  • 7th out of 10 in student activities/athletic
    expenditures
  • 9th out of 10 in expenditures for District
    Administrators
  • 7th out of 10 in expenditures for School Level
    Administrators
  • 9th out of 10 in operations/maintenance
    expenditures

13
Regional Demographics
14
Realities (regional graph)
15
Realities
  • Compared to regional districts, 742 is
  • 7th (tied) out of 9 in regular instruction
  • expenditures
  • 8th out of 9 in student activities/athletic
  • expenditures
  • 7th out of 9 in expenditures for district
  • administration
  • 7th out of 9 in expenditures for school
  • administration
  • 9th out of 9 in operations/maintenance
  • expenditures

16
Impact to School and Community
  • 2002-2004 10.8 million in cuts
  • Increase in class ratios
  • Cuts in activities
  • Cuts in programs, services, and district
    infrastructure including
  • gifted talented, student
    assistance, instructional
  • materials, curriculum development, staff
    training, special education,
    teacher leaders, district planning,
    assessment, media specialists,
    transportation, custodians, food
    service, clerical personnel.
  • Cuts in administration
  • Cuts in parent involvement/ community relations
  • Increased fees

17
Impact to School and Community
  • 2005 2008 7.9 Million in cuts
  • Cuts in assessment, gifted programming,
  • curriculum and instruction
  • Cuts in parent communication
  • Cuts in alternative programming for
    troubled students
  • Cuts in physical education (pools)
  • Cuts in transportation, safety, and security
  • Positions
  • Cuts in activities administration
  • Cuts in regular education administration
  • Cuts in business services personnel
  • Cuts in special education

18
Impact to School and Community
  • 2008-2009
  • 1.5 million in cuts because of failure to renew
    expired 2003 levy
  • Curriculum/instruction
  • Transportation to 2 miles
  • Extra-curricular activities
  • Business Services and Special
  • Education
  • Media
  • Increase in rental fees
  • 2.2 million spent from the districts fund
    balance
  • as a one-time expenditure due to the failure
    to
  • renew the expired 2003 levy

19
Impact to School and Community
  • 2009 2010 Failed levy will result
    in
  • 4.3 Million in additional cuts
  • Potential Reductions
  • Close two buildings
  • Cut up to 55 teachers
  • Cut junior high activities
  • Cut clerical staff and paraprofessionals
  • Cut administration
  • Cut special education
  • Cut secondary supervisors/monitors

20
Excellent and Accountable Schools Commit To
  • 1. Provide high quality teaching for all
    students and set
  • measurable improvement standards to challenge
    each student to excellence
  • 2. Measure student progress regularly to guide
    teaching and report to parents and
    community
  • 3. Provide high quality programs, instructional
    materials and activities to increase
    student participation and success for
    graduation
  • 4. Expect students to come prepared to school
    and hold families and the community
    accountable to support students
  • 5.Continue to improve financial efficiencies and
    transparency

21
Question 1 Approval of Revenue Increase for
Teachers, Activities, Transportation and
Operations
  • This will avoid 4.3 million in cuts in 2008-09
    and allow the district to
  • Maintain class size
  • Increase the fund balance
  • Maintain operations (energy, fuel, supplies,
    safety security, and general operating
    expenses)
  • Maintain extra-curricular activities
  • Restore 1 mile transportation limit
  • 555/student for 6 years.

22
Question 2 Approval of Revenue Increase for
Funding Equal to Minnesota Average
  • Increase music in the curriculum
  • Enhance extra-curricular activities
  • Maintain elementary counselors
  • Expand early childhood education opportunities
  • Provide gifted and talented instruction
  • 160/student for 6 years

23
Question 3 Approval of Revenue Increase for
Additional Student Curriculum and Services
  • Provide All Day Every Day Kindergarten for all 5
    year olds
  • Provide full-time library/media specialist in
    every school
  • Provide instructional materials
  • Upgrade science and math programs for elementary
    students
  • 255/student for 6 years

24
The Cost Of Excellence
  • Question 1 555/student
  • Home Value Increased Cost
    Year Month Day
  • 100,000 73.03 6.08 .20
  • 182,326 133.16 11.09 .36
  • 250,000 182.59 15.21 .50

(2008 Market Value)
(average in St. Cloud area)
25
The Cost Of Excellence
  • Question 2 160 per student
  • Home Value Increased Cost
    Year Month Day
  • 100,000 25.73 2.14 .07
  • 182,326 46.92 3.91 .12
  • 250,000 64.33 5.36 .17

(2008 Market Value)
(average in St. Cloud area)
26
The Cost Of Excellence
  • Question 3 255 per student
  • Home Value Increased Cost
    Year Month Day
  • 100,000 41.01 3.41 .11
  • 182,326 74.77 6.23 .20
  • 250,000 102.53 8.54 .28

(2008 Market Value)
(average in St. Cloud area)
27
The Cost Of Excellence
  • All questions 970/student
  • Home Value Increased Cost
    Year Month Day
  • 100,000 139.77 11.64 .38
  • 182,326 254.85 21.23
    .69
  • 250,000 349.45 29.12
    .95

(2008 Market Value)
(average in St. Cloud area)
28
  • Respond on the Districts web site
    www.isd742.org
  • You 2 Discuss the referendum with two other
    people
  • Vote on November 4

Vote
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com