Using delay lines on a test station for the Muon Chambers PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 28
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using delay lines on a test station for the Muon Chambers


1
Using delay lines on a test station for the Muon
Chambers
  • Design considerations
  • (A. F. Barbosa, Jul/2003)

2
Outline
  • Simple model for the signal time development
  • The delay line method
  • Application to the muon chamber
  • Simulation results
  • Outlook

3
Simple electrostatic model
  • In the neighborhood of a wire in a MWPC, the
    electrostatic field is not very different from
    the co-axial cable case
  • This is particularly true if s is comparable to
    d and both gtgt wire radius

4
The cylindrical geometry(co-axial cable)
  • The electrostatic field for a wire centered
    inside a cylindrical surface is well known

C capacitance per unit length b cylinder
radius a wire radius r radial distance
a lt r lt b
5
Particle detection and signal development
  • Particles interacting with the dielectric (gas
    molecules) generate ion pairs (e- and ion)
    inside the detector volume
  • The charged particles released in the
    interactions drift to the corresponding
    electrodes
  • Close to the wire surface, the electric field is
    high enough to accelerate electrons and produce
    avalanche amplification
  • We assume that the avalanche charge is
    point-like in order to derive an analytical
    signal shape

6
The electric signal
  • Energy conservation allows us to obtain the
    analytical expression

7
Signal amplitude
  • In the co-axial cable case, EE(r)
    (one-dimensional problem)
  • Using the field expressions, we may compute

ro 15 ?m a 10 ?m b 1 cm
?
u(-q) 0.062 u(q)
8
Signal shape (in time)
  • Electrons contribution is negligible
  • For the positive ions, we may assume
  • Using the expression for E(r) we find

9
Equivalent circuit
  • The detector signal is read necessarily by an
    electronic circuit
  • The equivalent circuit may be seen as a voltage
    differentiator or charge integrator

10
Output signal
  • For the Thevenin equivalent circuit, the transfer
    function is
  • From this we may compute
  • I(t) is the current passing through the detector
    capacitor

11
The analytical signal shape (RC effect)
12
The true signal
  • The avalanche may be considered point-like to a
    good approximation.
  • However, an ionizing particle crossing the
    detector leaves charge clusters along its track
  • E.g. one M.I.P., in 1cm of Ar/C02 ? around 40
    clusters (? 2 e-/cluster) ? in one gap (5 mm)
    we may expect around 40 primary particles, in a
    rather complex time distribution
  • The ion mobility (?) is not really constant
  • Geometry (mechanical precision) affects the
    avalanche gain
  • ()

Finally, the time space resolution is finite
(measured ?t ? 3-4 ns)
13
The Delay Line Method
  • One delay line cell is an L-C circuit which
    introduces an almost constant delay to signal
    propagation

14
Discrete delay lines
  • Delay line cells may be implemented in cascade,
    so that one may associate spatial position with a
    time measurement
  • The L-C values are chosen according to the
    application (bandwidth, noise, count rate, time
    resolution )

15
Application to the Muon Chamber
  • The pad capacitance to ground imposes a minimum
    value for C
  • The chamber intrinsic time resolution is ? 4ns
    (?)
  • In order to clearly identify a pad (separate it
    from its neighbor) from a time measurement, the
    time delay between pads should be gt 5?
  • The delay line impedance should be as high as
    possible (in order to have the signal amplitude
    well above noise)
  • The band-width has to be large, because very fast
    signals are foreseen

M2R2 pad-ground capacitance values (pF)
? The chamber capacitance has to be part of the
delay line
16
Preliminary Design
  • The following basic circuit could cope with the
    requirements
  • L 1.6 ?H
  • C 40 pF
  • 8ns
  • ?o 250 MHz
  • Z 200 ?
  • We start studying it as if the capacitances were
    all the same, then we compare it with the real
    design, which incorporates pad capacitances as
    part of the circuit
  • L 1.6 ?H
  • C 40 6.5pF
  • 8 0.64 ns
  • ?o 250 19 MHz
  • Z 200 16?

17
Simulations
  • We assume the detector capacitance (anode to
    cathode) to be 100pF
  • SPICE is used to simulate signal propagation
    through the delay line
  • The signal u(t) after traversing the whole delay
    line is

18
Linearity
  • One event is input at each pad, we expect to have
    a linearly varying time measurement

19
Linearity Quality (an example)
  • The simulated non-linearity is best than what
    could be expected from a simple model for jitter
    error
  • The delay line method actually is known to
    feature excellent non linearity performance

20
Signal Distortion along the line
  • Due to the reflection and attenuation of high
    frequencies (? gtgt ?o), the signal is broadened
    and distorted as it travels through the circuit

21
Effect of the pad capacitances
  • The pad capacitances are introduced in the
    circuit, so we may evaluate the performance

22
Linearity results
  • The errors in pad position measurement are lt cell
    delay (?)

23
Pre-amplifier
  • A voltage pre-amplifier must be implemented as
    close as possible to the detector delay line,
    in order to avoid cable capacity losses and
    distortions
  • The pre-amplifier circuit bandwidth must be
    matched to the delay line output signal spectral
    composition, so that the delay line performance
    is preserved
  • The following circuit is proposed (it has been
    separately simulated before coupling to the delay
    line circuit)

24
Overall performance (pads delay line
pre-amplifier)
  • The introduction of the pre-amplifier stage does
    not bring critical distortions to the signal shape

25
Crosstalk(what happens if the induced charge is
split between two pads?)
  • The charge fraction as a function of pad distance
    has been taken from Ref. LHCb 2000-060 (W.
    Riegler)

26
Noise considerations
  • The delay line resistive termination is a source
    of thermal noise at the pre-amplifier input

k 1.38 x 10-23 J/K T temperature 300 R
200 ? B pre-amp. band width ? 106 ?
Vth ? 1?V, Ith lt 10 nA
  • EMI pickup is also an issue delay line
    pre-amp. must be housed in a Faraday cage.
  • More detailed noise study may be envisaged.

27
Outlook
  • The remaining parts of the readout scheme are
    amplifier discriminator TDC PC interface
    software
  • The main components are commercially available
    ICs which have already been tested
  • A customized solution for TDC PC Interface
    software is presently being done
  • Most of the parts and components has been ordered
  • Local support is required

28
Conclusions
  • The fundamental aspects of the delay line
    technique applied to the identification of pads
    in the muon wire chamber have been presented
  • The simulation results show that the method is
    effective to identify the pad position for
    detected events, with reasonably good time
    resolution
  • Using this method, the chambers may be
    characterized with cosmic rays, as it represents
    a source of homogeneous radiation
  • () The complete test station should also include
    the measurement of pulse height spectra from the
    anode wire planes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com