Simulation of Self-Assembly of Ampiphiles Using Molecular Dynamics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Simulation of Self-Assembly of Ampiphiles Using Molecular Dynamics

Description:

Used molecules with completely flexible tails (ht4) and semi-rigid tails (HT4) ... Conjugate gradient converged much more slowly for HT4. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mistyd3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Simulation of Self-Assembly of Ampiphiles Using Molecular Dynamics


1
Simulation of Self-Assembly of Ampiphiles Using
Molecular Dynamics
  • Reza Banki, Misty Davies, Haneesh Kesari
  • Final Project Presentation ME346
  • Stanford University

2
Overview
  • Introduction and Background
  • Methodology
  • Bead Spring Model
  • Potential Models
  • Implementation
  • Results
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
Introduction
  • Ampiphiles--large molecule with one or more
    hydrophilic head groups and hydrophobic tail
    groups
  • Lipids, fat molecules which create cell
    membranes and micelles, do so because they are
    ampiphiles

Images from Nielsen and Klein
4
Motivation
  • Cell membranes are composed of lipids
  • Drug delivery
  • Protobiological evolution
  • Nanomechanical Synthesis by Self-Assembly

library.thinkquest.org/.../cell_membranes.html
mrsec.uchicago.edu/Nuggets/Nanostructures/
5
Bead and Spring Model
  • Replace hydrophilic head groups with one kind
    of bead and hydrophobic tail groups with
    another kind of bead. Water as a third kind of
    bead.
  • Model bond interactions within the lipid as
    springs

Top image from Nielsen and Klein Bottom image
www.ahd.tudelft.nl/frank/showcase.html
6
Potential Models LJ 6-12
  • Used for all unbonded non-hydrophobic reactions
  • h?h
  • t?t
  • w?w
  • h?w

www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/models.html
7
Potential Models LJ 9
  • Used for all unbonded hydrophobic (purely
    repulsive) reactions
  • h?t
  • t?w

8
Potential Models Bond
Top image www.ahd.tudelft.nl/frank/showcase.html
Bottom image from Goetz and Lipowsky
Stretching and bending energies in the bonds
(modeled as springs)
9
Implementation makelipids
  • Created as a function within MD
  • Allows for creation of lipids with multiple
    heads, multiple number of beads per tail, and
    allows you to specify which heads are connected
    to tails
  • Each lipid is randomly placed, and then water
    molecules are created based on specified density
    and concentration.
  • System is relaxed using CG method to begin
    simulation at equilibrium

10
Implementation Connectivity
6
  • Each bead is assigned an index corresponding to a
    row in an array that lists neighbor beads that it
    is connected to. The columns of the array
    identify the structure and the bead type.
  • Also identifies which lipid each bead belongs to.
    This allows the entire molecule to be moved
    across a periodic boundary for visualization.

5
7
0
8
1
9
2
10
3
4
11
Implementation lennard_jones_bond
  • Created as a function within MD
  • Calculates bond and bending energies for bonded
    particles (LJ potentials for bonded particles are
    neglected.)
  • Calculates appropriate LJ potential energy for
    unbonded particles.
  • Calculates and sums forces between particles
    within the cutoff radius (used same cutoff radius
    for all particles). Uses neighbor list
    implementation within MD

12
Results Current Model
  • Used molecules with completely flexible tails
    (ht4) and semi-rigid tails (HT4)
  • ?0.006 particles/Å3
  • Cs0.069, 0.208, 0.347, 0.417
  • LxLy40Å, Lz50Å
  • ?t0.001ps, total simulation time100ps
  • ?03.321e-24 kJ
  • ?3.33 Å, ?rep1.05 ?
  • rc2.5 ?
  • kbond5000 ?0 /sqrt(?), kbend50 ?0

13
Results Conjugate Gradient
  • Conjugate gradient failed more often for higher
    densities. Current model approximately 1/3 the
    density of the desired model.
  • Conjugate gradient converged much more slowly for
    HT4.
  • Much faster simulation times than those reported
    in previous simulations may be due to conjugate
    gradient creating excellent initial conditions.

14
Results 0.069 Concentration
ht4
HT4
15
Results 0.208 Concentration
ht4
HT4
16
Results 0.347 Concentration
ht4
HT4
17
Results 0.417 Concentration
ht4
HT4
18
Conclusions
  • Using very simple models for the molecular
    structures and for the potential interactions it
    is possible to simulate lipid self-assembly
  • More complicated structures are formed with
    higher lipid concentration
  • Bending potentials assist aggregate formation
  • Relaxation may speed total simulation times
  • CG Relaxation may not be suitable for high
    density simulations

19
Suggestions for Future Work
  • Implement bending energies in bonds between heads
  • Implement a function that allows for more than
    one kind of lipid
  • Model the different masses of each
    particle--instead of using the average
  • Implement a detection algorithm to determine the
    time of self-assembly and to place the center of
    mass of the structure at the center of the
    simulation cell for visualization
  • Implement a DPD model so that water molecules do
    not have to be simulated--this may allow CG to
    relax higher density simulations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com