Freedom of Speech and Control of Information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Freedom of Speech and Control of Information

Description:

Freedom of Information and alternative channels of ... Knowledge of speaker identity - better assessment of truthfulness or accuracy of the expression ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: karinebarz
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Freedom of Speech and Control of Information


1
Freedom of Speech and Control of Information
  • Karine Barzilai-Nahon
  • karineb_at_u.washington.edu

2
Basics of Democracies
  • Free elections and peaceful regime transition
  • High level of freedoms, for example
  • Freedom of association
  • Freedom of expression
  • Freedom of Information and alternative channels
    of information
  • Privacy
  • Minority rights and marginal groups
  • Existence of a legitimate opposition

3
Basic Definitions
  • Free speech the right to inform and to know
  • Positive freedom promoting speech
  • Negative freedom constraining
  • Restrictions of freedom of speech
  • Restriction apriori (legislation, filtering,
    blocking, zoning)
  • Restriction posteriori (legislation, deletion)
  • 2003 - NTIA Report

4
Claims for Freedom of Speech
  • Important to the individual development of
    fulfillment
  • The autonomy to select beliefs and views
  • Self-determination of social groups
  • Promoting truth and its exposure
  • One component of democracy
  • Exposing social problems and adjustment to change

5
Censorship
  • Moral Censorship
  • Pornography
  • Extreme violence
  • Sedition to racism
  • Hurting the norms of the public
  • Security Censorship
  • State Censorship

6
Internet and Free Speech
  • Wide and low cost distribution
  • Speed of distribution
  • Empowered individuals?
  • Anonymity?
  • Diverse applications
  • Enforcement?

7
Anonymity (Informative Arguments)
  • Support Disclosure
  • Knowledge of speaker identity - better assessment
    of truthfulness or accuracy of the expression
  • Giving the right weight to the expression
  • Prevent impersonation
  • Support Anonymity
  • Knowledge of speaker identity misjudge veracity
    or the persuasive force of an argument.
  • Giving the wrong weight to the expression
  • Allows creativity of identities

8
Anonymity (Group Pressure Arguments)
  • Support Disclosure
  • Inhibit expressions that are undesired socially
    or harmful
  • Enhance accountability and responsibility for the
    expression
  • Support Anonymity
  • Allows and protects expressions that might be
    unconventional socially
  • Enhance revelation and responsibility for the
    expression less political

9
Anonymity (Enforcement Arguments)
  • Support Disclosure
  • An Address for enforcement
  • Preventing illegal activities in the future due
    to deterrence
  • Support Anonymity
  • Allow collaboration of felons with authorities
  • Encourages informing on activities of others

10
Censorship and Internet
  • Use of technology systems (filtering, blocking,
    zoning, deletion) as controlling information and
    speech
  • Manual censoring (deletion)
  • Use of channeling mechanisms
  • Use of infrastructure control (non-democratic
    regime)
  • Policy of deterrence (regulation or practices)
    CIPA, COPA, CDA
  • Policy of punishment (state and self regulation)

11
China and Controlling the net
  • Closing Internet Cafés
  • Filtering and blocking sites
  • Channeling search engines and portals
  • Regulation
  • Arrests and torture
  • Internet Police and collaboration with others
  • Licensing

12
Normative Models
  • Threat to democracy - Cass Sunstein
  • Architecture protection - Lessig
  • Threat to democratic culture - Jack Balkin
  • Network gatekeeping theory Barzilai-Nahon

13
Gatekeeping is Dead!
  • Lets begin with the unpleasant truth Were
    not gatekeepers any more.
  • Gatekeeping is a dead profession. There are no
    gates to be kept. The city walls have been torn
    down.
  • We dont control information. Control was, at
    best, an illusion, and now, in the era of Matt
    Drudge, even that illusion is shattered. We dont
    own our customers. They own themselves. They will
    go where they want. Theyll do what they want.
  • (Steve Yelvington, Executive Editor of Cox
    Interactive Media)

14
What is Gatekeeping?
  • Classical Gatekeeping Theories
  • Kurt Lewin (1947)
  • David Manning White (1950) Mr. Gates
  • Gieber (1956), Bass (1969), Shoemaker (1991)
  • Simply put, gatekeeping is the process by
    which the billions of messages that are available
    in the world get cut down and transformed into
    the hundreds of messages that reach a given
    person on a given day (Shoemaker, 1991)

15
Gatekeepers in a Networked Environment
  • Gatekeeping Process of controlling information
    as it moves through a gate. Activities include
    selection, addition, withholding, display,
    channeling, shaping, manipulation, repetition,
    timing, localization, integration, disregard and
    deletion of information.
  • Gatekeeping Mechanism Tool or technology used
    to carry out the process of gatekeeping.
  • Network Gatekeeper Entity (people,
    organizations, or governments) that has the
    discretion to exercise gatekeeping through a
    gatekeeping mechanism in networks and can choose
    the extent to which to exercise it.

16
Typology of Gatekeepers
17
Typology of Gatekeeping Mechanisms
18
Typology of Gatekeeping Mechanisms
19
Comparing Frameworks
20
Gatekeeping in Virtual Communities
21
Example of Explanatory Model
  • Z - 6.876 4.235(MsgDay3)
    4.299(MsgDay4) 4.437(MsgDay5)
    4.265(MsgDay6) 4.074(MsgDay7)-1.087(MsgDay
    8) 4.393(MsgDay9) 4.17(MsgDay10)
    4.161(MsgDay11) 4.329(MsgDay12)
    4.198(MsgDay13) 4.261(MsgDay14)
    0.996(MsgDay15) 4.663(MsgDay16)
    4.36(MsgDay17) 4.104(MsgDay18)
    4.139(MsgDay19) 4.148(MsgDay20)
    4.155(MsgDay21) -0.829(MsgDay22)
    4.177(MsgDay23) 4.206(MsgDay24)
    4.285(MsgDay25) 4.409(MsgDay26)
    4.273(MsgDay27) 4.324(MsgDay28)
    1.21(MsgDay29) 4.493(MsgDay30)
    4.532(MsgDay31) 0.254(MsgHour 2)
    0.172(MsgHour4) 0.336(MsgHour9)
    0.125(MsgHour10) 0.3(MsgHour11)
    0.377(MsgHour12) 0.09(MsgHour20)
    5.713(MsgDayofWeek3) 0.6MsgSubLength(---1
    0.193MsgSubLength(1---3 -0.242MsgSubLength
    (3---4 1.001 MsgContentLength(34---37
    2.425MsgSubLength(37--- 0.714(ForumPrimaryC
    ategoryPlacement Love and romanticism
    Acquaintance) 0.52( ForumPrimaryCategoryPlaceme
    ntLove and romanticism For Adults) 0.715(
    ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacementPeople and Society)
    0.233(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacementPride)
    1.494(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacementThe economy
    and Business) 0.495(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlaceme
    nt Music) 0.47(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement
    Computers and Internet) 0.702(ForumPrimaryCateg
    oryPlacementThe family) 0.881(ForumPrimaryCate
    goryPlacement The family Duality)
    0.342(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement Sports)
    0.603(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement Sports
    fans) 0.793(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement
    Current events parties) 0.709(ForumPrimaryCat
    egoryPlacement Leisure and entertainment TV)
    0.351(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement Leisure
    and entertainment hobbies)
    0.551(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement Young)
    0.586(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement
    Spirituality and mysticism) 0.601(ForumPrimary
    CategoryPlacement Medicine and health)
    0.894(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement Support)
    0.611(ForumPrimaryCategoryPlacement
    Locality) -0.412(UserGenderCheated)
    0.733(UserGenderMale) 0.982(UserGenderFemale
    ) 0.083JuneUserDelMsgs(0---7
    0.0006JuneUserDelMsgs(7---
    0.256JuneUserNoForums(0---2
    0.62NormalUserSeniorityInForum(0.05---0.19
    0.948NormalUserSeniorityInForum(0.19---0.416
    1.245NormalUserSeniorityInForum(0.416---0.76
    1.353NormalUserSeniorityInForum(0.76---
    19.534NormalUserDelMsgsUntilJune(0---0.032.
    84NormalUserDelMsgsUntilJune(0.03---0.15

22
GAINS Chart of the Model
23
The Gatekeepers The Duality of Hurting and
Guarding the Wall in virtual communities- A
mixed model of regulation
24
Self-Regulation Gatekeeping
  • Sovereignty Inside Borders of Virtual Communities
  • Governments must rely on self-regulation
    mechanisms
  • self-regulation mechanism can be
  • Censorship mechanisms (blocking messages users,
    deleting, zoning)
  • Channeling mechanisms (hyperlinks, ranking)
  • Editorial mechanisms

25
Sovereignty Inside Borders of Virtual Communities
(cont.)
  • Tension between the enablers and managers.
  • Managers are 4 timed more likely to post
    commercial information (usually upon request of
    the enablers), but are 7 times less likely to
    post information that may harm the community (ex.
    moving to another space).
  • Quality vs. popularity.

26
Social Capital in Virtual Communities
  • The Community Core
  • User seniority More senior, less hurts the
    community, less blocked (except when the reason
    is irrelevant), contributes more to balance the
    regular activities serve as the gatekeepers!!!
  • Overlapping Loyalties
  • Marginalized Communities strong sense of
    homogeneity and social capital. Censoring the
    non main-stream.

27
Anonyimity of a Gated
  • User history or profile?
  • Guests
  • Gender

28
Mr. Gates
c
29
The Physics of the Web
c
(Barabasi, 2001)
30
Direct and Indirect Navigation
Source (WebSideStory, 2003a)
c
31
Search Engines Referrals
Table 3.9 Search Engine Referrals1
4.1
c
32
Interesting Links
  • Internet Under Surveillance Report Reporters
    without borders May 2006
  • Report on Censorship and Control- September 2003
    Privacy International
  • Amnesty Report state control of China in the
    Internet
  • Human Rights Watch and the Internet

33
(No Transcript)
34
Everybody writes
35
But Who Reads?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com