Analysis Of Polymer Flow In Extrusion Dies For Scintillator PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis Of Polymer Flow In Extrusion Dies For Scintillator


1
Comparison of One-Hole Die Shape
Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator and
Detector Development (NICADD)
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)
By Dr. Meung Kim Prasad Rayasam
Department of Mechanical Engineering Northern
Illinois University
2
Contents
  1. Objective Dimensions of Extrudate
  2. Inverse Analysis with Remeshing
  3. Mesh Refinement Study
  4. Calibrator
  5. Material Parameters

3
Objective Dimensions of the Extrudate
Units CM
Desired Dimensions of the Extrudate
4
Inverse Analysis with Remeshing
  • According to PolyFlow manual three sections must
    be modeled as
  • For the section to be maintained at a constant
    shape, constant section for prediction is
    selected instead of Adaptive section for
    prediction. POLFYLOW is to compute the shape
    (referred to as the adaptive section of the die),
    based on the specified extrudate shape.

5
Mesh Refinement Study
  • Mesh refinement in two different directions
    along the longitudinal direction and transverse
    direction.
  • The inlet of adaptive section is updated based on
    constant section obtained by inverse analysis.

Model Half Domain
No.of elements on this face 450
6
Mesh Refinement Half Domain
  • Max no.of elements is limited by memory
  • Much better ear shape is observed using more
    elements.
  • In all cases the initial adaptive section that
    was rectangular is modified similar to constant
    section after inverse analysis to get smooth
    transition.

7
Mesh Refinement Quarter Domain
Model Quarter domain (Final Result) with 1.5
inches of free surface
8
Comparison of Profiles
9
Sample Extrudate Experiment
(a)
(b)
Both profiles of the sample extrudates measured
by (a) our team and (b) the other team 1 are
much larger than objective size (2 x 1 cm) of
extrudate.
1 http//www.kostic.niu.edu/extrusion/scanned_ex
trusion_samples_11-13-03.pdf
10
Comparison of Desired and Simulated Extrudate by
Direct Extrusion
Case B in previous quarter domain simulation
11
Comparison Die Section Dimensions (mm)
Center Width Center Height Major Hole Dia. Minor Hole Dia.
Existing Die 20.312 9.54 1.22 1.22
Our Team 18.825 9.155 0.955 0.69
Other Team 20.004 9.788 1.054 0.77
Experimental 22.5 11.2 1.4 0.93
Our Simulated 19.97 9.956 0.99 0.992
Objective 20 10 1.1 1.1
12
Observations Discussion
  1. Existing Die gives Larger Dimensions of the
    Extrudate than Objective with Rounded Corners.
  2. For Desired Extrudate of 2 x 1 cm² with 90º
    Corners, it seems that the die must be smaller
    and needs to have ears as shown in our simulation.

13
Observations Discussion
  • The simulation is based on rigorous computational
    analysis.
  • Convergence analysis in x-y and z-directions was
    performed until converged result was obtained.
  • Consistent to standard extrusion analysis, three
    sections of transition, constant, and
    free-surface were used to make sure that the
    extrudate remains constant after the end of free
    surface.
  • A material function fits the experimental data
    for all temperatures.
  • Gravitational effect has been checked out to be
    negligible.
  • Though isothermal and non-isothermal simulations
    give closer results, non-isothermal simulations
    with temperature-dependent viscosity are carried
    out.
  • Improving adaptive section after inverse
    analysis.
  • Use long enough length of free surface to insure
    that the velocity remains constant.

14
Material Parameters - Styron 663add
Polymat is used to curve fit the viscosity
shear rate data using Carreau Yasuda law for
Styron 663add at three different temperatures
using Arrhenious Shear stress law.
Plot of polymer viscosity as a function of shear
rate and temperature
15
Material Parameters
Styron 663add Styron 663add
Zero-Shear Rate Viscosity 0.1471E5 0.603E4
Infinite Shear Rate Viscosity 0.433E-7 0.757E-3
Natural Time 0.5538 0.228
Slope 0.3263 0.3269
Transition Parameter 0.9419 0.946
alfa (temp) 17070 17038
Talfa (ref) 473 485
16
Face Mesh
17
Transition Region
18
Exploded view of Assembly
19
2-D Drawing for Top Die
20
2-D Drawing for Pin
21
Inlet Die Lip
Transition Lip
22
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com