Title: Analysis Of Polymer Flow In Extrusion Dies For Scintillator
1Comparison of One-Hole Die Shape
Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator and
Detector Development (NICADD)
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)
By Dr. Meung Kim Prasad Rayasam
Department of Mechanical Engineering Northern
Illinois University
2Contents
- Objective Dimensions of Extrudate
- Inverse Analysis with Remeshing
- Mesh Refinement Study
- Calibrator
- Material Parameters
3Objective Dimensions of the Extrudate
Units CM
Desired Dimensions of the Extrudate
4Inverse Analysis with Remeshing
- According to PolyFlow manual three sections must
be modeled as - For the section to be maintained at a constant
shape, constant section for prediction is
selected instead of Adaptive section for
prediction. POLFYLOW is to compute the shape
(referred to as the adaptive section of the die),
based on the specified extrudate shape.
5Mesh Refinement Study
- Mesh refinement in two different directions
along the longitudinal direction and transverse
direction. - The inlet of adaptive section is updated based on
constant section obtained by inverse analysis.
Model Half Domain
No.of elements on this face 450
6Mesh Refinement Half Domain
- Max no.of elements is limited by memory
- Much better ear shape is observed using more
elements. - In all cases the initial adaptive section that
was rectangular is modified similar to constant
section after inverse analysis to get smooth
transition.
7Mesh Refinement Quarter Domain
Model Quarter domain (Final Result) with 1.5
inches of free surface
8Comparison of Profiles
9Sample Extrudate Experiment
(a)
(b)
Both profiles of the sample extrudates measured
by (a) our team and (b) the other team 1 are
much larger than objective size (2 x 1 cm) of
extrudate.
1 http//www.kostic.niu.edu/extrusion/scanned_ex
trusion_samples_11-13-03.pdf
10Comparison of Desired and Simulated Extrudate by
Direct Extrusion
Case B in previous quarter domain simulation
11Comparison Die Section Dimensions (mm)
Center Width Center Height Major Hole Dia. Minor Hole Dia.
Existing Die 20.312 9.54 1.22 1.22
Our Team 18.825 9.155 0.955 0.69
Other Team 20.004 9.788 1.054 0.77
Experimental 22.5 11.2 1.4 0.93
Our Simulated 19.97 9.956 0.99 0.992
Objective 20 10 1.1 1.1
12Observations Discussion
- Existing Die gives Larger Dimensions of the
Extrudate than Objective with Rounded Corners. - For Desired Extrudate of 2 x 1 cm² with 90º
Corners, it seems that the die must be smaller
and needs to have ears as shown in our simulation.
13Observations Discussion
- The simulation is based on rigorous computational
analysis. - Convergence analysis in x-y and z-directions was
performed until converged result was obtained. - Consistent to standard extrusion analysis, three
sections of transition, constant, and
free-surface were used to make sure that the
extrudate remains constant after the end of free
surface. - A material function fits the experimental data
for all temperatures. - Gravitational effect has been checked out to be
negligible. - Though isothermal and non-isothermal simulations
give closer results, non-isothermal simulations
with temperature-dependent viscosity are carried
out. - Improving adaptive section after inverse
analysis. - Use long enough length of free surface to insure
that the velocity remains constant.
14Material Parameters - Styron 663add
Polymat is used to curve fit the viscosity
shear rate data using Carreau Yasuda law for
Styron 663add at three different temperatures
using Arrhenious Shear stress law.
Plot of polymer viscosity as a function of shear
rate and temperature
15Material Parameters
Styron 663add Styron 663add
Zero-Shear Rate Viscosity 0.1471E5 0.603E4
Infinite Shear Rate Viscosity 0.433E-7 0.757E-3
Natural Time 0.5538 0.228
Slope 0.3263 0.3269
Transition Parameter 0.9419 0.946
alfa (temp) 17070 17038
Talfa (ref) 473 485
16Face Mesh
17Transition Region
18Exploded view of Assembly
192-D Drawing for Top Die
202-D Drawing for Pin
21Inlet Die Lip
Transition Lip
22Thank You