Any allzero rows are at the bottom' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Any allzero rows are at the bottom'

Description:

Any all-zero rows are at the bottom. Correct step pattern' of first non-zero row entries. ... 4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form. Any all-zero row at the bottom ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: And48
Category:
Tags: allzero | bottom | echelon | rows

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Any allzero rows are at the bottom'


1
4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form
  • Any all-zero rows are at the bottom.
  • Correct step pattern of first non-zero row
    entries.

2
4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form
  • Any all-zero row at the bottom
  • Correct step pattern of first non-zero row
    entries

3
4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form
  • Any all-zero row at the bottom
  • Correct step pattern of first non-zero row
    entries

4
4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form
  • Any all-zero row at the bottom
  • Correct step pattern of first non-zero row
    entries

5
4.4.1 Generalised Row Echelon Form
  • Any all-zero row at the bottom
  • Correct step pattern of first non-zero row
    entries

0
0
0
1
1
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a21
a23
a31
a32
7
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
a31
a32
8
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
a'32
0
9
4.4.1 Formal process
a12
a13
a'23
0
a'32
0
10
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
a'32
0
11
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
0
0
12
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
0
0
13
4.4.1 Formal process (Handout 3)
a12
a13
a'23
0
0
0
14
4.4.2 Augmented Matrix notation
  • We perform row operations on the matrix and the
    opposite row
  • Combine both of these into one matrix called the
    augmented matrix

15
4.4.3 Row sums
  • A way to check calculations
  • Add up rows
  • 2. Write totals on right

9
3
7
  • Do a row operation e.g.

3-2x9
16
4.4.3 Row sums
  • A way to check calculations
  • Add up rows
  • 2. Write totals on right
  • Do a row operation e.g.

9
-15
7
  • Check row sums e.g. 0 (-1) 3 11 -15

17
4.5 Examples
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form

18
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form
  • Write on row sums
  • Use the top left entry to create zeros below it
  • First get a zero in the second row

15
36 4x15
6
19
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form
  • Write on row sums
  • Use the top left entry to create zeros below it
  • First get a zero in the second row

20
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form
  • Write on row sums
  • Use the top left entry to create zeros below it
  • First get a zero in the second row

0
0
-6
-18
21
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
  • Check row sums before continuing...

1 2 3 9 15 ... OK!
0 0 - 6 18 -24 ... OK!
3 1 - 2 4 6 ... OK!
22
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
  • Now get a zero in the third row
  • Want upper triangular form so swap rows 2 and 3

23
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 1
-11
0
-5
-23
-39
  • Now solve by backwards substitution

-5y -33 -23
r1 x 2y 3z 9
  • Hence x 4, y -2, z 3 is the unique
    solution.

24
4.5 Examples
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form

25
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 2
  • Matrix-vector system
  • Write in augmented form
  • Write on row sums
  • Use the top left entry to create zeros below it
  • First get a zero in the third row

26
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 2
  • Use second row to get a zero in the third row

27
4.5 Examples EXAMPLE 2
  • Solve by backwards substitution

r3 2z -8
r2 y - z 6
r1 x - y 1
28
4.6 Determinants
Question During the elimination process, what
has changed about the determinant of the matrix?
  • Swapping rows multiplies the determinant by (-1)
  • Adding or subtracting multiples of rows does not
    change the determinant

29
4.6 Determinants
  • In EXAMPLE 1 we used one swap operation to get
    from

B
A
  • Calculating the determinant

A (-1) B
(-1)x(1)(-5)(-6) -30
  • Non-zero, so we got a unique solution

30
4.6 Determinants
  • In EXAMPLE 2 we used no swaps to get from

B
A
  • Calculating the determinant

(1)(1)(2) 2
A B
  • Non-zero, so got a unique solution

31
4.6 Non-Standard Gaussian Elimination
  • In standard Gaussian Elimination the following
    operation were allowed
  • Swap two rows
  • Add or Subtract a multiple of a row from another
    row.
  • In Non-Standard Gaussian Elimination we are also
    allowed to do the following
  • Multiply a row by a constant. E.g.

32
4.6 Non-Standard Gaussian Elimination
  • Quick Example In Standard G.E.
  • This is a bit messy with the fractions. However,
    in Non-Standard G.E.
  • However, in doing this we have multiplied the
    determinant by 3.

33
4.7 Backwards substitution more general case
  • Two cases after elimination process
  • All diagonal entries non-zero, then determinant
    is non-zero. Hence, get answer by backwards
    substitution.
  • Is a zero on the diagonal, then determinant is
    zero. Either get infinite solutions or no
    solutions.

34
4.7.1 Case of No Solutions
  • Suppose we followed the elimination process and
    got to

11
-3
9
  • Zeros on the diagonal, so determinant is zero.
  • ROW 3 gives the equation
  • This is impossible. Hence there are no solutions.

35
4.7.1 Case of Infinite solutions
  • Suppose instead that
  • ROW 3 now OK 0x 0y 0z 0
  • Have two equations in three unknowns
  • Get infinitely many solutions

36
4.7.1 Case of Infinite solutions
  • Three steps
  • In the final (echelon-form) of the matrix, circle
    the first non-zero entry in each row
  • Find the columns that have no circles in. Each
    column corresponds to a variable.
  • Assign a new name to each of the chosen
    variables, then use back substitution on the
    non-zero rows.

37
4.7.1 Case of Infinite solutions
  • Circle first non-zero row entries
  • Find column with no circles in

Column 2 corresponds to the y variable
  • 3. Assign a name to y let y a

38
4.7.1 Case of Infinite solutions
  • Solve by back substitution

r3 Tells us nothing
r1 3x y 2z 11
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com