Title: JMSC 6022 Media Law
1JMSC 6022 Media Law
Journalism and Media Studies CentreThe
University of Hong Kong
Cheung Ng Sheong Steven v. Eastweek Publisher
Ltd.
by Elsa Cheng Wing Lam
2Background Information
- Cheung Ng Sheong, Steven
- Head of the School of Economics Finance
- of the University of Hong Kong
- - a well-known distinguished economist
3Eastweek Magazine - A weekly magazine covered
current affairs and other business that the
public may be interested - Large circulation
4Background of the Article
- Cheungs elder brother distributed
pamphlets in HKU which containing the
information on disputes within Cheungs
family.
5The Article
- Published in Eastweek on 4 February 1993 (800
words) - Cheung Ng Sheong Silence is Golden
6(No Transcript)
7- Cheung skipped lessons refused to having
group photos with students - Stated that Cheung used silence
disappearance to counteract such gossips
8- Charges in First Instance
- - Steven Cheung sued Eastweek for libel because
in their natural ordinary meaning the said
words meant were understood
9- The plaintiff failed to give lectures to his
students - The plaintiff refused to take group photos within
his students and - The plaintiff failed and / or refused to carry
out or discharge his professional duties as a
professor - The plaintiff has been seriously injured in
reputation he suffered loss and damage
10The Trial in First Instance
- The first jury trial of libel case in the past 80
years - The jury found that the libel had been committed
- The jury awarded a sum of 2.4million as damages
11The Response of Eastweek
- Admitted liability
- But appealed to the Court of Appeal for the
excessive award
12Discussion
13Three Types of Damages
- General Damages
- to give monetary compensation for the loss in
reputation
14- Special Damages
-
- to give monetary compensation for the actual
economic loss of the plaintiff
15- Punitive Damages
- must prove that the defendant has maliciously
published any defamatory libel - it is the burden of the plaintiff that the
defendant is malice
16- Example of punitive damages
- Oriental Press Group V HK Daily
- News
- - 100k was awarded to OPG though its loss was
not serious. The punitive damage was awarded
because of the poor manner of HK Daily News - (1995-1997)
17Mitigating Factors
The defendant made or offered an apology to the
plaintiff for such defamation before the
commencement of the action, or asap as he had an
opportunity of doing so in case the action has
been commenced before there was an opportunity of
making or offering such apology
18 The defendant can use it as a ground of defense
and can use it as an evidence to reduce the damage
19Correction Matters!
- Eastweek published a correction two
weeks later - A student of Cheung wrote to
Eastweek with a group photo with Cheung and said
that Cheung had never skipped lesson
20(No Transcript)
21The Award was Excessive
- the nature of the statement is not malice
- should not impose punitive damage
- Eastweek made corrections in two weeks time
- The damages award should have been compensatory
and designed to assuage the respondents hurt
feelings and loss of dignity
22Will Excessive Affect Freedom of Expression?
- Newspapers will avoid to criticize because they
are afraid to be sued - A lot of libel cases may be found and people will
be very careful when commenting others
23Standard for Intervention by the Court on Jury
Award
- Cheungs case was a jury award. Eastweek appealed
to the Court of Appeal Eastweek admitted
liability but disagreed with the award amount
24- The Court of Appeals scope for intervention was
limited - The Court has no power, unless the parties
agreed, to substitute its own assessment of
damages - If it found the award excessive, it could set
aside the jurys award of damages and order a new
trial on damages only
25Supplementary Information
- Civil or Criminal cases?
- HK Mainland China most libel cases are civil
cases - Taiwan can be criminal cases
- e.g. Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian was
sentenced to eight months in prison for libel
when he was the editor of a magazine in 1986.
26Burden of Proof
- HK Taiwan Defendant
- Mainland China Respondent
27Can the Death be Slandered in Law ?
- HK Taiwan Cannot
- Mainland China people can sue if they think
their ancestors reputation was being injured - The effectiveness can be extended to three
generations
28 Thank You