DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF AN AUTOMATED SOIL MOISTURE SENSING DRIP FERTIGATION SYSTEM PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 29
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF AN AUTOMATED SOIL MOISTURE SENSING DRIP FERTIGATION SYSTEM


1
DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF AN AUTOMATED SOIL
MOISTURE SENSING DRIP FERTIGATION SYSTEM
  • Jonathan H Schroder
  • Rafael Muñoz-Carpena, Yuncong Li

2
High efficiency irrigation
  • Traditional methods of applying large amounts of
    water at a low frequency often result in much of
    the water being lost through percolation on the
    coarse soil common to florida
  • The solution??
  • Combine scientific methods for improving
    irrigation efficiency and management

3
The challenge
This portion of water (50) is easily drained
from the soil during excess irrigation
  • Irrigation design is very dependant on the water
    holding characteristics of the soil.
  • Florida soils commonly have low water holding
    capacity (sands and gravels).
  • The soils of South Florida made artificially by
    crushing the coral surface (Krome soil has 51
    coarse particles gt 2 mm).
  • These soils present challenges for agriculture

4
High frequency low volume (HFLV) irrigation
  • Our recommendation for an efficient and modern
    irrigation system for these areas are based on
    THREE PRINCIPLES
  • 1)       high-frequency/low volume (several
    times per day)
  • 2)       soil moisture sensors for scheduling
    (give water when the plant needs it)
  • 3)       automatic operation
  • One added benefit of high frequency, soil
    moisture-based automated irrigation is
    convenience. Once the system is properly
    installed, normally only minimal supervision is
    required.

5
Irrigation and fertilizer management
  • Irrigation and fertilizer management are
    interlinked. This is very important, as changes
    in one will affect the efficiency of the other!
  • Poor irrigation management will reduce nutrient
    use efficiency

6
QIC and capacitance soil moisture probe
  • Irrigation events are preset in the irrigation
    controller.
  • The soil moisture probes do not initiate an
    event, it only determines if an event is needed
    according to soil moisture status.
  • It gives a yes or no to a predetermined event

7
Quantified Irrigation Controller
8
Field experiments
  • 3 field trials were conducted on plastic mulched
    tomatoes to test the soil moisture-based
    scheduling and QIC
  • South Florida (Homestead) during the 2003/2004
    winter season (gravelly loam)
  • So.FL-TREC again during the 2004/2005 winter
    season (gravelly loam)
  • North Central Florida (Citra) during the 2005
    spring season (fine sand)

9
Objectives of experiments
  • To test for irrigation water savings and
    fine-tune the new soil moisture-based scheduling
    methodology
  • To quantify any reduction in nutrient leaching
    from the root zone using the soil moisture-based
    scheduling.
  • To successfully manage fertilizer by fertigation
    coupled with the soil moisture-based scheduling
    system

10
Exp. 1 So FL 2003-2004
  • The QIC system was set at two thresholds of
    Low400 mV and High 450 mV, corresponding to the
    soil moisture level at 25 and 10 cbar
    respectively, for the gravelly-loam soil of the
    area

11
Field lay-out
12
Results Water Use
13
Results Yields
14
Exp. 2 So FL 2004-2005
15
Lysimeters
16
Field pumphouse layout
17
Pump house
Pressure tank
Venturi injectors
Backflow protection
Mess
Fire-ants
18
Results Water use
  • Large savings occur early in the season

19
Results Yields
Different letters depict statistically
different means for P 0.05 (Holm-Sidak
method) z Total water per treatment includes
the hour per day of establishment irrigation
which was treatment independent
  • Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) is
  • IWUE (Y Yd)/Irr
  • Where Y the total marketable yield
  • Yd the dryland marketable yield (approx 0)
  • Irr the water applied by irrigation

20
Results Nutrient Leaching
Different letters depict statistically
different means for P 0.05 (Holm-Sidak method)
21
Exp 3 Field preparation
  • LAYING OUT RAISED BEDS
  • Cleaning and burying lysimeters

22
Field Equipment
Black plastic mulch beds
Lysimeters
Pumphouse
55 cm
85 cm
23
Data acquisition
  • Recording Soil Moisture and checking probe
    settings
  • Sampling lysimeters

24
Results water IWUE
  • I1 -gt 10 water saving I2 -gt 64 water savings
    over I4

25
Results Nutrient Leaching
26
Summary of results
  • () farmer IWUE in parenthesis

27
Conclusions
  • Significant water savings were recorded on both
    soils for the soil moisture cut-ff systems.
  • Dielectric soil moisture sensors required less
    maintenance than tensiometers on the fast
    draining soils
  • Reduced leaching ( gt58) of N and P fertilizer
    was achieved by the soil moisture-based
    scheduling

28
Dicussions and limitations
  • One tensiometer or ECH2O probe per treatment.
    -gt A single probe may not be representative due
    to soil, plant, probe position or irrigation
    inconsistencies
  • The leached nutrient results depend heavily on
    the accurate placement of plants and emitters
    relative to the lysimeter
  • Not an established system and technology yet, and
    trust in the performance still needs to be
    developed,
  • BUT the system has high potential as can be seen
    from the results!

29
Acknowledgements
  • USDA-SARE for its Research Grant, no. LS03-148
  • Matching Assistantship from the Dean of Research
    Office
  • Tina Dispenza and Harry Trafford for their help
    in many trips to Lovett Irrigation Store
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com