Title: Research Implementation and Information Dissemination
1Research Implementation and Information
Dissemination
2Discussion Items
- Background information
- TxDOTs research implementation programs
- Committee structure
- How implementation works at TxDOT
- How effective we are
- Determining the value of research
3- 32,000 bridges on state system
4Other Numbers
- 3.2 billion annual construction budget
- 14,000 employees
5TP-BR Vis 1-5
6Research and Technology Implementation
Office (RTI)
- Office Director 5 research engineers
- 5 contract managers
- 4 support personnel
- 20.2 million annual research budget
- 80 new projects per year
- Contract with Texas state universities
7TxDOTs 25 Districts
8(No Transcript)
9 Research Management Committees (RMC)
- Pavements
- Transportation Planning
- Hydraulics/ROW/Design/Environmental
- Traffic Operations
- Structures
10Research Management Committees
- Five DEs on each committee
- FHWA representative
- RTI research engineer
- Other members - TxDOT section, branch managers
11Responsibilities of RMC Members
- Serve as Program Coordinators (PC)
- Review, select refine project (problem)
statements submitted by the TAPs. - Review select university proposals submitted in
response to RFPs. - Appoint Project Directors for each project.
- Champion implementation.
12PCs serve on both Committees
13How Implementation Works at TxDOT
14Project Statement
- In refining project statement, PCs
- Consider the Office of Primary Responsibility for
implementing the research results. - Define products as research outputs.
- Specify product format.
15- Each research project has at least one product as
a deliverable. Examples - Software
- Guidebook or manual
- Equipment
- Test procedures
16After the research is complete
- PCs champion implementation.
-
- Implementation is advanced for at least 2
years.
17Promoting Implementation
- Information Dissemination
- Project Summary Reports
- Highlighting Top Innovations
- Implementation Projects
18Information Dissemination
19Project Summary Reports
20PSR Contents include . . . .
- What the researchers did.
- What they found.
- What they recommend.
- List of products.
- Implementation status of products.
21Top Innovations
22Implementation Projects
- Further advances implementation.
- Separate funding available - 5 Million/yr.
- Can fund incremental cost for first time use of a
product on a construction project.
23Implementation Projects also include
- Training courses.
- Initial purchases of equipment.
- Programming required to incorporate new
technology into department software.
24Implementation Stats(Since 1998, over 50 of
the products have been implemented)
25Determining the Value of Research
26Determining the Value of Research
- Compiled at request of the TX Transportation
Commission. - For use in discussions with State Legislature.
- Produced a booklet summarizing results.
27What we did
- 21 high payoff products selected from 3 yrs of
research, 1999-2001. - Benefits estimated over a 10-yr period.
- Benefits quantified in terms of
- Lives saved
- Accidents reduced
- Operational Cost Savings
28Benefit Analysis Calculations(For 10-year Period)
29- Estimates were reviewed by technical experts in
division district offices.
30Total Projected Benefits for 10-Yr Analysis
Period
- 24,960 accidents prevented.
- 245 lives saved.
- 322 million in cost savings to TxDOT.
31Ground Penetrating Radar
- Total 10-year savings -- 57 million
- Based on documented savings on past TxDOT
contracts. - Five years to maximize potential savings
32Seal Coat Constructability Review
- Total 10-year savings -- 17.5 M
- Based on
- Percentage of annual budget (175 M/yr)
- Assumed 1 savings each year
33Precast Concrete Bent Caps
- Total 10-year savings
- 9 million
- Based on reduced construction time
- Cranes operators
- Contractor project office staff
- TxDOT onsite Project Mgmt staff
- Developed cost savings per precast bent cap
34Bottom Line
- Research program cost 1999-2001 54
million - Direct Cost Savings (21 products only) 322
million - Net return on investment ratio
51
35Questions?