Diagnosing Low Back Pain - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnosing Low Back Pain

Description:

Acute: Disc abnormality, strain, compression fractures ... Significant trauma history, or minor ... Osteomyelitis evaluation. Evaluation with prior ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:240
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: gatewa89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnosing Low Back Pain


1
Diagnosing Low Back Pain
  • Eden Wheeler, M.D.
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Rockhill Orthopaedics, P.C.

2
I. History
3
  • Mechanism of injury
  • Associated symptoms
  • Bladder / bowel function
  • Fevers / chills
  • Sleep disturbance
  • Numbness / tingling
  • Prior injuries, treatment and outcomes
  • Medications
  • Family history
  • Social history
  • Vocational
  • Education
  • Tobacco / ETOH / Illicit drugs
  • Function ADLs Mobility
  • Litigation

4
Pain Specifics
  • Quality sharp, dull, shooting, burning, etc.
  • Location / Distribution
  • Radicular Dermatomal distribution, dysesthesias
  • Radiating Nondermatomal
  • Onset
  • Gradual DDD
  • Acute Disc abnormality, strain, compression
    fractures
  • Severity / Intensity
  • Frequency Constant vs. Intermittent
  • Duration
  • Exacerbating and Alleviating Factors
  • Time of Day If nocturnal, consider malignancy

5
Red Flags
  • Significant trauma history, or minor in older
    adults
  • Nocturnal pain in supine position with history of
    cancer
  • Bladder or bowel incontinence or dysfunction
  • Constitutional symptoms
  • Fever / chills
  • Weight loss
  • Lymph node enlargement
  • Risk factors for spinal infection
  • Recent infection
  • IV drug use
  • Immunosuppression
  • Major motor weakness

6
II. Examination
7
A. Physical
  • Posture
  • Splinting
  • Body language
  • Gait
  • Antalgia
  • Heel / Toe pattern
  • Trendelenberg
  • Musculoskeletal
  • ROM
  • Leg length
  • Vascular
  • Atrophy

8
  • Abdomen
  • Presence of masses
  • Back
  • Inspection
  • Palpation
  • ROM
  • Scoliosis
  • Neurological
  • Sensation
  • Motor
  • DTRs
  • Rectal if indicated
  • Evaluation of sphincter tone

9
B. Symptom Magnification Examination
  • Waddell signs Presence of nonorganic signs
    suggesting symptom magnification and
    psychological distress
  • Superficial or nonanatomic distribution of
    tenderness
  • Nonanatomic or regional disturbance of motor or
    sensory impairment
  • Inconsistency on positional SLR
  • Inappropriate/excessive verbalization of pain or
    gesturing
  • Pain with axial loading or rotation of spine
  • Give-away weakness Inconsistent effort on
    manual motor testing with ratcheting rather
    than smooth resistance

10
C. Pathological Examination
  • Spurlings maneuver Lateral rotation and
    extension of spine resulting in neuroforaminal
    narrowing and nerve root encroachment, clinically
    reproducing extremity pain, usually in
    dermatomal distribution
  • Straight-leg raise (SLR) Elevation of lower
    extremity, seated or standing, resulting in
    neural tension at S1 nerve root with extremity
    pain
  • Patricks maneuver Crossed leg with unilateral
    pain indicative of sacro-iliac (SI) joint
    dysfunction
  • Femoral stretch Hip extension stretch with
    heel pushed to buttock in lateral supine or
    prone position resulting in anterior thigh pain

11
III. Low Back Pain
12
A. Epidemiology
  • Incidence of LBP
  • 60-90 lifetime incidence
  • 5 annual incidence
  • 90 of cases of LBP resolve without treatment
    within 6-12 weeks
  • 40-50 LBP cases resolve without treatment in 1
    week
  • 75 of cases with nerve root involvement can
    resolve in 6 months
  • LBP and lumbar surgery are
  • 2nd and 3rd highest reasons for physician visits
  • 5th leading cause for hospitalization
  • 3rd leading cause for surgery

13
B. Disability
  • Age and LBP
  • Leading cause of disability of adults lt 45 years
    old
  • Third cause of disability in those gt 45 years old
  • Prevalence rate
  • Increased 140 from 1970 to 1981 with only125
    population growth
  • Nearly 5 million people in the U.S. are
    ondisability for LBP

14
C. Lifetime Return to Work
  • Success of less than 50 if off work greater
    than 6 months
  • 25 success rate if off work greater than 1 year
  • Nearly 0 success if return to work has not
    occurred in 2 years

15
D. Occupational Risk Factors
  • Low job satisfaction
  • Monotonous or repetitious work
  • Educational level
  • Adverse employer-employee relations
  • Recent employment
  • Frequent lifting
  • Especially exceeding 25 pounds
  • Utilization of poor body mechanics in technique

16
E. Differential Diagnoses
  • Lumbar strain
  • Disc bulge / protrusion / extrusion producing
    radiculopathy
  • Degenerative disc disease
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Spondyloarthropathy
  • Spondylosis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Sacro-iliac dysfunction

17
F. Diagnostic Tools
  • 1. Laboratory
  • Performed primarily to screen for other disease
    etiologies
  • Infection
  • Cancer
  • Spondyloarthropathies
  • No evidence to support value in first 7 weeks
    unless with red flags
  • Specifics
  • WBC
  • ESR or CRP
  • HLA-B27
  • Tumor markers Kidney Breast Lung
    Thyroid Prostate

18
  • 2. Radiographs
  • Pre-existing DJD is most common diagnosis
  • Usually 3 views adequate with obliques only if
    equivocal findings
  • Indications
  • History of trauma with continued pain
  • Less than 20 years or greater than 55 years with
    severe or persistent pain
  • Noted spinal deformity on exam
  • Signs / symptoms suggestive of spondyloarthropathy
  • Suspicion for infection or tumor

19
  • 3. EMG / NCV ( Electrodiagnostics)
  • Can demonstrate radiculopathy or peripheral nerve
    entrapment, but may not be positive in the
    extremities for the first 3-6 weeks and
    paraspinals for the first 2 weeks
  • Would not be appropriate in clinically obvious
    radiculopathy
  • 4. Bone scan
  • Very sensitive but nonspecific
  • Useful for
  • Malignancy screening
  • Detection for early infection
  • Detection for early or occult fracture

20
  • 5. Myelogram
  • Procedure of injecting contrast material into the
    spinal canal with imaging via plain radiographs
    versus CT
  • In past, considered the gold standard for
    evaluation of the spinal canal and neurological
    compression
  • With potential complications, as well as advent
    of MRI and CT, is less utilized
  • More common Headache, nausea / vomiting
  • Less common Seizure, pain, neurological change,
    anaphylaxis
  • Myelogram alone is rarely indicated
  • Hitselberger study 1968 Journal of Neurosurgery
  • 24 of asymptomatic subjects with defects

21
  • 6. CT with myelogram
  • Can demonstrate much better anatomical detail
    than myelogram alone
  • Utilized for
  • Demonstrating anatomical detail in multi-level
    disease in pre- operative state
  • Determining nerve root compression etiology of
    disc versus osteophyte
  • Surgical screening tool if equivocal MRI or CT

22
  • 7. CT
  • Best for bony changes of spinal or foraminal
    stenosis
  • Also best for bony detail to determine
  • Fracture
  • DJD
  • Malignancy
  • SW Wiesel study 1984 Spine
  • 36 of asymptomatic subjects had HNP at
    L4-L5and L5-S1 levels

23
  • 8. Discography (Diagnostic disc injection)
  • Less utilized as initial diagnostic tool due to
    high incidence of false positives as well as
    advent of MRI
  • Utilizations
  • Diagnose internal disc derangement with normal
    MRI / myelo
  • Determine symptomatic level in multi-level
    disease
  • Criteria for response
  • Volume of contrast material accepted by the disc,
    with normals of 0.5 to 1.5 cc
  • Resistance of disc to injection
  • Production of pain---MOST SIGNIFICANT
  • Usually followed by CT to evaluate internal
    architecture, but also may utilize MRI
  • As outcome predictor (Coulhoun study 1988 JBJS)
  • 89 of those with pain response received benefit
    from surgery
  • 52 of those with structural change received
    surgical benefit

24
  • 9. MRI
  • Best diagnostic tool for
  • Soft tissue abnormalities
  • Infection
  • Bone marrow changes
  • Spinal canal and neural foraminal contents
  • Emergent screening
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Spinal cored injury
  • Vascular occlusion
  • Radiculopathy
  • Benign vs. malignant compression fractures
  • Osteomyelitis evaluation
  • Evaluation with prior spinal surgery

25
  • Has essentially replaced CT and myelograms for
    initial evaluations
  • Boden study 1990 JBJS
  • 20 of asymptomatic population less than 60
    years with HNP
  • 36 of asymptomatic population of 60 years
  • Jensen study 1995 NEJM
  • 52 of asymptomatic patients with disc bulge at
    one or more levels
  • 27 of asymptomatic patients with disc
    protrusion
  • 1 of asymptomatic patients with disc extrusion

26
  • MRI with Gadolinium contrast
  • Gadolinium is contrast material allowing
    enhancement of intrathecal nerve roots
  • Utilization
  • Assessment of post-operative spine---most
    frequent use
  • Identifying tumors / infection within /
    surrounding spinal cord
  • Diagnosis of radiculitis
  • Post-operatively can take 2-6 months for
    reduction of mass effect on posterior disc and
    anterior epidural soft tissues which can
    resemble pre-operative studies
  • Only indications in immediate post-operative
    period
  • Hemorrhage
  • Disc infection

27
  • 10. Psychological tools
  • Utilized in case scenarios where psychological or
    emotional overlay of pain is suspected
  • Symptom magnification
  • Grossly abnormal pain drawing
  • Non-responsive to conservative interventions but
    with essentially normal diagnostic studies
  • Includes
  • Pain Assessment Report, which combines
  • McGill Pain Questionnaire
  • Mooney Pain Drawing Test
  • MMPI
  • Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire
  • Cornell Medical Index
  • Eysenck Personality Inventory

28
MRI Nomenclature (PER NASS)
  • Anular fissure Focal disruption of anular
    fibers in concentric, radial or transverse
    distribution
  • Disc bulge Circumferential, diffuse, symmetric
    extension of anulus beyond the adjacent
    vertebral end plates by 3 or more mm, usually due
    to weakened or lax anular fibers
  • Disc protrusion Focal, asymmetric extension of
    disc segment beyond margin of vertebral end
    plates into the spinal canal with most of anular
    fibers intact
  • Disc extrusion Focal, asymmetric extension of
    disc segment and / or nucleus pulposis through
    the anular containment into the epidural space
  • Disc sequestration Extruded disc segment that is
    detached from original with migration into the
    canal
  • Disc degeneration Irreversible structural and
    histiological changes in nucleus seen on MRI T2WI
    images (commonly associated with bulge)

29
Specificity / Sensitivity
30
G. Treatment
  • Medications
  • NSAIDS
  • Membrane stabilizers
  • TCA / Neurontin
  • re-establish sleep pain
  • reduce radicular dysesthesias
  • Muscle relaxers
  • re-establish sleep patterns
  • more useful in myofascial/muscular pain
  • Narcotics rarely indicated
  • Steroids more useful for radiculitis
  • Non-narcotic analgesics Ultram

31
  • Physical therapy
  • Modalities
  • electrical stimulation/TENS
  • Postural education / body mechanics
  • Massage / mobilization / myofascial release
  • Stretching / body work
  • Exercise / strengthening
  • Traction
  • Pre-conditioning / work-conditioning
  • Injections
  • Epidural blocks
  • Facet blocks
  • Trigger point
  • SNRB
  • SI joint

32
  • Surgery
  • Laminectomy
  • Fusion
  • Discectomy
  • Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy
  • Success rate variable 50 -85
  • Low rate of complications
  • Infection
  • Peripheral nerve injury
  • Benefits
  • Outpatient procedure
  • Minimal to no epidural scarring
  • No general anesthesia
  • Spine stability preservation
  • Decreased cost

33
  • Chemonucleolysis
  • IDET Intradiscal Electrotherapy or Spine CATH
  • Alternative
  • Chiropractic
  • Clinical studies show benefit only in first 3
    weeks of symptoms
  • Acupuncture
  • Biofeedback

34
IV. Specific Disorder Considerations
35
A. Sacroiliitis
  • History
  • Trauma is very common
  • Repetitive LS motion--lumbar rotation or axial
    loading
  • No specific correlation with exacerbating
    activities
  • Commonly have leg length discrepancy or condition
    contributing
  • Biomechanics
  • Movement of the SIJ is involuntary, usually from
    muscle imbalances
  • Can occur at multiple levels lower extremities,
    hip, LS spine
  • Motion is complex and not single-axis based

36
  • Differential Diagnosis
  • a. Fracture
  • Traumatic
  • Insufficiency stress fractures elderly patient
    with osteoporosis without history of trauma
  • Fatigue stress fractures usually athletes /
    soldiers
  • b. Infection
  • Hematogenous spread with predisposing history
  • Usually unilateral symptoms present
  • c. Degenerative joint disease
  • d. Metabolic disease
  • e. Referred pain

37
  • f. Seronegative spondyloarthropathies
  • RA--usually not until late in course of disease
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • g. Primary SI tumor
  • Rare and usually synovial villoadenomas
  • h. Iatrogenic instability
  • Via pelvic tumor resection or bone graft site
  • i. Osteitis condensans ilii
  • Prevalence of 2.2 , primarily in multiparous
    women
  • Usually self-limiting and bilateral
  • j. Reactive disease as sequellae of PID

38
  • Diagnostic Tools
  • X-rays Up to 25 of asymptomatic adults over
    50 years can have abnormalities
  • MRI / CT Only if looking for tumor
  • Bone scan Good for fractures but less favorable
    for inflammation
  • Treatment
  • Medications NSAIDS
  • Physical therapy
  • Correct limb discrepancy
  • Injection Fluoroscopy-guided vs. local
  • Surgical fusion Few figures for efficacy

39
B. Cauda Equina Syndrome
  • History
  • Sudden, partial or complete loss of voluntary
    bladder function due to massive disc
    impingement on spinal nerves
  • Can include loss of sensation as well as
    sphincter tone
  • Treatment
  • Urgent decompression is mandatory for prevention
    of irreparable / irreversible bladder damage
  • 12 hours is the maximum time prior to
    irreversible changes

40
C. DDD and Spondylosis
  • Clinical
  • Up to 75 of involvement of the spine occurs at
    2 levels L5-S1 and L4-L5
  • Possible factors that contribute to development
  • Changes with maturation in
  • Nutrition
  • Disc chemistry
  • Hormones
  • Occupational forces
  • Progression of disc narrowing leads to
    degenerative changes of bony structures,
    especially posterior components, leading to
    spondylosis

41
  • Treatment
  • Medications
  • Physical therapy
  • Lifestyle changes
  • Smoking cessation
  • Weight loss
  • Vocational changes
  • Injections
  • Less helpful if pain is limited to central low
    back only
  • Surgery
  • Laminectomy
  • Fusion

42
D. Spinal Stenosis
  • Clinical
  • Results from narrowing of spinal canal and / or
    neural foramina (CONGENITAL OR DEGENERATIVE)
  • Most common complaint is leg pain limiting
    walking
  • Neurogenic / Pseudoclaudication pain in lower
    extremities with gait
  • Relief can occur with
  • stopping activity
  • sitting, stooping or bending forward
  • Common are complaints of weakness and numbness of
    extremities
  • Usually becomes symptomatic in 6th decade

43
  • Diagnosis
  • CT and MRI may yield false-positive results,
    therefore EMG / NCV can be helpful to confirm
    diagnosis
  • Myelography also can be confirmatory and
    pre-surgical screening tool
  • Treatment
  • Medications
  • Physical therapy
  • TENS
  • Epidural injections
  • Surgical decompression laminectomy

44
E. HNP
  • Clinical
  • Low back pain wit associated leg symptoms
  • Positions can induce radicular symptoms
  • Posterolateral disc pathology most common
  • Area where anular fibers least protected by PLL
  • Greatest shear forces occur with forward or
    lateral bend
  • Central disc pathology
  • Usually with LBP only without radicular symptoms,
    unlessa large defect is present

45
  • Treatment
  • Conservative treatment
  • Saul and Saul study 1989 Spine
  • gt 90 success rate of symptom resolution
    withnon-operative management
  • Bozzao study 1992 Radiology
  • 69 patients with HNP studied longitudinally
    with MRI
  • 63 with gt30 reduction with 48 gt 70
    reductionover time
  • Medications
  • Physical therapy
  • Injections
  • Surgery

46
F. Pars Interarticularis Defects
  • Spondylolysis
  • Anatomic defect in the bony pars interarticularis
    within the lamina
  • May uni- or bilateral
  • Can be congenital or induced
  • Usually without clinical symptoms with incidental
    findings on radiographs

47
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Progression of spondylolysis with separation
  • Grades assigned I-IV for level of translation
  • Most common levels are L5-S1 (70 ) and L4-L5 (25
    )
  • May be asymptomatic, but can result in
  • Spondylosis
  • DDD
  • Radiculopathy
  • Treatment
  • Medication
  • Physical Therapy
  • Injections
  • Surgery

48
V. Chronic Pain Issues
49
A. Pain Reinforcing Factors
  • Secondary gain Support system allows passive /
    inactive role for patient via catering to needs
    and hence fostering dependency
  • Environmental Inadequate opportunity or skills
    to compete in the professional community
  • Physician knowledge deficit In areas of
    diagnosis and appropriate treatment, can prolong
    symptoms and validate pain behavior
  • Workers compensation Laws have become
    counterproductive-- financial compensation or
    open claim may discourage desire for return work
    and impede recovery
  • Litigation Anticipation of large financial
    settlement can reinforce pain behavior and
    develop into learned pain behavior

50
B. Risk Factors for Delayed Recovery

51
C. Discouraging Chronic Pain
  • Requiring employer to accommodate restrictions to
    allow continued working during treatment and
    recovery
  • Rapid abjudication of disability and compensation
    claims
  • Physician education re appropriate treatments
    and limiting use of potentially addictive
    medications
  • Ergonomic work environments
  • Patient education re disease process and
    treatment options

52
  • D. Considerations ofPM R Treatment
  • Physical therapy is initially usually one of
    modalities with progression into more active
    exercise
  • Pre-conditioning therapy is more functional with
    transition into Work Conditioning (Work
    Hardening) program
  • Always consider return to work, whether modified
    duty with restrictions or limiting hours worked
  • If patients poorly tolerate standard therapy,
    consider pool therapy intervention which
    allows elimination of gravity effects
  • Functional Capacity Evaluations utilized if
    patients are not progressing through therapy or
    if have reached a plateau and abilities as
    well as restrictions need to be assessed
  • Job site evaluations appropriate if concerns re
    ergonomics

53
E. Final Thoughts
  • It is the patient, not the diagnostic test, that
    is treated
  • 80 of patients will recover from acute low back
    pain within 3 days to 3 weeks, with or without
    treatment, with up to 90 resolved in 6-12 weeks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com