Suffering at End of Life: Michigan Status Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Suffering at End of Life: Michigan Status Report

Description:

2. Data Sources. 2004 EOL Needs Assessment. 50 Stakeholder & 57 hospice mgr interviews ... Location of Hospital-Based PC Teams. Pain & Sx Mgt Commiittee ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Kay7165
Learn more at: https://www.michigan.gov
Category:
Tags: end | for | half | life | michigan | pc | report | status | suffering

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Suffering at End of Life: Michigan Status Report


1
Suffering at End of LifeMichigan Status
Report Recommendations
  • Kay Presby MPH RN
  • Pain Symptom Management Committee 02.08.07

2
Data Sources
  • 2004 EOL Needs Assessment
  • 50 Stakeholder 57 hospice mgr interviews
  • 2002 Michigan Resident Death File
  • 2004 Special Cancer Behavioral Risk Factor
    Survey, EOL Module
  • Even years, phone, MPHI MSU IPPSR
  • 2006 Census of Hospital-Based Palliative Care
    Programs

3
Project Sponsors
  • Michigan Dept of Community Health
  • Michigan Public Health Institute
  • Michigan Hospice Palliative Care Organization
  • Michigan Cancer Consortium

4
Good News
  • Infrastructure
  • Expert professionals
  • Model programs
  • Palliative care teams

A
EOL Pain Policy
5
Location of Hospital-Based PC Teams
6
Good News
  • Infrastructure
  • Expert professionals
  • Model programs
  • Palliative care teams
  • Public Awareness
  • 90 aware of hospice
  • 60 use hospice

A
EOL Pain Policy
7
Disappointing News
  • Policy has had little impact on practice.
  • Hospice length of service is dropping.
  • 1/3 die before one week
  • Median LOS is 18 days
  • Needless suffering still is widespread in
    Michigan.

8
Who says so?
  • Michigan Commission on EOL Care, 2002
  • Stakeholders, 2004(n50)
  • The lack of effective pain and symptom
    management is a public health issue that requires
    the highest level of professional and regulatory
    attention.
  • 80 named eliminating unnecessary suffering as
    the top end of life priority.

9
Who says so?
  • Hospice managers, 2004
  • Patients families, 2004
  • 90 Pain management is a problem in their
    service area.
  • 48 At least half of patients admitted in
    severe pain (6).
  • Why not before?
  • Why doesnt anyone else know?
  • How could you do this so quickly?

10
Place of Death by Age, Michigan 2002
  • Michigan Resident Death File, 2002

11
Distribution of Decedents, Any Terminal Illness,
by Site Avg Pain Level for Final 3 Months, MI
2004 BRFS
12
Back of the envelope
  • 87,500
  • 61,250
  • 23,275
  • Average annual count of deaths in Michigan
  • 70 die of chronic disease
  • 38 live their final 3 months with severe to
    excruciating pain, as reported by caregivers

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Put a face on the suffering
  • The person in pain today
  • does not have to wait
  • for a better drug
  • to be developed
  • he just needs someone
  • to prescribe correctly
  • what we already know.
  • (Joanne Lynn, MD, 2000)
  • Goldie Detroit metro
  • Tom western Mich
  • Henry mid Michigan
  • James northern MI
  • Colleen thumb

16
Invisible to Health Care System?
  • Not according to Wennberg study of intensity of
    services during final 6 mos for Michigan Medicare
    decedents in 1995-96
  • 15 to 45 were admitted to ICU
  • Average no. of physician visits 16 to 34
  • Up to 33 saw 10 physicians
  • Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care in Michigan, 2000
    http//www.bcbsm.org

17
Then why the suffering?
  • Input from interviewed hospice managers (n57)
  • 90 Protocol doesnt fit type or intensity of
    pain wrong drug, dose, frequency
  • 70 Lack of clinician knowledge re opioid drugs
  • dosing, atypical pain RN reluctance
  • 30 Pain med not taken as directed
  • 10 Side effects, fear of addiction
  • End of Life in Michigan, Needs Assessment Report,
    2005

18
Critical Issues to Address
  • Undertreatment of pain has not been embraced as
    an urgent problem in Michigan.
  • Clinicians cant do what they dont know.
  • Hospitals are slow to embrace palliative care as
    a clinical and business priority.
  • Nursing homes struggle with pain mgt and hospice
    is not often used.
  • Consumers expect to suffer. They dont know that
    pain is optional at the end of life.

19
Key Recommendations
  • Public Health Administration
  • Establish an end-of-life unit within the Division
    of Chronic Disease and Injury Control to
  • Monitor population needs
  • Foster alliances and convene partners for
    coordinated action
  • Organize and galvanize statewide action
  • Coordinate action among state units

20
Key Recommendations
  • Bureau of Health Professions
  • Require CME in pain mgt for license renewal.
  • Adopt the 2004 FSMB model pain policy.
  • Bureau of Health Systems
  • Require access to hospice services in all nursing
    homes.
  • Establish an M-tag for pain management.

21
Key Recommendations
  • Medical Services Administration
  • Assure coverage and reimbursement for hospice and
    palliative care services by all health plans.
  • Require access to palliative care consults in
    network hospitals board-certified physicians
    (ABHPM) and nurses preferred (CHPN, BCPCM).
  • Division of Chronic Disease Injury Control
  • Wage a sustained community organization campaign
    to prepare consumers to expect and demand
    effective pain control.

22
Essential Strategies
  • Make it easy to do the right thing
  • Systems
  • Give the policy teeth
  • Consequences
  • Make a plan and assure action
  • Communicate, implement, sustain, monitor

23
End-of-Life Needs Assessment Report
  • Available online at the Michigan Cancer
    Consortium website
  • http//www.michigancancer.org/OurPriorities/EndOf
    LifeCare_InformationForProviders.cfm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com