RadarDerived Precipitation Part 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

RadarDerived Precipitation Part 4

Description:

Gauge reports are matched with radar estimate for that area (9 nearest radar bins) ... Summer 1988: Matt Kelsch, Denice Walker, Erik Rasmussen, Ken Heideman ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: COM7156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RadarDerived Precipitation Part 4


1
Radar-Derived PrecipitationPart 4
  • I. Radar Climatology
  • II. Radar Representation of Precipitation
  • III. WSR-88D, PPS
  • IV. PPS Adjustment, Limitations
  • V. Effective Use

Hydrometeorology 99-2 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 22
June 1999 kelsch_at_comet.ucar.edu
2
IV. Stage I PPS Module 4 Precipitation
Adjustment
  • Automated rain gauges are polled at a set time
    interval (once per hour) and used to determine if
    a bias exists in the radar-derived accumulation
    field.
  • Gauge reports are matched with radar estimate for
    that area (9 nearest radar bins)
  • The method (using the Kalman Filter) is designed
    to identify a single, representative radar bias
  • If a bias is determined to exist, the entire
    radar-derived accumulation field is adjusted
    accordingly.
  • Accurate and representative gauge reports are
    essential

3
(No Transcript)
4
Radar-Rain Gauge Comparisons
  • Radar samples a volume of the atmosphere
  • At discrete intervals
  • Up to several thousands feet AGL
  • Over a surface area which may exceed 1 mi2
  • Accumulations are estimated from reflectivities
    using an empirical Z-R relationship
  • Rain gauges sample
  • Continuously
  • At the surface
  • Over an area less than 1 ft2
  • Accumulations are measurements with the error
    factors associated with the gauge type

5
Stage I PPS
  • Limitations
  • Gauges provide inadequate representation of the
    mesoscale structure of precipitation
  • The vertical distribution of precipitation
    sampled by radar may be inadequate
  • l km above the ground _at_ 75 km distance
  • may look over the top of stratiform
    precipitation
  • significant evaporation may occur beneath radar
    beam
  • problem is greater where terrain blocking exists
  • Enhanced radar return occurs in melting
    layer/bright band.

6
(No Transcript)
7
Forecast Systems Laboratory (FSL)
  • Radar/Rain Gauge Comparison at FSL for
    Convection
  • With known bad gauge reports manually removed
  • 71 within a factor of 2
  • 77 within a factor of 2 (67 within factor of
    1.25) when either radar or gauge amount is gt13mm
    (0.5 in)
  • With known bad gauge reports NOT removed
  • 77 within a factor of 2
  • 51 within a factor of 2 when either gauge or
    radar amount is gt13mm (0.5 in)
  • Brandes and Wilson (1979) 75 within factor of
    2

8
Rain Gauges
  • Automated gauges - Two main problems
  • (1) Data disruptions cause missing periods of
    5-20 min during height of storm.
  • Underestimations by gauge
  • (2) Noise in communication lines from lightning
    cause false reports.
  • Overestimations by gauge
  • Summer 1988 Matt Kelsch, Denice Walker, Erik
    Rasmussen,
  • Ken Heideman
  • Wedge gauges at BOU, LVE, PTL, LGM, ERI
  • False reports verified at PTL, ERI
  • 18 out of 22 significant rain days (3 sites
    gt0.1) had data disruptions during storms

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Stage 1 PPS Limitation (cont.)
  • Hail enhances radar reflectivity resulting in the
    derivation of anomalously high rainfall rates.
  • Accumulation may be overestimated by more than an
    order of magnitude
  • Threshold to correct anomalous rainfall rates may
    cause underestimation of atypical heavy rain
    events
  • Problem varies with site, season, and ambient
    conditions
  • Radar bias adjustments only work for systematic
    errors when the bias is uniform across the radar
    domain.
  • Terrain blocking.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Stage 1 PPS Limitation (cont.)
  • Hail enhances radar reflectivity resulting in the
    derivation of anomalously high rainfall rates.
  • Accumulation may be overestimated by more than an
    order of magnitude
  • Threshold to correct anomalous rainfall rates may
    cause underestimation of atypical heavy rain
    events
  • Problem varies with site, season, and ambient
    conditions
  • Radar bias adjustments only work for systematic
    errors when the bias is uniform across the radar
    domain.
  • Terrain blocking.

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Adaptation Parameters
  • The adaptation parameter philosophy assists with
    general variations associated with site and
    season (coastal plain versus semi-arid prairie),
    but cannot easily account for atypical events
    within the climatology of a particular site or
    season.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com