The Challenge of Convective Forecasting: Cold Season Convection by

1 / 128
About This Presentation
Title:

The Challenge of Convective Forecasting: Cold Season Convection by

Description:

The Challenge of Convective Forecasting: Cold Season Convection by –

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 129
Provided by: celes8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Challenge of Convective Forecasting: Cold Season Convection by


1
The Challenge of Convective Forecasting Cold
Season Convectionby
Lance F. Bosart Department of Earth and
Atmospheric SciencesThe University at
Albany/SUNY/ES-2271400 Washington AvenueAlbany,
NY 12222
NCAR Colloquium on the Challenge of Convective
Forecasting 10-21 July 2006
2
(No Transcript)
3
Source van den Broeke et al. (2005)
4
Source van den Broeke et al. (2005)
5
Source van den Broeke et al. (2005)
6
Source van den Broeke et al. (2005)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Source Blier and Batten (1994)
9
Source Blier and Batten (1994)
10
Source Blier and Batten (1994)
11
Source Blier and Batten (1994)
12
Source Hales (1985)
13
Source Hales (1985)
14
Source Hales (1985)
15
Source Hales (1985)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Source Reed and Blier (1986a)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Source Reed and Blier (1986b)
20
Source Reed and Blier (1986b)
21
Source Reed and Blier (1986b)
22
Source Reed and Blier (1986b)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Source Reed and Blier (1986b)
GS 35-255
27
(No Transcript)
28
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
29
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
30
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
31
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
32
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
33
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
34
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
35
Source Burke and Schultz (2004)
GS 35-255
36
(No Transcript)
37
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
38
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
39
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
40
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
41
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
42
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
43
Source Gyakum and Barker (1988)
GS 35-255
44
(No Transcript)
45
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
46
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
47
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
48
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
49
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
50
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
51
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
52
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
53
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
54
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
55
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
56
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
57
Source Bosart and Seimon (1988)
58
Motivation
  • Understand physical mechanisms behind cool season
    (November March) tornado occurrence in the
    Southeast U.S.
  • Understand role of mesoscale features in
    modifying large-scale environment to enhance or
    inhibit tornado development

Source Wasula et al. (2006)
59
COMPOSITE TORNADO EVENT 0000-0600 UTC (n393,
Tornado point 32 N, 90 W)
500 hPa heights (solid, dam), vorticity (dashed,
x 10-5 s-1), vort. advection (shaded, x 10-10
s-2)
200 hPa heights (solid, dam), isotachs (shaded, m
s-1)
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
60
COMPOSITE TORNADO EVENT 0000-0600 UTC (n393,
Tornado point 32 N, 90 W)
850 hPa heights (solid, m), temperature (dashed,
C), temp. advection (shaded, x 10-5 C s-1)
1000 hPa heights (solid, m), 1000-500 hPa thck
(dashed, dam), 700 hPa relative humidity ()
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
61
COMPOSITE TORNADO EVENT 0000-0600 UTC (n393,
Tornado point 32 N, 90 W)
700 hPa heights (solid, m), vertical motion
(dashed and shaded, x 10-3 hPa s-1),
850-500 hPa lapse rate (dashedC), 850 hPa ?e
(shaded, K), 850 hPa winds
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
62
SEVERE WEATHER REPORTS 22-23 February 1998
7 Tornadoes 3 F3 42 Fatalities 260 Injuries
Blue Wind gt 25.7 m s-1 Green Hail gt 1.91
cm Red Tornado
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
63
23 February 1998 0000 UTC AVN Analysis
SFC
500 hPa
850 hPa
200 hPa
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
64
Tampa Bay (TBW) Sounding and Hodograph 23
February 1998 0000 UTC
CAPE 2891 J/kg LI -9 C LCL 962 hPa
V (m s-1)
U (m s-1)
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
65
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
66
22/1815 UTC IR Satellite
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
67
22/2115 UTC IR Satellite
23/0015 UTC IR Satellite
22/2345 UTC IR Satellite
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
68
23/0015 UTC
22/2255 UTC
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
69
23/0315 UTC
23/0145 UTC
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
70
23/0530 UTC
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
71
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
72
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
73
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
74
SST gt 0 SSTlt0 LAND
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
75
Source Wasula et al. (2006)
76
The 9 Dec'05 Storm Motivation
  • Deepened rapidly and more than anticipated.
  • Significant mesoscale structure was observed.
  • Some tropical-like" structure was present.
  • Jet-cyclone interactions appeared to be two-way.

77
(No Transcript)
78
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
TAUNTON MA 250 AM EST FRI DEC 9 2005 CROSS
SECTIONS STILL SHOW TREMENDOUS MID LEVEL
FRONTOGENESISIN THIS REGION WITH EXCELLENT
POTENTIAL FOR SLANTWISE CONVECTION/MESOSCALE
BANDING. THIS IS ALSO ZONE OF MAXIMUM SNOW
GROWTH. ONLY LIMITING FACTOR TO MAKING THIS
ABLOCKBUSTER EVENT CONTINUES TO BE SPEED OF
SYSTEM...SO ALTHOUGH IT'S GOING TO SNOW HARD FOR
SEVERAL HOURS FROM MIDMORNING INTO EARLY
AFTERNOON WITH SNOWFALL RATES OF 2" PER
HOUR...IT SHOULD NOT LAST LONG ENOUGH TO GIVE
WIDESPREAD TOTALS OVER 10". WE'LL PROBABLY GET
SOME THUNDER/LIGHTNINGREPORTS WITH THIS AS WELL.
79
1745 UTC 9 Dec 2005
80
1754 UTC 9 Dec 2005
81
1954 UTC 9 Dec 2005
82
Source http//www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/rmct
c/DTmaps/animSelect.php
83
Source http//www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/rmct
c/DTmaps/animSelect.php
84
Source http//www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/rmct
c/DTmaps/animSelect.php
85
1500 UTC 9 December 2005
86
1800 UTC 9 December 2005
87
2000 UTC 9 December 2005
88
Source http//www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_realtime
.php?stationBUZM3
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
1800 UTC 9 Dec 2005
92
Source Matthew Greenstein
1800 UTC 9 Dec 2005
93
Summary and Conclusions
  • Example of explosive secondary cyclogenesis.
  • High shear environment associated with a strong
    jet.
  • Low CAPE environment associated with steep lapse
    rates aloft.
  • Small elevated CAPE likely due to warm air
    crossing jet axis.
  • Jet reconfigures in response to rapidly deepening
    storm.
  • Frontogenetical forcing helps to maintain strong
    mesoscale snowband.
  • Coastal front ahead of cyclone center evolves
    into a bent-back front.
  • Cyclone had some attributes of a developing
    tropical storm.

94

Cold Season Severe Weather Event of 13 February
2006
  • Widespread wind damage in eastern New York and
    western New England.
  • Measured peak wind of 85 kt in Saratoga Springs,
    New York.
  • Damaging winds associated with bowing line
    segments.
  • Example of a strongly forced, high-shear,
    low-CAPE severe weather event in absence of
    sunshine.
  • Possible downward momentum transport in
    convective cores.
  • May be similar to events described by van den
    Broeke et al. (2005).

95
(No Transcript)
96
(No Transcript)
97
(No Transcript)
98
(No Transcript)
99
(No Transcript)
100
(No Transcript)
101
(No Transcript)
102
(No Transcript)
103
(No Transcript)
104
(No Transcript)
105
(No Transcript)
106
(No Transcript)
107
(No Transcript)
108
(No Transcript)
109
(No Transcript)
110
(No Transcript)
111
(No Transcript)
112
(No Transcript)
113
(No Transcript)
114
(No Transcript)
115
(No Transcript)
116
(No Transcript)
117
(No Transcript)
118
(No Transcript)
119
(No Transcript)
120
(No Transcript)
121
(No Transcript)
122
(No Transcript)
123
(No Transcript)
124
(No Transcript)
125
(No Transcript)
126
(No Transcript)
127
(No Transcript)
128
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com