Title: Building an Open Access World
1Building an Open Access World
- Vivian Siegel, Ph.D.
- DASER Summit, 12/03/05
2Open Access Publishing
- What give you one definition
- Why the ideology
- Starting an open access journal
- Transitioning to open access
3What is open access publishing?
- Free and unrestricted online access to the
research literature and databases - Users are licensed to download, print, copy,
redistribute, and use - Papers are deposited in public databases that
serve as archives and that allow sophisticated
searches
4Why open access?(the egosystem)
- It best matches the needs of researchers (both as
readers and authors) - It best matches the goals of the funders of
research - It best meets the publishing mandate to
disseminate information as widely (and as
rapidly) as possible
5The message from Elsevier
- Access Impact Value
- open access maximizes the impact of the research
that you publish
6Freely available articles are cited more
frequently
From Brody et al., 2004
7Transitioning to Open Access
Open access
Subscription- based
?
8Starting vs Transitioning to Open Access
- Brand new journal
- Develop reputation
- Build Submissions
- Build Readership, Usage
- No Legacy Data
- Can set expectations
- Established journal
- Established reputation
- Established Submissions
- Established Readership
- Legacy Data
- Legacy Economics
9Additional challenges for PLoS
- Brand new organization
- Need to build brand reputation
- Need to build business infrastructure
10What made PLoS possible
- Philanthropy
- Credibility within Scientific Community
- Support from Scientific Community
- Support from Library Community
11Starting an Open Access Journal
- Brand new journal
- Develop reputation
- Build Submissions
- Build Readership, Usage
- No Legacy Data
- Can set expectations
12Building Submissions(the Impact Factor effect)
Submissions to PLoS Biology DOUBLED the month the
IF was released!
13The economics of open access
14Ways to fund open access
- Philanthropy (angel funders)
- Article processing fees (author side charges)
- paid primarily by the funders of research (what
PLoS advocates) or perhaps from other sources - Could be a mix of submission and publication fees
- Memberships
- Advertising (Biotechniques)
- Commercial reprints, other content delivery
- Open access to research articles but not to
value-added material such as reviews (BMJ) - Print supports online version
15Author-side charges are not new
- Subscription model
- Page charges
- Color charges
- Correction charges
- Reprints or pdf
- PLoS model
- Article processing fee
16(No Transcript)
17Costs to Publishing
- Copy Editing
- Figure Manipulation
- Professional Editors
- Front Section (reviews, editorials)
- Fee Waivers
18The Costs of Publishing in PLoS
BiologyProduction Only
- Production costs for published research articles
only - Per page costs Per page costs Per article cost
(assume 11-page article) - Pre-editing macro 0.90/page 10/article
- Copy editing 20/page 220/article
- Figure preparation 13.65/page 150/article
- Layout 16/page (text) 176/article
- 12.50/page (graphics) 138/article
(avg.6/article) - Proofs/correction 4.75/page 52.25/article
- XML Mark-Up 3.25/page 35.75/article
- PDF creation 1.50/page 16.50/article
- Figure conversion to JPEG 1.60/page
17.50/article - XML upload/QC 3.75/page 41.25/article
- Deposit to CrossRef/PMC 1.15/page
12.50/article - TOTAL 74.05/page 869.75/article
- Electronic Manuscript Management (20
acceptance) 200/article - TOTAL (including electronic manuscript
processing) 1069.75/article - From PLoS White Paper http//www.plos.org/download
s/oa_whitepaper.pdf
19Offsetting the costs of Publishing
Offsetting the editorial and front section costs
of high-end journals will help mitigate
financial risks due to plan uncertainties
Option 1 Subsidize with Revenue from Other
Journals Journals with lower rejection rates and
productions costs can bring in a larger
margin Option 2 Charge more for High-End
Journals Risk the market may not be able to bear
the cost. Is 5000 too much? 10,000? Option 3
Fund the Front Section Separately Published
authors should not have to cover the costs of the
front section. The front section could be funded
separately in a number of ways, such as
advertising, sponsorships, even subscriptions for
front section (e.g., BMJ model). Option 4
Obtain Funding for Fee Waivers If journals are to
be needs blind, then there need to be established
mechanisms for covering the costs of those who
cannot pay. These costs need not be passed on to
those who can pay. Option 5 Editorial Oversight
Fee For typical high end journals, 80-90 of
Editorial time is spent on papers that dont get
accepted. Those that do get accepted require
significant editorial time and oversight. An
Editorial Oversight fee provides a potential
means to recover this cost.
20Transitioning to Open Access
Open access
Subscription- based
?
21(No Transcript)
22Encourage existing journals to offer options
- Open access option (e.g., PNAS) slowly increase
numbers of papers while working out the economics - Keep front section under subscription barrier
(BMJ) - Transition immediately but incent libraries and
individual subscribers to keep print
subscriptions (NAR)
23Encourage authors to make accessibility of their
research a priority
- Choose open access journals and options whenever
they can - Archive in a freely accessible repository when
they cannot
24Encourage investors in research (funders and
institutions) to cover publication costs
- Already happening in biomedicine, where the cost
of publication is about 1 the cost of research - Major shifts would need to happen in other
fields, such as ecology, where the publication
charge might equal the cost of the research. This
may be a place for institutions to take the lead,
as they already subsidize publication costs
through subscriptions
25Reduce the costs of publication
- Develop open source publication management
software - Give more control and responsibility to authors
for copy editing and figure manipulation - Print on demand
26Transitioning to Open Access
Open access
Subscription- based
!