Title: Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control
1Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control
- Geoff Benson, Ph.D
- Dept. of Agricultural Resource Economics
- N C State University
- St. Louis, MO. Oct. 18, 2002
2Overview
- Economic Incentives
- Beef Dairy
- Industry Structure Disease management
- Farm Level Economics
- Implications
3Economic Incentives
- When there are no public health policies in
effect, farmers must look at costs benefits to
them
- Regulation, or compensation, changes the
incentives
- Industry concerns need industry wide programs for
reasons of effectiveness and fairness
4 Focus on Farm Profit
5JD Control
- Benefits to farmer
- Reduction in number of cows affected losses
caused by the disease
- Collateral benefits from other, non-JD, diseases
because of changes implemented
6 Beef
- 900,000 farms have beef cattle, of which 800,000
have cows
- 33 mil. beef cows
- 625,000 of farms with cows have less than 50
- 175,000 have 50 cows
Source USDA, NASS, Cattle, 2/01/02
7Beef Farm JD Costs
- The productive life of a cow in the herd is
reduced
- Reduced cow cull value
- Calf weaning rate may be reduced
- Breeding stock sales are lost
8JD Control in Beef Herds
- Cow-calf producers buy bulls on a regular basis
- Handling facilities may be poor
- Practical management or control plans are
difficult in pasture based systems
9 JD Control in Beef Herds
- Many small herds are run by part-time farmers or
as a sideline
- Commercial sized cow-calf herds are low profit
- Seed stock producers have the most to lose or gain
10Breeding Stock Producers
- Clean breeding stock may sell at a premium
- But, US market is not well developed yet --Timing
issue
- Testing a herd of unknown JD status may show
infection loss of sales
- Applies to beef dairy
11 Dairy
- 97,000 farms, 9.2 mil. cows, specialized
- Mostly commercial, rely on milk sales, some
breeding stock purchases
- Some registered herds sell breeding stock
- Facilities vary but control is feasible on most
farms
12Dairy Farm JD Losses
- Lost milk income
- Increased herd turnover culling death losses
- Reduced value of cull cow
- Reduced breeding stock sales
- Indirect opportunity costs
13Farm Level Losses - NAHMS
14Farm Level Impacts - NAHMS
- Herd impact depended mostly on percentage of
cows that were culled, possibly with clinical
symptoms
- Sub-clinical losses per cow were much smaller
15Farm Level Impacts
- Wide variation in economic loss - NAHMS reports
estimates of
- 389 to 959 per clinical cow
- 123 to 696 per non-clinical cow
- Management decisions affect the size of these
losses somewhat
16 Losses - Infected Herd
- Economic losses will grow if the disease is left
untreated and spreads in a herd
- For JD positive herds the higher the current
level of infection the more the farmer can afford
to spend to control it
17 Losses in Negative Herd
- Infectious status is unknown
- If infected, losses will increase as the disease
progresses
- If clean, there are potential losses if disease
is introduced
- If clean and would stay clean then control
measures yield no return
18 Losses Negative Herds
Are we here?
Or are we here?
19Time Value of Money -- PV
20Control Strategies - Neg. Herds
- Expected Profit
- (Probability herd is infected Future JD Losses
Prevented)
- (Probability herd is free but will become
infected Losses Prev.)
- (Probability herd is free would not become
infected 0)
- - Control Program Costs
21Designing Control Strategies
- Herds that appear to be JD negative cannot
justify spending much money up front unless they
are high risk
- Have a veterinarian perform a broad based
assessment of health status, bio-security risk
of JD
- Test higher risk herds
22JD Control Strategies
- Types of control measures
- Improved hygiene/manure management
- Separate calves at birth
- Feed clean colostrum
- Feed milk replacer not pooled discarded milk
23JD Control Strategies
- Control measures, continued
- Change heifer raising practices, possibly raise
heifers on contract
- Buy animals from clean sources
- Improve biosecurity program
- Test
- Cull
24JD Control Strategies
- Groenendaal Galligan -- Impact of alternative
control strategies in an infected herd
- Good management stabilized the number of cows
infected
- Good management plus testing culling reduced
the number of infected cows
25JD Control Costs Benefits
- Too many farm specific variables to generalize
- Ideally we need an economic assessment for each
farm to identify likely benefits and costs
associated with the control plan developed for
that farm
26JD Control Program Costs
- Types of Costs
- Vet. services, testing
- Control measures
- Out-of-pocket costs
- Additional investment costs
- Opportunity cost of a managers time -- priorities
27Designing a Profitable Plan
- Status -- Positive or negative
- If positive
- Severity of infection
- Feasible control strategies
- Cost of control measures
- Length of planning horizon
- Interest/Discount rate
28Designing a Profitable Plan
- Status -- Positive or negative
- If negative
- Risk level
- Feasible control strategies
- Cost of control measures
- Length of planning horizon
- Interest/Discount rate
- Priority relationship to other problems
29Present Value Simulation
- For a JD negative herd, PV range was 54,254 to
-33,448 per 100 cows depending on infection
risk, planning horizon, discount rate, costs, and
assumed size and timing of potential economic
losses from JD - Spreadsheet is available at
- http//www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/faculty/benson/PubsBen
son.htm
30Designing a Profitable Plan
- Consider a farms financial status and
performance
- Varies widely from farm to farm
- May affect the control strategy adopted,
particularly if new investment is proposed
31US Dairy Farms Cows, 1993-2001
32294 New York Dairy Farms, 2000
- Range of performance status
- NFI/Cow -436 to 939
- RROA -8 to 15
- Percent Equity 21 to 96
- Debt Coverage Ratio -1.59 to 6.60
- Items are ranked independently
- Source Cornell University
33Conclusions Implications
- Practical JD control strategies are lacking for
cow-calf producers
- Main economic incentives for a JD control program
relate to seed stock farms
34Conclusions Implications
- Dairy farm losses are large for infected herds
but cost of alternative control strategies and
other factors must be considered
- Potential losses are large for JD Negative herds
but risk, cost and the timing of potential
benefits are important issues
35Conclusions Implications
- JD should not be considered in isolation
- Evaluate herd health status, bio-security and JD
risk
- Develop a farm specific herd health program and
evaluate the costs and benefits -- If Plan A
isnt profitable, develop another plan
36Geoff Benson
- Phone 919.515.5184
- Fax 919.515.6268
- E-mail Geoff_Benson_at_ncsu.edu
- Web page
- http//www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/ faculty/benson/bens
on.html
37Remember the Economics